Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trial of Game Changers

Controlled Trial of Game Changers: A Group Intervention to Train HIV Clients to be Change Agents for HIV Prevention in Uganda

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05098015
Enrollment
809
Registered
2021-10-28
Start date
2022-01-24
Completion date
2024-10-25
Last updated
2026-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Prevention

Brief summary

The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Game Changers, an 8-session peer-led group intervention that aims to empower and mobilize people living with HIV (PLWH) to be agents for HIV prevention in their social networks.

Detailed description

This RCT of Game Changers, a peer-led group intervention for persons living with HIV (PLWH) in Uganda, will test intervention effects on the primary outcomes of reduced condomless sex, increased HIV testing, and decreased enacted HIV stigma among social network members. We will recruit 210 PLWH, randomizing 105 to the intervention and 105 to an attention control. Each PLWH will be asked to recruit up to 4 social network members to complete assessments (736 total, 368/arm). All participants will complete surveys at baseline and 6-, 12-, and 18-months post-baseline.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGame Changers

8-session group intervention that uses didactic instruction, role plays and experience sharing to empower participants to engage in HIV prevention advocacy.

Sponsors

Infectious Diseases Institute, Uganda
CollaboratorOTHER
Makerere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
RAND
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The assessment interviewer will be blinded to study arm allocation of the participants at baseline only.

Intervention model description

Individual randomization of index participants (and their recruited alter participants) to one of two parallel groups, the intervention or usual care (no intervention) control group. Therefore there are 4 study groups: index intervention, alter intervention, index control and alter control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 18 years and older * HIV-positive * in HIV care at The Infectious DIseases Institute for at least one year

Exclusion criteria

* Participated in the prior pilot study of the intervention. * Has significant cognitive impairment * Health status is not sufficiently stable to reliably complete 18 month study. * Does not speak Luganda fluently (index participant); English or Luganda fluently (social network participant) * spouse/partner or household member are enrolled as index participant in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV TestingData regarding HIV testing over the past 6 months, assessed at each follow-up assessment (Months 6, 12, 18)For each index participant (PLWH), data is examined from their enrolled alters and the percent of these alters who self-reported HIV testing behavior (yes/no) at each follow-up assessment is calculated, followed by the average percent across all follow-up assessments. Therefore, data from all three follow-up timepoints (months 6, 12 18) were pooled and an average calculated across the timepoints.
Condom UseReports of always using condoms in the past 6 months, as assessed at each follow-up assessment (Month 6, Month 12, Month 18)For each index participant (PLWH), data is examined from their enrolled alters and the percent of these alters who self-reported always using condoms use during intercourse at each follow-up assessment is calculated, followed by the average percentage across all follow-up assessments. Therefore, data from all three follow-up timepoints (months 6, 12 18) were pooled and an average calculated across the timepoints.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Internalized HIV StigmaReported at each follow-up assessment (Months 6, 12, 18)This outcome is based solely on data from the index participants. Self-reported internalized HIV stigma (on 1-5 scale, with higher scores represented greater stigma); scale score is averaged across all follow-up assessments
HIV Prevention AdvocacyPast 6 months as assessed at each follow-up (Months 6, 12, 18)This outcome is based solely on data from the index participants. Self-reported prevention advocacy (on 1-5 scale, with higher scores representing greater engagement in advocacy); scores are averaged across all follow-up assessments

Countries

Uganda

Participant flow

Recruitment details

PLWH are the index participants, and each enrolled index participant was asked to recruit up to 4 social network members (alters) to also enroll in the study.

