Skip to content

A Phase III, Open-Label Study of Maintenance Lurbinectedin in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab in Participants With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Lurbinectedin in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab as Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Following First-Line Induction Therapy With Carboplatin, Etoposide and Atezolizumab

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05091567
Acronym
IMforte
Enrollment
660
Registered
2021-10-25
Start date
2021-11-18
Completion date
2028-02-28
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

Study GO43104 is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of lurbinectedin in combination with atezolizumab compared with atezolizumab alone administered as maintenance therapy in participants with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) after first-line induction therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. The study consists of 2 phases: an induction phase and a maintenance phase. Participants need to have an ongoing response or stable disease per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 criteria after completion of 4 cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab induction treatment in order to be considered for eligibility screening for the maintenance phase. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab or atezolizumab in the maintenance phase.

Interventions

DRUGAtezolizumab

Atezolizumab will be administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles in the induction phase. Atezolizumab will be administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in the maintenance phase.

DRUGLurbinectedin

Lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² will be administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in the maintenance phase.

DRUGCarboplatin

Carboplatin will be administered according to the standard of care treatment for 4 cycles in the induction phase.

DRUGEtoposide

Etoposide will be administered according to the standard of care treatment for 4 cycles in the induction phase.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for the Induction Phase: * ECOG PS of 0 or 1 * No prior systemic therapy for ES-SCLC * Treatment-free for at least 6 months since last chemo/radiotherapy, among those treated (with curative intent) with prior chemo/radiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC * Histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC * Adequate hematologic and end-organ function to receive 4 cycles of induction treatment with carboplatin, etoposide and atezolizumab * Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1 * Negative HIV test and no evidence of active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C at screening

Exclusion criteria

for the Induction Phase: * Presence or history of CNS metastases * Active or history of autoimmune disease or deficiency * History of malignancies other than SCLC within 5 years prior to enrollment * Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies, or lurbinectedin or trabectedin * History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest computed tomography (CT) scan * Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to enrollment Inclusion Criteria for the Maintenance Phase: * ECOG PS of 0 or 1 * Ongoing response or stable disease per RECIST 1.1 after 4 cycles of induction therapy * Toxicities attributed to prior induction anti-cancer therapy or PCI resolved to Grade \<=1 * Adequate hematologic and end-organ function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)Up to 26 monthsPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimetres (mm).
Randomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)Up to 26 monthsOS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Randomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFSUp to 26 monthsPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Randomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRFUp to 26 monthsORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the IRF using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. Percentages have been rounded off.
Randomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the InvestigatorUp to 26 monthsORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of CR or PR as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD.
Randomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRFUp to 26 monthsDOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by IRF assessment using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Randomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the InvestigatorUp to 26 monthsDOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 MonthsMonths 6 and 12PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 MonthsMonths 6 and 12PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With OS at 12 Months and 24 MonthsMonths 12 and 24OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months after randomization. Percentages have been rounded off.
Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Up to 26 monthsAn AE =any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values/abnormal clinical test results), symptoms/disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether considered related to the pharmaceutical product. SAE=any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect that is fatal or life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. AESI= drug induced liver injury, suspected transmission of infectious agent via study treatment, hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypersensitivity, etc. AESIs may include events not specified in the protocol.
Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to AtezolizumabUp to 26 monthsFor determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed at least one positive post-baseline ADA result during the randomized phase, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result.
Randomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)Up to 26 monthsEORTC QLQ-C30=30 questions assessing 5 aspects of participant functioning(physical,emotional,role,cognitive \&social),3 symptom scales,GHS/QoL \& 6 single items.PF scale=5 questions about participants PF \& daily activities(strenuous activities,long walks,short walks,bed/chair rest \& needing help with eating,dressing,washing themselves/using the toilet).PF scale scored on 4-point scale(1=Not at All-4=Very Much).GHS/QoL scored on 7-point scale(1=Very Poor- 7=Excellent).Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0-100,higher scores=higher response level \& better QoL.TTCD for PF \& GHS/QoL=time from the date of randomization until first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration,which is decrease from baseline in PF/GHS score that must be held for at least 2 consecutive assessments/initial decrease above baseline followed by death attributable to cancer progression within 6 weeks of the last deteriorated assessment.Score change≥10-point change in subscale score,considered meaningful.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trials

Hoffmann-La Roche

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 660 participants with ES SCLC took part in the study across 96 investigative sites in 13 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The study consists of 2 phases, an enrollment phase (induction phase), where participants received standard of care treatment with carboplatin, etoposide and atezolizumab, and a randomized phase (maintenance phase), where participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab + lurbinectedin or atezolizumab. The study is ongoing.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atezolizumab
Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, Q3W as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until unacceptable toxicity or PD whichever occurred first.
241
Atezolizumab+ Lurbinectedin
Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, Q3W, as IV infusion and lurbinectedin, 3.2 mg/m\^2, Q3W, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle until unacceptable toxicity or PD whichever occurred first.
242
Total483

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtezolizumab+ LurbinectedinTotalAtezolizumab
Age, Continuous65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
206 Participants416 Participants210 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
20 Participants35 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
31 Participants62 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
195 Participants394 Participants199 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants181 Participants90 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants302 Participants151 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
54 / 660135 / 241113 / 242
other
Total, other adverse events
526 / 653127 / 240213 / 242
serious
Total, serious adverse events
181 / 65341 / 24075 / 242

Outcome results

Primary

Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimetres (mm).

