Skip to content

Evaluation of a Mind-body Based Application for the Treatment of Chronic/Persistent Pain.

Evaluation of a Mind-body Based Application for the Treatment of Chronic/Persistent Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05090683
Enrollment
198
Registered
2021-10-25
Start date
2021-10-15
Completion date
2022-07-15
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Migraine

Keywords

chronic pain, mind-body, mobile application

Brief summary

We are investigating the effects of a mind-body based mobile application on the experience of chronic pain. Participants meeting our criteria for chronic pain (confirmed via self-report) will complete an online baseline questionnaire. Eligible participants will be enrolled in the study and randomized into control (usual care, waitlisted) or intervention group (6-week mind-body based mobile application intervention). Randomization will be stratified by pain intensity and gender using computer-generated block randomization to create varying block sizes of 4 and 8. We will run the trial in multiple cohorts in series to obtain desired sample size. All participants will complete online questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention at 6 weeks that measure pain intensity, interference with daily living, pain perceptions, mental health outcomes, and medication use. Participants will also complete weekly questionnaires on weeks 2 to 6 to gauge frequency of application usage (intervention) or other pain treatments (control). Participants in the intervention group will be asked to repeat the follow-up questionnaire at 12-weeks.

Detailed description

See protocol for more details. (submitted at time of registration)

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMind-body mobile application

Self-directed; Study team will recommend daily use of mobile app for 6 weeks with a minimum of 4 times/week usage of mobile app for 6 weeks. Frequency will be monitored via weekly surveys.

Sponsors

University of the Fraser Valley
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participants in the control group will be aware that they have are serving as controls that have been wait-listed for access to the mobile application.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized into one of two groups: control (usual care, waitlisted) or intervention group (6-week mind-body mobile application use). Randomization will be stratified on pain intensity and gender using computer generated block randomization to create varying block sizes of 4 and 8.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 19 to 75 years with chronic pain. * chronic pain is defined as having non-malignant chronic or persistent pain for at least 6 months. * Participants must experience pain at least half the days in the last 6 months. * Pain can include bodily pain or head (migraine) pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals reporting a cognitive impairment that can interfere with completing questionnaires and using a mobile application. * Individuals reporting any of the following psychiatric illness: schizophrenia, dissociative or personality disorders, bipolar disorder. * Individuals reporting any of the following medical conditions: metastatic cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, polymyositis. * Individuals reporting substance use disorder (within the last 6 months). * Individuals that have previously used mind-body apps for the treatment of chronic pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)Baseline, 6 weeksPrimary outcome of Pain Severity: Single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). Primary outcome of Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain Interferencebaseline, 6 weeksMeasures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)baseline, 6 weeksMeasures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)baseline, 6 weeksMeasures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)baseline, 6 weeksMeasures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on Averagebaseline, 6 weeksSingle item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = had no pain to 5 = very severe pain Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.
PROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form12 weeksSingle item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = had no pain to 5 = very severe pain Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.
Medication Use6 weeksSelf-reported quantify of medication use (number of participant reporting regular usage). Note: this was a change from original plan for reporting. We have only reported frequencies of use (generally), and omitted details regarding dosage and number of pills as it was decided that this was beyond the scope of our team and trial. We also did not compare baseline to 6 weeks for the same reason.
PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a12 weeksMeasures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)12 weeksMeasures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)12 weeksMeasures self reported pain severity; Pain interference (over past 24 hours) Only measured in the intervention group (as wait-listed controls had accessed the mobile app and were released from the study). BPI Pain Severity: single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). BPI Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three cohorts recruited in series for three study starts: Cohort 1: October 15 2021 Cohort 2: January 6 2022 Cohort 3: April 7 2022 Randomized on October 15, 2022 (1); January 6, 2022 (2); and April 7, 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants completed a baseline questionnaire following initial interest in the study. If the participants did not meet the criteria for chronic/persistent pain based on their responses to this survey, they were automatically excluded. If participants did not complete baseline (pre-randomization) survey such that primary outcome and randomization data was incomplete, they were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mind-body Mobile Application
Participants are asked to engage with a user-guided mobile application (app) that employs mind-based techniques that include: expressive writing, meditation, cognitive behavioural therapy, and pain education. The app also includes access to podcasts that focus on pain counselling and pain education. Mind-body mobile application: Self-directed; Study team will recommend daily use of mobile app for 6 weeks with a minimum of 4 times/week usage of mobile app for 6 weeks. Frequency will be monitored via weekly surveys.
98
Control
Participants are asked to continue with usual care for pain treatments. They are asked not to start any new forms of treatment.
100
Total198

