Skip to content

Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block

Trocar-site Infiltration With Ropivacaine Versus Tranversus Abdominis Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-blinded, Randomized-controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05094193
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-10-26
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

Acute pain management, Ropivacaine, Trocar-site infiltration, TAP-block, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Brief summary

For symptomatic gall bladder disorders (cholelithiasis and cholecystitis), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered as the gold standard treatment. However, these minimally invasive technique is associated with acute moderate pain during the 24 hours postoperative, which is routinely managed using opioids. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy. Besides, Wang et al found that TAP block is more effective than a conventional pain control, but not significatively different from another local incisional pain control that is port site infiltration.So, the aim of this study, is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of trocar-site infiltration with ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided TAP block following laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used as part of multimodal analgesia.

Interventions

PROCEDURETrocar-site infiltration

20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 6 mm trocar site)

PROCEDURETAP block

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side

PROCEDURETrocar site infiltration placebo

20 mL of normal saline

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side

Sponsors

Tunis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BMI \< 30 kg/m2 * Scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy * ASA grade I, II and III

Exclusion criteria

* Bile duct exploration, insertion of a T-drain or patients with acute cholecystitis * Conversion to open cholecystectomy or if the surgery exceeded 200 minutes * Severe systemic disease * Patients on analgesics for any reason * History of allergy to local anesthetics * An ongoing pregnancy * Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute postoperative painup to 24 hoursVisual analog scale (VAS) 0: no pain to 10: severe pain at rest and cough
Total opioid consumptionDay 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative nausea and vomitingDay 1
Postoperative complicationup to 1 weekIleus, wound infection, wound abscess
Incidence of shoulder painDay 1
Patient satisfaction and quality of recoveryDay 1QoR-40 questionnaire
Length of hospital stayup to 1 week

Countries

Tunisia

Contacts

Primary ContactDAGHMOURI Mohamed Aziz, M.D
aziz.daghmouri@gmail.com0029442474

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026