Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Adolescence
Conditions
Keywords
Adolescent, Primary Care, PTSD, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Randomized Feasibility Trial, TF-CBT
Brief summary
There are three research questions: (1) whether the Primary Care Intervention for PTSD (PCIP) improves health outcomes; (2) whether and how the PCIP can be sustainably delivered via telehealth; and (3) how PCIP compares to treatment as usual (TAU) participants. The mixed methods randomized feasibility trial of the protocol will be measured by the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) (n=44 patients and their care givers). We will collect data on patient, caregiver, and clinic staff participation, retention, and satisfaction (Reach and Adoption), change in hypothesized treatment mechanisms and symptoms (Effectiveness), and facilitators and barriers to intervention delivery and fidelity (Implementation). We will, 1. Assess the reach and adoption of the protocol by analyzing quantitative data on patient and clinic staff participation, retention, and satisfaction; 2. Explore the effectiveness of the protocol through medical record review, quantitative assessments at baseline and post-treatment, and semi-structured qualitative interviews at baseline and post-treatment to: 3. Evaluate the implementation of the screening and intervention protocol with post-intervention semi-structured qualitative interviews to assess facilitators and barriers to intervention delivery, quantitative fidelity scales, observation of screening, and review of intervention audio recordings to assess fidelity to the protocol and intervention process.
Interventions
This program is adapted from the "B.R.E.A.T.H.E. - Brief Relaxation, Education and Trauma Healing: A Brief Intervention for Persons with PTSD and Co- Occurring Serious Mental Health Conditions. Treatment Program Manual and Patient Handouts (Version 3) by Kim T. Mueser, Rachael Fite, Stanley D. Rosenberg, and Jennifer D. Gottlieb.
Receive standard care treatment and are provided information on free or low cost mental health care referrals in the Los Angeles Area.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This study will utilize a hybrid effectiveness-implementation approach to conduct a randomized pilot feasibility trial of the PCIP screening and intervention protocol in adolescent primary care with two treatment arms: 1. PCIP delivered through telehealth (computer or smartphone delivered videocall) 2. Treatment as usual (TAU)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient referred to the SHARK Program 2. Patients must be at least 12 years old 3. Screened for probable PTSD on UCLA RI, or at provider discretion of clinical relevancy. 4. If patient is under 18 years old, the patient's legal guardian is able and willing to provide informed consent for the patient to participate in the study; 5. Patient is able to complete study activities in English.
Exclusion criteria
1. Suicidal ideation with a plan within the last two weeks or a suicide attempt within the past 30 days; 2. Inability to provide informed consent or assent, and/or complete procedures in English.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in PTSD Knowledge | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in levels of PTSD Knowledge measured by the PTSD Knowledge Test (0-14, higher scores indicating more PTSD knowledge) |
| Change in Trauma-Related Cognitions | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in post-traumatic cognitions measured by the Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (1-7, Higher scores indicating more post traumatic cognitions) |
| Change in Self-Reported Arousal | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in PTSD related arousal levels measured by the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31; 0-100 total, Higher scores indicating higher arousal) |
| Change in Stress Management Skill Use | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in PTSD related arousal levels measured Measure of Adolescent Coping Strategies (MACS; Total 0-102, higher scores indicate higher use of specified coping), and use of the breathing retraining techniques as measured by self-reports during in-session review. |
| Intervention Implementation and Acceptability | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Qualitative interviews will include questions regarding acceptability of treatment including treatment via telehealth. Additionally, data will be collected regarding participant completion of therapy, no show rates, barriers to treatment, and attendance. Additionally, study therapists will complete qualitative and quantitative measures regarding intervention delivery feasibility and study protocols. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in PTSD Symptoms | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in PTSD related symptoms measured by the UCLA Child/Adolescent PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 Brief Screen (total 0-44; Higher scores indicate higher likelihood of PTSD and symptom-related distress and impairment) |
| Change in Trauma Symptoms | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in trauma related symptoms measured by The Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5-SR) Self Report (total 0-80, Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity). |
| Change in Adverse Childhood Experiences | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in Adverse Childhood Experiences measured by the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life Events Screener (PEARLS; 0-19, higher scores indicate higher risk of traumatic stress. |
| Change in Depression Symptoms | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in depression symptoms measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-DC) Self Report (total 0-60, Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity). |
| Change in Anxiety Symptoms | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in anxiety symptoms measured by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) Self Report (total 0-141, Higher scores indicating higher symptom severity). |
| Change in Functional Impairment | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in functional impairment measured by The Columbia Impairment Scale (C.I.S.; 0-52, Higher scores indicate greater impairment). |
| Change in pro-inflammatory cytokine biomarkers | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-1ß will be analyzed from Dried Blood Spots (DBS) |
| Change in pro-inflammatory transcription factor activation | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in pro-inflammatory transcription factor activation including NF-κB/Rel will be analyzed from Dried Blood Spots (DBS) |
| Change in Substance Use | Day 0 baseline, 10 months | Changes in substance use and misuse measured by CRAFFT Adolescent Substance Use Screen (0-9, Higher scores indicate higher risk for substance misuse) |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of California, Los Angeles