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up102
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlMind-body Mobile ApplicationTotal
Age, Continuous46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity on average over past 24 hours5.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Diagnoses
Fibromyalgia
21 Participants19 Participants40 Participants
Diagnoses
Migraine
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Diagnoses
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Diagnoses
No formal diagnosis
64 Participants66 Participants130 Participants
Diagnoses
Osteoarthritis
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Diagnoses
Other (not including above conditions)
7 Participants11 Participants18 Participants
Education
Bachelor degree or higher
55 Participants53 Participants108 Participants
Education
High school or less
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Education
Trade or diploma
33 Participants30 Participants63 Participants
Employment status
Did not respond
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Employment status
Employed (full or part time)
47 Participants50 Participants97 Participants
Employment status
Not able to work/on disability
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants
Employment status
Other (student, homemaker)
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Employment status
Retired
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Household income
> $100 000
26 Participants25 Participants51 Participants
Household income
< $34 999
27 Participants29 Participants56 Participants
Household income
$35 000 to $49 999
3 Participants12 Participants15 Participants
Household income
$50 000 to $74 999
20 Participants16 Participants36 Participants
Household income
$75 000 to $99 999
20 Participants13 Participants33 Participants
Household income
Chose not to answer.
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Pain duration14.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
13.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
90 Participants86 Participants176 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Jamaica
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Trinidad and Tobago
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Man
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-binary
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Prefer not to answer
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Woman
84 Participants78 Participants162 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 730 / 98
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 730 / 98
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 730 / 98

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

Primary outcome of Pain Severity: Single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). Primary outcome of Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Intervention period was 6 weeks, and questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 6-weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Pain interference at 6 weeks4.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Pain Interference at baseline5.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Average Pain Severity at baseline5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Average Pain Severity at 6-weeks4.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
ControlBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Pain interference at 6 weeks5.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
ControlBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Average Pain Severity at 6-weeks5.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
ControlBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Average Pain Severity at baseline5.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
ControlBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Pain Interference at baseline6.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)

Measures self reported pain severity; Pain interference (over past 24 hours) Only measured in the intervention group (as wait-listed controls had accessed the mobile app and were released from the study). BPI Pain Severity: single item scale within larger Brief Pain Inventory tool. Item scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome, lower scores indicate better outcome. Item range = (0,10). BPI Pain Interference: Item 9 on BPI measures interference with daily living. There are 7 items embedded within and each is scored on 11-point scales from 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes for interference with activities of daily living. Pain interference score is calculated as an average of the 7 items, with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Members of the intervention group who completed the additional 12 week follow up (intervention ended at 6 weeks).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)Pain interference (24 hours)4.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationBrief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-SF)BPI Pain intensity on average (24 hours)4.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)

Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Missing depression data for two participants in the control group. Missing anxiety data for one participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group.~Missing stress data for two participants in the intervention group and two participants in the control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Anxiety Score at baseline9.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Anxiety Score at 6-weeks7.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Depression Score at baseline14.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.52
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Stress Score at baseline16.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Depression Score at 6-weeks11.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Stress Score at 6-weeks13.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.14
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Stress Score at 6-weeks15.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Anxiety Score at baseline8.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.13
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Depression Score at 6-weeks14.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Anxiety Score at 6-weeks9.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Stress Score at baseline15.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
ControlDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale)Total Depression Score at baseline14.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Secondary

DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)

Measures self reported emotional states, three subscales: depression, anxiety, stress (each 7 items) Items scored on 4-point Likert scale: 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. Scores for each subscale are summed. Scores are then multiplied by 2 to calculate final score for each subscale. Scale ranges for each subscale is from 0 to 42 (after doubling of scores). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: See above 12 week data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)Depression6.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.99
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)Anxiety4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.72
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationDASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale - 21 Items)Stress7.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.71
Secondary

