Skip to content

Muscle Energy Technique on Sacroiliac Dysfunction

Effect of Muscle Energy Technique on Postpartum Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05088837
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-10-22
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
2020-07-30
Last updated
2021-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sacroiliac Disorder

Keywords

Muscle energy technique, sacroiliac dysfunction, ice and heat pack

Brief summary

Sacroiliac pain is a huge problem in women during pregnancy and postpartum period. Muscle energy technique has potential effect in decreasing the pain and disability

Detailed description

A sample of forty women diagnosed with postpartum sacroiliac dysfunction, their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years and their BMI was ranged from 25-30 kg / m2 participated in this study, they were selected and divided randomly into 2 equal groups (A&B). Group (A) (Control group): consisted of 20 patients, they received muscle energy technique for 12 sessions, 3 sessions / week. Group (B) (Study group): consisted of 20 patients, they received alternative heat and ice for another 20 minutes /session (10 minutes for each). All patients in both group were evaluated at the beginning of the study and after 12 sessions through measuring pain intensity using visual analog scale and disability using oswestry disability index (ODI)

Interventions

OTHERmuscle energy technique

MET was performed in the form of post-isometric relaxation technique for iliopsoas, hamstrings, and erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles. the limb was taken very slightly beyond the restriction barrier and was held there for 10-30 seconds, it was done 3 times per session for 12 sessions.

OTHERice and heat packs

Applying 20 minutes: 10 minutes hot,10 minutes cold on sacroiliac area, 3 times per week for 12 sessions

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An independent individual randomly appointed to all participants to either group (A) (n=20) or group (B) (n=20) by numbers that were picked from the closed envelopes.

Intervention model description

Group (A) (Control group): consisted of 20 patients, they received muscle energy technique for 12 sessions, 3 sessions / week. Group (B) (Study group): consisted of 20 patients, they received alternative heat and ice for another 20 minutes /session (10 minutes for each).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years . * Their BMI was ranged from 25-30 kg / m2

Exclusion criteria

* hip fracture, * SIJ infection. * scoliosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
visual analog scale Visual anlage scale4 weeksIt was used for determining pain intensity before and after the treatment course for each patients in both groups (A&B). Visual analogue scale is a-10 centimeters line, at one end was written (no pain = zero) and at the other end was written (worst pain the patient ever felt = 10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry disability index4 weeksThe self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics concerning intensity of pain, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, were used to measure the level of disability before and after treatment

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026