Pre-assignment details

Both index participants (PLWH) and alter participants were enrolled; as all index participants were asked to recruit up to 4 alters, each index participant may have any where from 0 to 4 alters enrolled in the study. 210 index (PLWH) participants enrolled and 599 alters enrolled. The flowchart includes statistics on the number of index and alter participants enrolled and completed within each arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention- Index
8-session group intervention to train index participants to engage in HIV prevention advocacy. Game Changers: 8-session group intervention that uses didactic instruction, role plays and experience sharing to empower participants to engage in HIV prevention advocacy.
105
Usual Care Control- Index
Participants will receive HIV usual care, and no added intervention.
105
Usual Care Control- Alter
Alter participants recruited by enrolled index participants assigned to the usual care control group
275
Intervention- Alter
Alter participants recruited by enrolled index participants assigned to the intervention group; however, these alter participants did not receive any intervention
324
Total809

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath1130
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1133
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention- IndexTotalIntervention- AlterUsual Care Control- AlterUsual Care Control- Index
Age, Continuous40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
36.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
39.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
105 Participants809 Participants324 Participants275 Participants105 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
74 Participants544 Participants223 Participants174 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants265 Participants101 Participants101 Participants32 Participants
Time since HIV diagnosis10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
11.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
11.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1051 / 1050 / 2753 / 324
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1050 / 1050 / 2750 / 324
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1050 / 1050 / 2750 / 324

Outcome results

Primary

Condom Use

For each index participant (PLWH), data is examined from their enrolled alters and the percent of these alters who self-reported always using condoms use during intercourse at each follow-up assessment is calculated, followed by the average percentage across all follow-up assessments. Therefore, data from all three follow-up timepoints (months 6, 12 18) were pooled and an average calculated across the timepoints.

Time frame: Reports of always using condoms in the past 6 months, as assessed at each follow-up assessment (Month 6, Month 12, Month 18)

Population: The Participant Flow included data from all index (PLWH) and alter participants, while the outcome measures are based on index-level measures-- for each index participant, the measure reflects data reported by their enrolled alters. Index participants were included in the analysis if (a) at least one of their alters reported engaging in sexual intercourse in the 6 months prior to the assessment; and (b) data was available in at least one of the follow-up assessments

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention- IndexCondom Use18.04 percentage of altersStandard Deviation 29.6
Usual Care Control- IndexCondom Use13.15 percentage of altersStandard Deviation 27.06
p-value: 0.16Regression, Linear
Primary

HIV Testing

For each index participant (PLWH), data is examined from their enrolled alters and the percent of these alters who self-reported HIV testing behavior (yes/no) at each follow-up assessment is calculated, followed by the average percent across all follow-up assessments. Therefore, data from all three follow-up timepoints (months 6, 12 18) were pooled and an average calculated across the timepoints.

Time frame: Data regarding HIV testing over the past 6 months, assessed at each follow-up assessment (Months 6, 12, 18)

Population: The Participant Flow included data from all index (PLWH) and alter participants, while the outcome measures are based on index-level measures-- for each index participant, the measure reflects data reported by their enrolled alters. For this specific measure (HIV testing), index participants provided data for analysis if (a) at least one of their alters was not living with HIV at the time of the assessment; and (2) data was present in at least one of the follow-up assessments

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention- IndexHIV Testing71.60 percentage of altersStandard Deviation 35.23
Usual Care Control- IndexHIV Testing71.61 percentage of altersStandard Deviation 37.19
p-value: 0.95Regression, Linear
Secondary

HIV Prevention Advocacy

This outcome is based solely on data from the index participants. Self-reported prevention advocacy (on 1-5 scale, with higher scores representing greater engagement in advocacy); scores are averaged across all follow-up assessments

Time frame: Past 6 months as assessed at each follow-up (Months 6, 12, 18)

Population: The Participant Flow included data from all index (PLWH) and alter participants, but this measure was only assessed among index participants. Index participants were included in the analysis if they provided data on the measure in at least one follow-up assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention- IndexHIV Prevention Advocacy3.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Usual Care Control- IndexHIV Prevention Advocacy2.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Internalized HIV Stigma

This outcome is based solely on data from the index participants. Self-reported internalized HIV stigma (on 1-5 scale, with higher scores represented greater stigma); scale score is averaged across all follow-up assessments

Time frame: Reported at each follow-up assessment (Months 6, 12, 18)

Population: The Participant Flow included data from all index (PLWH) and alter participants, but this measure was only assessed among index participants. Index participants were included in the analysis if they provided data on the measure in at least one follow-up assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention- IndexInternalized HIV Stigma1.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Usual Care Control- IndexInternalized HIV Stigma2.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026