Medication Use

Self-reported quantify of medication use (number of participant reporting regular usage). Note: this was a change from original plan for reporting. We have only reported frequencies of use (generally), and omitted details regarding dosage and number of pills as it was decided that this was beyond the scope of our team and trial. We also did not compare baseline to 6 weeks for the same reason.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Medication categories are not mutually exclusive as many report usage of multiple classes of drugs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseNon-opioid analgesics48 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseAnti-convulsants13 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseOpioid analgesics11 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseAnti-depressants (SSRI, SSNI, TCA)20 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseAnti-spasmodics8 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseCannabanoids6 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseCNS depressants5 participants
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationMedication UseOther medicines related to pain9 participants
ControlMedication UseOther medicines related to pain5 participants
ControlMedication UseAnti-spasmodics9 participants
ControlMedication UseNon-opioid analgesics59 participants
ControlMedication UseCNS depressants8 participants
ControlMedication UseOpioid analgesics29 participants
ControlMedication UseCannabanoids10 participants
ControlMedication UseAnti-depressants (SSRI, SSNI, TCA)27 participants
ControlMedication UseAnti-convulsants31 participants
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Missing PCS data for one participant in the control group at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)Total PCS Scores at baseline22.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.22
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)Total PCS Scores at 6-weeks15.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.48
ControlPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)Total PCS Scores at baseline23.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
ControlPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)Total PCS Scores at 6-weeks20.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)

Measures thoughts and perceptions of pain, 13 items, scored using 5-pt Likert scale 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. Scores are the sum of all items. min score = 0; max score = 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Members of the intervention group who completed the additional 12 week follow up (intervention ended at 6 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPain Catastrophizing Questionnaire (PCS)16.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.83
Secondary

Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain Interference

Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Missing PROMIS data for one participant in the control group at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain InterferenceTotal PROMIS Pain Interference at 6-weeks16.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.36
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain InterferenceTotal PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline28.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
ControlPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain InterferenceTotal PROMIS Pain Interference at 6-weeks19.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.28
ControlPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 8a Pain InterferenceTotal PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline29.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.46
Secondary

Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on Average

Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = had no pain to 5 = very severe pain Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Missing PROMIS intensity data for one participant in the control group at 6 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on AveragePROMIS Pain Intensity on average at baseline2.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on AveragePROMIS Pain Intensity on average at 6-weeks2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
ControlPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on AveragePROMIS Pain Intensity on average at baseline3.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlPatient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form for Pain Intensity on AveragePROMIS Pain Intensity on average at 6-weeks3.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Secondary

PROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form

Single item from PROMIS that measures self reported pain intensity on average over 7 days. 5-point scale: 1 = had no pain to 5 = very severe pain Scale range = (1,5). Higher score indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Members of the intervention group who completed the additional 12 week follow up (intervention ended at 6 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPROMIS Pain Intensity Short Form2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Secondary

PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a

Measures self reported pain interference in daily activities (over 7 days). 8 items are added together for a sum score. Each item uses 5-pt Likert scale from 1 = not at all to 5 = very much (regarding pain interference). Scale range = 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Members of the intervention group who completed the additional 12 week follow up (intervention ended at 6 weeks).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationPROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a24.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.54
Secondary

Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better outcomes.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Members of the intervention group who completed the additional 12 week follow up (intervention ended at 6 weeks).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)Physical Component Score (SF12) at 12 weeks27.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.34
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)Mental Component Score (SF12) at 12 weeks50.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Secondary

Quality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)

Measures self-reported impact of health on daily life. The SF-12 is a brief version of the longer SF-36 and contains 12 items measured using a variety of Likert scales and dichotomous yes/no scales, with each item response assigned a numerical weight. PCS and MCS are component z-scores that are calculated using regression weights and constants for each (mental and physical) which have been derived from a U.S. population. Each item response choice category is coded as an indicator variable (scored 1 / 0). Indicator variables are weighted using regression coefficients from the US population for the MCS and PCS. The weighted scores across all items are then summed and are added to a constant (regression intercept) to obtain summary scores. Score ranges 0 to 100. Normalized score such that component scales have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. Higher scores indicate better

Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks

Population: Missing Physical Component Score data for three participants in the control group.~Missing Mental Component Score data for three participants in the control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Physical Component Score at baseline25.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Physical Component Score at 6-weeks29.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.37
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Mental Component Score at baseline47.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.47
Mind-body Mobile ApplicationQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Mental Component Score at 6-weeks49.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.39
ControlQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Mental Component Score at 6-weeks50.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.97
ControlQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Physical Component Score at baseline21.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
ControlQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Mental Component Score at baseline49.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
ControlQuality of Life Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS-12) and Mental (MCS-12) Component Summary Scores (Z-scores; Normalized Based on US General Population)QOL Physical Component Score at 6-weeks23.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026