Skip to content

Femur Transtrochanteric Fractures Treated With Dynamic Hip Screw and Calcium Sulfate Scaffold.

Unstable Proximal Femur Transtrochanteric Fractures Treated With Dynamic Hip Screw and ß -Tricalcium Phosphate/ Hemihydrated Calcium Sulfate Graft Scaffold

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05091359
Acronym
geneX
Enrollment
36
Registered
2021-10-25
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2019-05-10
Last updated
2021-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proximal Femur Fracture

Keywords

Dynamic Hip Screw, DHS HIP FRACTURE

Brief summary

This is a randomised prospective comparison study to evaluate the incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant alone compared to the dynamic hip screw adding calcium sulfate through the cervical canal before placing the sliding screw for improvement of the implant stability integration and bone healing.

Detailed description

Transtrochanteric fractures are a frequent entity, mainly in patients over 65 years old, with low bone density. Most of these fractures of the proximal femur are treated effectively with internal fixation with dynamic hip screw (DHS), nonetheless a conditional factor in the treatment success its in the fracture stability and in the osteoporosis severity. There is controversy in the treatment decision in patients with osteoporosis and an unstable fracture added the risk of peri-prosthetic infection or increased bleeding during surgery means that the decision to place a DHS versus a prosthesis is debated. This study represents the first comparison of closed reduction and internal fixation with DHS using calcium sulfate graft versus conventional DHS procedure.

Interventions

DEVICEStudy group with absorbable graft of tricalcium ß phosphate / calcium sulfate hemihydrate paste

Application of absorbable graft of tricalcium ß phosphate / calcium sulfate hemihydrate in paste for prevent loosening of Dynamic Hip Screw implant

Sponsors

Hospital Regional Tlalnepantla
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The procedure was elected by participant randomization.

Intervention model description

A two group comparison

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 65 and 80 years old * Patients classified as 31A1.3 and all 31A2 by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with stable hip fractures * Participants who do not accept the randomization process * patients who do not complete follow-up during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant in unstable transtrochanteric fractures12 weeks for each patientThe aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of cut - out failure of the dynamic hip screw implant alone compared to the dynamic hip screw adding calcium sulfate through the cervical canal before placing the sliding screw to improve implant integration and bone healing.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026