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)2.14 months95% Confidence Interval 1.64
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)5.36 months95% Confidence Interval 4.24
Comparison: Stratified Analysis: The stratification factors were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) at randomization (0 vs. 1); Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at randomization (\<=upper limit of normal (ULN) vs \>ULN) via local laboratory test; Presence of liver metastases at enrollment (yes vs. no); Prior receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (yes vs. no).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.43, 0.67]Log Rank
Primary

Randomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)10.64 months95% Confidence Interval 9.49
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)13.24 months95% Confidence Interval 11.89
Comparison: Stratified Analysis: The stratification factors were ECOG PS at randomization (0 vs. 1); LDH at randomization (\<=ULN vs \>ULN) via local laboratory test; Presence of liver metastases at enrollment (yes vs. no); Prior receipt of PCI (yes vs. no).p-value: =0.017495% CI: [0.57, 0.95]Log Rank
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the IRF using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. Percentages have been rounded off.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with measurable disease at baseline, as assessed by IRF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF10.4 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 6.4
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF19.4 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 13.85
Comparison: Stratified Analysis: The stratification factors were ECOGPS at randomization (0 vs. 1);LDH at randomization (\<=ULN vs \>ULN) via local laboratory test; Presence of liver metastases at enrollment (yes vs. no); Prior receipt of PCI (yes vs. no).95% CI: [1.07, 16.9]
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of CR or PR as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with measurable disease at baseline, as assessed by investigator.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator13.2 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 8.86
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator17.1 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 12.19
Comparison: Stratified Analysis: The stratification factors were ECOGPS at randomization (0 vs. 1);LDH at randomization (\<=ULNvs \>ULN) via local laboratory test; Presence of liver metastases at enrollment (yes vs. no); Prior receipt of PCI (yes vs. no).95% CI: [-3.51, 11.32]
Secondary

Randomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator

DOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with response, per investigator.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator11.93 months
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator5.75 months
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF

DOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by IRF assessment using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with response, per IRF.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF5.62 months
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF9.00 months
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFS

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFS2.73 months95% Confidence Interval 2.53
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFS5.36 months95% Confidence Interval 4.3
Comparison: Stratified Analysis: The stratification factors were ECOG PS at randomization (0 vs. 1); LDH at randomization (\<=ULN vs \>ULN) via local laboratory test; Presence of liver metastases at enrollment (yes vs. no); Prior receipt of PCI (yes vs. no).95% CI: [0.45, 0.68]
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

An AE =any unfavorable & unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values/abnormal clinical test results), symptoms/disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether considered related to the pharmaceutical product. SAE=any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect that is fatal or life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. AESI= drug induced liver injury, suspected transmission of infectious agent via study treatment, hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypersensitivity, etc. AESIs may include events not specified in the protocol.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: Saftey analysis set (SAS)=all participants who were randomized \& received at least 1 dose of atezolizumab/lurbinectedin.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)SAEs41 Participants
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESIs for Lurbinectedin62 Participants
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESIs for Atezolizumab54 Participants
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AEs194 Participants
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AEs235 Participants
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)SAEs75 Participants
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESIs for Atezolizumab76 Participants
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESIs for Lurbinectedin93 Participants
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab

For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed at least one positive post-baseline ADA result during the randomized phase, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: ADA-evaluable population was defined as participants with at least one post-dose evaluable ADA sample (collected in the randomized phase).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab20 Participants
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab19 Participants
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With OS at 12 Months and 24 Months

OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months after randomization. Percentages have been rounded off.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Secondary

Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months

PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.

Time frame: Months 6 and 12

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months18.66 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 13.45
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months12.03 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 7.27
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months20.54 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 14.37
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months41.22 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 34.58
95% CI: [14.12, 31]
95% CI: [0.72, 16.31]
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months

PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.

Time frame: Months 6 and 12

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months22.56 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 17.12
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months12.80 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 8.07
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months6 Months46.21 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 39.6
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months12 Months20.32 percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 14.33
95% CI: [15.09, 32.2]
95% CI: [-0.11, 15.16]
Secondary

Randomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)

EORTC QLQ-C30=30 questions assessing 5 aspects of participant functioning(physical,emotional,role,cognitive &social),3 symptom scales,GHS/QoL & 6 single items.PF scale=5 questions about participants PF & daily activities(strenuous activities,long walks,short walks,bed/chair rest & needing help with eating,dressing,washing themselves/using the toilet).PF scale scored on 4-point scale(1=Not at All-4=Very Much).GHS/QoL scored on 7-point scale(1=Very Poor- 7=Excellent).Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0-100,higher scores=higher response level & better QoL.TTCD for PF & GHS/QoL=time from the date of randomization until first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration,which is decrease from baseline in PF/GHS score that must be held for at least 2 consecutive assessments/initial decrease above baseline followed by death attributable to cancer progression within 6 weeks of the last deteriorated assessment.Score change≥10-point change in subscale score,considered meaningful.

Time frame: Up to 26 months

Population: FAS included all participants randomized into the randomized phase, regardless of whether or not the assigned study treatment was received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)TTCD for PFNA months
AtezolizumabRandomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)TTCD for GHS/QoL12.9 months
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)TTCD for PF15.9 months
Atezolizumab+ LurbinectedinRandomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)TTCD for GHS/QoL10.8 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026