Skip to content

Kinect-based Versus Tablet-based Cognitive Training: a Pilot Study With Psychiatric Patients

Efficacy of Kinect-based Versus Tablet-based Cognitive Training Through Simulations of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: a Pilot Study With Chronic Psychiatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05100849
Enrollment
18
Registered
2021-10-29
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2021-10-30
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychiatric Disorder

Keywords

Cognitive training, Simulations of instrumental activities of daily living, Tablet-based cognitive training, Kinect-based cognitive training, Psychiatric disorders

Brief summary

This study aims to analyze which cognitive training experimental condition - Tablet versus Kinect - results in greater cognitive, mood, quality of life, and functional gains in a sample of chronic psychiatric patients.

Detailed description

Cognitive deficits are a nuclear feature of several psychiatric disorders, leading to a decrease in functional abilities and quality of life. Besides facilitating the inclusion of more ecologically valid stimuli and training tasks, technology-based cognitive training methods allow more dynamic interactions with the cognitive training content, which can result in an enhancement of patients' motivation and engagement in the therapeutic process. The modality of interaction with the cognitive training content may influence patients' response to cognitive training interventions. For instance, cognitive training through the tablet requires essentially hand movements (e.g., interaction with the training tasks by touching the correct stimuli), while cognitive training through the Kinect involves the performance of wide range movements (e.g., interaction with the training tasks by making specific body movements to select the correct stimuli). This study aims to analyze which cognitive training experimental condition - Tablet versus Kinect - results in greater cognitive, mood, quality of life, and functional gains in a sample of chronic psychiatric patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREKinect-based cognitive training

The Kinect-based group will be involved in the standard treatment protocol and will perform a 14-sessions cognitive training program that consists of instrumental activities of daily living simulations. The cognitive training content will be projected onto a wall and patients will interact with the content, i.e., the selection of the appropriate response, through movement (kinect).

The Tablet-based group will be involved in the standard treatment protocol and will perform a 14-sessions cognitive training program that consists of instrumental activities of daily living simulations. Patients will interact with the cognitive training content through a tablet.

Sponsors

Casa de Saúde Câmara Pestana
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universidade da Madeira
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Psychiatric diagnosis; * Maximum age: 75 years old; * Relatively preserved language abilities (expressive and receptive language); * Being able to read and write; * Having no motor limitations; * Having no medical history of neurological conditions (e.g., stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, etc.) * Preserved visual and auditory acuity;

Exclusion criteria

* Experiencing an acute psychiatric episode.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) (Verbal Memory)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT); Min score immediate recall trials=0; Max score immediate recall trials=48; Min score Delayed recall trials=0; Max score delayed recall trials=16. Higher scores on both trials mean a better outcome.
Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT) (Visuospatial skills and visual memory)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT); Min score=0; Max score=36; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS-III) (Processing speed)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Symbol Search and Coding (WAIS-III); Min score=0; Max score dependent on patients' performance in a 120 seconds time frame. Higher scores in both subtests mean a better outcome.
Verbal Fluency Tests (semantic and phonemic) (Executive Functions)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Verbal Fluency Tests (semantic and phonemic); Min score=0; Max score dependent on patients' performance during a 1-minute time frame. Higher scores on both verbal fluency tests mean a better outcome.
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (Cognitive screening)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Min score=0; Max score=30; Higher scores mean a better outcome
Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) (Executive functions screening)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Min score=0; Max score=18; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Toulouse-Piéron Cancellation Test (TP) (Sustained and selective attention)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Toulouse-Piéron Cancellation Test (TP); Min score=0; Max score=dependent on patients' performance during a 10-min time frame; A higher work efficiency index means a better outcome, whereas a higher dispersion index means a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) (Quality of life)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the World Health Organization Quality of life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref); Min score=0; Max score=100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory; (IAFAI). Min score=0; Max score=100; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (Depressive symptomatology)Baseline (1 week before the beginning of the intervention), post-intervention (7 weeks) and follow-up (3-months)Change from baseline in the BDI-II; Min score=0; Max score=63; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026