Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Conditions
Keywords
Muscular Dystrophies, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, DMD, North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), Ambulatory, Pediatric, Gene-Delivery
Brief summary
The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of gene transfer therapy in boys with DMD. It is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The participants who are randomized to the placebo arm will have an opportunity for treatment with gene transfer therapy at the beginning of the second year.
Interventions
Single IV infusion of delandistrogene moxeparvovec.
Single IV infusion of matching placebo.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Is ambulatory and from 4 to under 8 years of age at time of randomization. * Definitive diagnosis of DMD based on documented clinical findings and prior genetic testing. * Ability to cooperate with motor assessment testing. * Stable daily dose of oral corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks prior to Screening, and the dose is expected to remain constant throughout the study (except for modifications to accommodate changes in weight). * rAAVrh74 antibody titers are not elevated as per protocol-specified requirements. * A pathogenic frameshift mutation or premature stop codon contained between exons 18 and 79 (inclusive), with the exception of mutation fully contained within exon 45.
Exclusion criteria
* Exposure to gene therapy, investigational medication, or any treatment designed to increase dystrophin expression within protocol specified time limits. * Abnormality in protocol-specified diagnostic evaluations or laboratory tests. * Presence of any other clinically significant illness, medical condition, or requirement for chronic drug treatment that in the opinion of the Investigator creates unnecessary risk for gene transfer. Other inclusion or
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | The NSAA is a healthcare provider administered scale that rates performance of various motor abilities in ambulant children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and is used to monitor disease progression and treatment effects. During assessment, participants are asked to perform 17 different functional activities that are graded as: 2 - Normal - no obvious modification of activity; 1 - Modified method but achieves goal independent of assistance; 0 - Unable to achieve independently. The NSAA total score is defined as the sum of all 17 items, ranging from 0 (worst) to 34 (best). The response vector consists of the change from baseline in NSAA total score at the post-baseline visit. The model includes the covariates of treatment group, visit, treatment group by visit interaction, age group, baseline NSAA total score, and baseline NSAA total score by visit interaction. All covariates are fixed effects in this analysis. An increase in score indicates an improvement in motor function. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Rise From the Floor at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | The time to rise from the floor test quantifies the time required for the participant to stand in an upright position with arms by sides, starting from the supine position with arms by sides. Data are presented for the change from baseline to Week 52 in the time taken (in seconds) to rise from the floor. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 10 Meter Walk/Run (10MWR) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | The timed 10MWR quantifies the time required for the participant to run or walk 10 meters (on a straight walkway) from a standing position. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the 10MWR. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 100 Meter Walk/Run (100MWR) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | The timed 100MWR quantifies the time required for the participant to run or walk 100 meters (on a straight walkway) from a standing position. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the 100MWR. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Timed Stair Ascend 4 Steps Test at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | The timed stair ascend 4 steps test quantifies the time required for the participant to ascend 4 standard steps (each step was 6 inches in height). Data presented is the change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) to ascend 4 steps. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in Stride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | Each participant was provided with wearable devices to collect data on stride velocity. Participants wore a device on each ankle. SV95C data was derived based on stride velocity. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in SV95C. |
| Part 1: Quantity of Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Dystrophin Protein Expression at Week 12 as Measured by Western Blot Adjusted by Muscle Content | Week 12 | Quantity of delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein levels (in muscle biopsy samples) were determined by Western blot at Part 1, Week 12. For this endpoint, 2 blocks of tissues were analyzed by Western blot, each with 2 technical replicates to determine the delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein level (percent control). The block average value from 2 technical replicates was computed. The overall average was calculated as the mean of the block average values. The overall average values were used for the analysis. Dystrophin protein was measured and then adjusted based on the percentage of muscle content in the biopsy sample. An increase in protein expression indicates production of the delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Score in Upper Extremity Function to Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | PROMIS is a family of instruments developed and validated to assess health-related quality of life, including upper extremity function. Upper extremity function scores ranged from 1 (not able to do so \[worst upper extremity function\]) to 5 (no trouble \[best upper extremity function\]), where higher scores indicate a better clinical outcome. |
| Part 1: Number of Skills Gained or Improved at Week 52 as Measured by the NSAA | Week 52 (Part 1) | The NSAA is a clinician-administered scale that rates performance on various functional activities. As measured by the NSAA, data was collected for the number of skills gained (the average item score was 0 at Baseline and \> 0 at Part 1 Week 52) or improved (the average item score at Baseline was \> 0 but less than the average item score at Part 1 Week 52). As pre-specified, data are presented for the combined number of skills gained or improved at Week 52. |
| Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Up to 104 weeks | TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during treatment, having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pretreatment state. SAEs were defined as any adverse event that resulted in death, was life threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section. |
| Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Up to 104 weeks | AESIs were defined as adverse events (AEs) of special interest, based on pre-specified criteria and pertain to categories labeled hepatotoxicity, immune-mediated myositis, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), hypersensitivity, thrombocytopenia, rhabdomyolysis, and troponin I elevations. The data represent the number of participants who experienced an event within the specified AESI category as observed by the principal investigator (PI), after adjudication. Per prespecified analysis, AESI data were only collected based on the specified AESI categories. A Summary of all SAEs and nonserious AEs (Other), regardless of causality and regardless of the AESI category, is located in the Reported Adverse Events section. |
| Part 1: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score in Mobility to Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1) | PROMIS is a family of instruments developed and validated to assess health-related quality of life, including mobility. Mobility function scores ranged from 1 (worst mobility function) to 5 (best mobility function), where higher scores indicate a better clinical outcome. |
