Skip to content

Effect of Acidic Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Dinoprostone for Labor Induction

Effect of Acidic Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Dinoprostone (PGE2) Vaginal Tablet for Labor Induction in Full Term Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05100264
Enrollment
230
Registered
2021-10-29
Start date
2021-10-29
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induced; Birth, Labor, Induced

Keywords

labor induction, dinoprostone, vaginal pH

Brief summary

Acidification of vaginal pH has been proposed as a potential factor that could help increase the efficacy of vaginal prostaglandins in labor induction. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of an acidic vaginal pH on the progress of labor induction with dinoprostone (Prostaglandin E2 - PGE2) vaginal tablet.

Interventions

OTHERVaginal washing with 5% acetic acid

Induction of labor (vaginal tablet dinoprostone and vaginal washing with 5% acetic acid)

OTHERVaginal washing with 0.9% NS

Induction of labor (vaginal tablet dinoprostone and vaginal washing 0.9% NS)

Sponsors

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
CollaboratorOTHER
Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Randomization will be computer generated. Allocation concealment will be ensured by opaque sealed envelopes. Blinding of outcomes assessor, principal as well as other investigators will be ensured as randomization will be performed by an external investigator that will not participate in the clinical process of the study or the statistical analysis. The ward midwife will open the randomization envelope after patient enrollment and different types of vaginal washing will be applied as per randomization. Participant as well outcomes assessor (physician that will evaluate the progress of labor as well statistician involved in the analysis) will be blinded to the procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton pregnancy * Full term (\>37 weeks) * Cephalic presentation * Reactive NST (nonstress test) * Absence of spontaneous uterine contractions * No contraindications to vaginal delivery

Exclusion criteria

* Multifetal pregnancy * Fetal malpresentation * Preterm delivery (\<37 weeks) * Advanced maternal age (\>40 years) * Bishop score \> 7 * Fetal macrosomia ( \>4500 gr) * Non reassuring NST (nonstress test) * Suspected chorioamnionitis * Previous cesarean delivery or other uterine surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interval from induction to delivery36 hoursTime interval (minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interval from induction to active labor36 hoursTime interval (minutes)
Interval from induction to second stage of labor36 hoursTime interval (minutes)
Failure of induction of labor36 hoursRate of participants with failure of induction of labor

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026