Hiv
Conditions
Keywords
Men who have sex with men (MSM), Transgender women (TGW), Sex workers, Healthcare, Community-based organisations, PrEP, Pre-exposition prophylaxis, focus group, interview, Cambodia, qualitative, acceptability, prevention, men who have sex with men, decision makers, community workers
Brief summary
Hypothesis: * Hypothesis 1 : Regarding the recentness of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation with an uptake of 20% and according to the first consultative meeting, awareness and acceptability of PrEP seems to be low in key-populations of Cambodia * Hypothesis 2 : Individual, social and structural barriers and facilitating factors of PrEP implementation as perceived by health workers and community-based organizations would be similar to what was observed worldwide 4,8. * Hypothesis 3: Some subgroups of key-populations are difficult to reach in health facilities. Community organizations can play a critical role to provide PrEP information, initiation and counselling with the support of new technologies. * Hypothesis 4: Community organizations might lack financial, logistical and skill capacities to deliver PrEP in good conditions Main objective: • To qualitatively evaluate the knowledge, awareness, perception, experience and acceptability of PrEP among key populations (entertainment workers (EW), men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender women (TW)), and among healthcare and community workers in charge of key populations Secondary objectives: * To better understand the characteristics, needs and expectations of community-based organizations (CBOs), in order to define the optimal conditions for community-based PrEP implementation * To identify tools that could be useful to increase PrEP awareness and acceptability, especially new technologies (apps, websites) Methodology: Qualitative study Focus groups with key-populations, healthcare and community workers Semi-directive interviews with decision makers and policy makers Estimated enrolment: 10 participants per focus group, 8 focus groups, 80 participants in focus groups, 6 interviewed persons, 86 participants in total Study population: Men who have sex with men (MSM), entertainment workers (EW), transgender women (TGW), healthcare workers, community workers, decision and policy makers
Interventions
OTHERQualitative assessment about PrEP acceptability
Qualitative research among key-populations, community and healthcare workers, and decision and policy makers, including focus group and semi-directive interviews
Sponsors
University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
National Center for HIV/AIDS Dermatology and STDs, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Eligibility criteria for key-populations included in focus groups * All key-populations * Having consented to participate into the research * Self-declared negative HIV status * Men who have sex with men (MSM): being sexually active and having had anal sex with at least one male (including TGW women) partner in the past 12 months. * Transgender women (TGW): Being biologically male at birth and self-identified as a woman or third gender, reporting having anal sex with at least one male in the past 12 months * Male entertainment workers (MEW): having at least one sexual intercourse in exchange of money in the last month. MEW are engaged in transactional sex by Facebook, via online App (Grinder, Blue) and massage parlor. * Female entertainment workers: Venue-based (work in entertainment establishment) or non-venue based (freelance/street-based or park-based) women having at least one sexual intercourse in exchange of money in the last month. Venue-based EW (VEW) are defined as EW engaged in transactional sex for supplementary income which are employees in entertainment venues such as karaokes, bars, beer gardens, massage parlours. Free-lance EW (FEW) are defined as EW engaged in transactional sex in short-time hotel or public parks21 or high-class EW working in salons or using apps such as Line. We hypothesized that FEW and VEW have different sex behaviours as well as different perceptions and motivations towards PrEP. * PrEP users: MSM or TGW who have started medical PrEP in the pilot program Khmer PrEP and MSM or TGW who have independently started medical PrEP in private. If possible, individuals who are currently receiving PrEP and individuals who discontinued will be included.
Exclusion criteria
for key-populations : self-declared HIV-positive Eligibility criteria for community and health workers * Health workers and counselors: 1/ currently working in a HIV service targeting key populations (Samdach Ov Referral Hospital, Meanchey Referral Hospital, Social Health Clinic). 2/ currently working in a health service delivering PrEP (Chhouk Sar Clinic, Pochentong and Chaktomuk hospitals, RHAC) * Community workers: currently working in CBOs with EW, TG and/or MSM (Cambodian Women for Peace and Development (CWPD), Men's Health Cambodia (MHC), Men's Health Social Service (MHSS) Individual semi-directive interviews will be conducted: * NCHADS (operational unit of the Ministry of Health in charge of health sector policy development for HIV/AIDS) * National Aids Authority: in charge to lead, manage, coordinate and facilitate the comprehensive and multi-sectoral response to HIV and AIDS in Cambodia * Ministry of Health * Key influencer in the MSM and/or TG community * Key influencer in the EW community * Khana : an umbrella organization belonging to the HIV/AIDS international Alliance. * High class and hidden MSM * Discontinued PrEP user
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge about PrEP | 1 hour | qualitative assessement |
| Perception of PrEP | 1 hour | qualitative assessement |
| Acceptability of PrEP | 1 hour | qualitative assessement |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To better understand the characteristics, needs and expectations of community-based organisations (CBOs), in order to define the optimal conditions for community-based PrEP implementation | 1 hour | qualitative assessement |
| To identify tools that could be useful to increase PrEP awareness and acceptability, especially new technologies (apps, websites) | 1 hour | qualitative assessement |
Countries
Cambodia
Outcome results
None listed