Countries
Belgium, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
126 participants were enrolled in the study. 1 of the 126 participants was enrolled via a country-specific protocol addendum. Data are presented below for the 125 participants enrolled via the global protocol.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo Participants received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of delandistrogene moxeparvovec on Day 1 of Part 1. Then, participants received a single IV infusion of matching placebo on Day 1 in Part 2. | 63 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Participants received a single IV infusion of matching placebo on Day 1 of Part 1. Then, participants received a single IV infusion of delandistrogene moxeparvovec on Day 1 in Part 2. | 62 |
| Total | 125 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 2 | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Total | Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 6.08 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05 | 6.03 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.05 | 5.98 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 8 Participants | 23 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 53 Participants | 100 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 11 Participants | 19 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black of African American | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized More than One Race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 46 Participants | 95 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 62 Participants | 125 Participants | 63 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 63 | 0 / 62 | 0 / 63 | 0 / 60 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 62 / 63 | 57 / 62 | 52 / 63 | 55 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 14 / 63 | 5 / 62 | 5 / 63 | 8 / 60 |
Outcome results
Part 1: Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 52
The NSAA is a healthcare provider administered scale that rates performance of various motor abilities in ambulant children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and is used to monitor disease progression and treatment effects. During assessment, participants are asked to perform 17 different functional activities that are graded as: 2 - Normal - no obvious modification of activity; 1 - Modified method but achieves goal independent of assistance; 0 - Unable to achieve independently. The NSAA total score is defined as the sum of all 17 items, ranging from 0 (worst) to 34 (best). The response vector consists of the change from baseline in NSAA total score at the post-baseline visit. The model includes the covariates of treatment group, visit, treatment group by visit interaction, age group, baseline NSAA total score, and baseline NSAA total score by visit interaction. All covariates are fixed effects in this analysis. An increase in score indicates an improvement in motor function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 52 | 2.57 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 52 | 1.92 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score in Mobility to Week 52
PROMIS is a family of instruments developed and validated to assess health-related quality of life, including mobility. Mobility function scores ranged from 1 (worst mobility function) to 5 (best mobility function), where higher scores indicate a better clinical outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score in Mobility to Week 52 | 0.05 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score in Mobility to Week 52 | -0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.05 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Score in Upper Extremity Function to Week 52
PROMIS is a family of instruments developed and validated to assess health-related quality of life, including upper extremity function. Upper extremity function scores ranged from 1 (not able to do so \[worst upper extremity function\]) to 5 (no trouble \[best upper extremity function\]), where higher scores indicate a better clinical outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Score in Upper Extremity Function to Week 52 | 0.19 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Score in Upper Extremity Function to Week 52 | 0.23 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Stride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) at Week 52
Each participant was provided with wearable devices to collect data on stride velocity. Participants wore a device on each ankle. SV95C data was derived based on stride velocity. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in SV95C.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Stride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) at Week 52 | 0.06 meters (m)/second (s) | Standard Error 0.03 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Stride Velocity 95th Centile (SV95C) at Week 52 | -0.03 meters (m)/second (s) | Standard Error 0.03 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Timed Stair Ascend 4 Steps Test at Week 52
The timed stair ascend 4 steps test quantifies the time required for the participant to ascend 4 standard steps (each step was 6 inches in height). Data presented is the change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) to ascend 4 steps.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Timed Stair Ascend 4 Steps Test at Week 52 | -0.44 Seconds | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Timed Stair Ascend 4 Steps Test at Week 52 | -0.08 Seconds | Standard Error 0.13 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 100 Meter Walk/Run (100MWR) at Week 52
The timed 100MWR quantifies the time required for the participant to run or walk 100 meters (on a straight walkway) from a standing position. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the 100MWR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 100 Meter Walk/Run (100MWR) at Week 52 | -6.57 Seconds | Standard Error 1.76 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 100 Meter Walk/Run (100MWR) at Week 52 | -3.28 Seconds | Standard Error 1.8 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 10 Meter Walk/Run (10MWR) at Week 52
The timed 10MWR quantifies the time required for the participant to run or walk 10 meters (on a straight walkway) from a standing position. Data are presented for change from baseline to Week 52 in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the 10MWR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 10 Meter Walk/Run (10MWR) at Week 52 | -0.34 Seconds | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Complete 10 Meter Walk/Run (10MWR) at Week 52 | 0.08 Seconds | Standard Error 0.1 |
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Rise From the Floor at Week 52
The time to rise from the floor test quantifies the time required for the participant to stand in an upright position with arms by sides, starting from the supine position with arms by sides. Data are presented for the change from baseline to Week 52 in the time taken (in seconds) to rise from the floor.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Rise From the Floor at Week 52 | -0.27 Seconds | Standard Error 0.15 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Change From Baseline in Time to Rise From the Floor at Week 52 | 0.37 Seconds | Standard Error 0.15 |
Part 1: Number of Skills Gained or Improved at Week 52 as Measured by the NSAA
The NSAA is a clinician-administered scale that rates performance on various functional activities. As measured by the NSAA, data was collected for the number of skills gained (the average item score was 0 at Baseline and \> 0 at Part 1 Week 52) or improved (the average item score at Baseline was \> 0 but less than the average item score at Part 1 Week 52). As pre-specified, data are presented for the combined number of skills gained or improved at Week 52.
