Skip to content

Comparison of Dry Needling and Thera Gun Treatment on Trapezius Muscle Active Trigger Points.

Effects of Dry Needling Versus Fascial Gun on Pain Pressure Threshold, Cervical Ranges in Patients With Active Trigger Points of Trapezius Muscle.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05090332
Enrollment
32
Registered
2021-10-22
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-09-01
Last updated
2023-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

Trapezius Trigger Points, Range of motion, Pain threshold, Thera Gun, Dry Needling

Brief summary

Comparison of dry needling and Thera Gun on treatment of Active trigger points of trapezius Muscle, pain threshold and Range of motion of neck.

Detailed description

Chronic neck pain related to the myo-facial systems from local muscle fiber contractions referred to myo-facial trigger points (MTrPs).MTrPs are highly sensitive spots that lie in the skeletal muscle, and are diagnosed with mechanical pressure, they can also develop as referral pain in a specific pattern. Although MTrPs are found in all muscle groups, they are more prevalent in the upper quarter postural muscles, especially the upper trapezius muscle. Data will be collected from both gender patients having active trigger points in trapezius muscles. Then patients will be divided randomly into two groups. All patient will be given conventional treatment and then group A will be given treatment with Thera Gun and group B will be given dry needling treatment and then will compare effects of both. To date, a wide range of physical therapy interventions have been suggested to address MTrPs including manual therapies (massage, stretching, myofascial release), electrotherapy modalities (surface heat, ultrasound, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator and laser therapy) and invasive techniques such as dry needling (DN) but none of study is done on the effectiveness of facial gun in decreasing pain intensity and increasing range of motion and none of study compare the effect of Dry needling with facial gun. So, this study will determine the effect of facial gun on pain intensity and range of motion and compare that effect with dry needling.

Interventions

OTHERFacial Gun

Vibration massage applied for five Minutes directly on the trigger point

OTHERDry Needling

For dry needling the outer skin should be clean with alcohol and the taut band should be placed between thumb and index finger. Without damaging any nerve or artery the needle is passed though the muscle into the trigger point and breaking it to relief pain

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with cervical pain due to active trigger points of trapezius muscle * Numeric Pain Rating Scale\> 3

Exclusion criteria

* Any previous history of Trauma or surgery * Spondylitis * Carcinoma * Tuberculosis of spine * Diagnosed with cervical pain & stiffness due to disc herniation, radiculopathy or any other cervical malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue ScaleThree weeksVisual analogue scale (VAS) very simple and often used method to measure the intensity of pain or the attitude of the individual that may not be measured directly through any test. This scale has high degree of sensitivity i.e a discriminating capacity higher than the other scales. It is the continuous scale for estimation of the extent of pain consist of the straight line shows two extreme ends one is zero pain and the other is extreme pain and in between the words on far extreme 'slight, moderate and severe' too that is experience by the individual. When the patient fills the Visual analogue scale, the patient may mark the level of pain he/she experienced by highlighting the exact level along the line between these two ends. Assessment to be done at baseline, 3rd visit and 9th visit
Goniometer for cervical range of motionThree weeksGoniometer is the instrument that measures the available range of the motion of joint. The goniometer is simple 360 degree with fulcrum and two arms. There are many types of goniometer one of them is universal standard goniometer that is consist of one moveable arm and the other is static (immobile) arm. That is either made of plastic or metal tool. It may help to measure the ranges of motions and their lengths. Inter-rater reliability (ICC2,2 = 0.79-0.92). Assessment to be done at baseline, 3rd visit and 9th visit
AlgometerThree weeksThe pressure algometer (PA) is a measuring instrument that may help in the calculation of pain threshold for the involved trigger point. The force recorded is the amount of the pressure that caused pain in the subject called the pressure pain threshold. The inter-examiner reliability if the PA is good or satisfactory with the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC 0.78-0.93) . Assessment will be done at baseline, 3rd and 9th visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck Disability IndexThree weeksNeck disability index: it is the assessment tool used for both research and clinical purposes for the measurement of chronic neck pain. The patient is asked to fill the questionnaire by the researcher or clinician in order to know the level of pain while managing its affects in daily life. Basically, the questionnaire is designed to assess the Activities of Daily livings and Instrumental Activities of daily Livings of patient complaining about chronic neck pain. There are 10 questions includes, pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each question is marked on a 0 to 5 rating scale where 0 is considered as 'no pain' and 5 means 'maximum pain'. Assessment to be done at baseline, 3rd and 9th visit.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026