Time frame: Week 52 (Part 1)
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Number of Skills Gained or Improved at Week 52 as Measured by the NSAA | 4.18 number of skills | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Number of Skills Gained or Improved at Week 52 as Measured by the NSAA | 3.99 number of skills | Standard Error 0.31 |
Part 1: Quantity of Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Dystrophin Protein Expression at Week 12 as Measured by Western Blot Adjusted by Muscle Content
Quantity of delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein levels (in muscle biopsy samples) were determined by Western blot at Part 1, Week 12. For this endpoint, 2 blocks of tissues were analyzed by Western blot, each with 2 technical replicates to determine the delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein level (percent control). The block average value from 2 technical replicates was computed. The overall average was calculated as the mean of the block average values. The overall average values were used for the analysis. Dystrophin protein was measured and then adjusted based on the percentage of muscle content in the biopsy sample. An increase in protein expression indicates production of the delandistrogene moxeparvovec dystrophin protein.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Measured in the mITT Population, which included all randomized participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to randomization. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed= number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Part 1: Quantity of Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Dystrophin Protein Expression at Week 12 as Measured by Western Blot Adjusted by Muscle Content | 34.29 Percent control | Standard Deviation 41.04 |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Part 1: Quantity of Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Dystrophin Protein Expression at Week 12 as Measured by Western Blot Adjusted by Muscle Content | 0.00 Percent control | Standard Deviation 0 |
Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
AESIs were defined as adverse events (AEs) of special interest, based on pre-specified criteria and pertain to categories labeled hepatotoxicity, immune-mediated myositis, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), hypersensitivity, thrombocytopenia, rhabdomyolysis, and troponin I elevations. The data represent the number of participants who experienced an event within the specified AESI category as observed by the principal investigator (PI), after adjudication. Per prespecified analysis, AESI data were only collected based on the specified AESI categories. A Summary of all SAEs and nonserious AEs (Other), regardless of causality and regardless of the AESI category, is located in the Reported Adverse Events section.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
Population: Measured in the Safety Population in Part 1, which included all participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to the treatment they received. Measured in the SRP-treated population in Part 2, which included all participants who received investigational study treatment (delandistrogene moxeparvovec) in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hepatotoxicity | 12 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Rhabdomyolysis | 1 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Thrombocytopenia | 2 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Immune-mediated Myositis | 0 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Troponin I elevations | 2 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | TMA | 0 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hypersensitivity | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Rhabdomyolysis | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hypersensitivity | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | TMA | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Thrombocytopenia | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Troponin I elevations | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Immune-mediated Myositis | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hepatotoxicity | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hypersensitivity | 1 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hepatotoxicity | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Immune-mediated Myositis | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | TMA | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Thrombocytopenia | 1 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Rhabdomyolysis | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Troponin I elevations | 14 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | TMA | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Troponin I elevations | 8 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Rhabdomyolysis | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Immune-mediated Myositis | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hepatotoxicity | 14 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Thrombocytopenia | 0 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) | Hypersensitivity | 0 Participants |
Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during treatment, having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pretreatment state. SAEs were defined as any adverse event that resulted in death, was life threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Time frame: Up to 104 weeks
Population: Measured in the Safety Population in Part 1, which included all participants who received study treatment, with treatment group designated according to the treatment they received. Measured in the SRP-treated population in Part 2, which included all participants who received investigational study treatment (delandistrogene moxeparvovec) in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 62 Participants |
| Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Followed by Placebo | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 14 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Placebo Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 57 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 53 Participants |
| Part 2: Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 1 Followed by Placebo in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 56 Participants |
| Part 2: Placebo in Part 1 Followed by Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec in Part 2 | Parts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 8 Participants |