Skip to content

A Study to Examine the Effects of the Leptin Receptor (LEPR) Agonist Antibody REGN4461 in Adult Patients With Familial Partial Lipodystrophy (FPLD)

A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of the LEPR Agonist Antibody REGN4461 for the Treatment of Metabolic Abnormalities in Patients With Familial Partial Lipodystrophy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05088460
Acronym
LEAP
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-10-22
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
2024-04-18
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Familial Partial Lipodystrophy, Metabolic Abnormalities

Brief summary

Two cohorts are being studied based on leptin levels. Cohort A is composed of patients with baseline leptin \<8.0 ng/mL and Cohort B is composed of patients with baseline leptin 8.0 to ≤20.0 ng/mL The primary objectives will be evaluated for patients in Cohort A only: * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on fasting triglycerides (TG) in patients with elevated baseline fasting TG * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on hyperglycemia in patients with elevated baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) The following secondary objectives of the study will be evaluated for Cohort B and for the combined set of Cohorts A plus B: * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on fasting TG levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on glycemic control in patients with hyperglycemia The following secondary objectives of the study will be evaluated for Cohorts A and B separately, and for the combined set of Cohorts A plus B: * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on liver fat in patients with hepatic steatosis * To evaluate the effect of REGN4461 on hunger * To evaluate safety and tolerability of REGN4461 * To characterize the concentration profile of REGN4461 over time * To assess immunogenicity to REGN4461

Interventions

Intravenous (IV) infusion loading dose followed by subcutaneous (SC) injection weekly (QW).

DRUGMatching Placebo

Intravenous (IV) infusion loading dose followed by subcutaneous (SC) injection weekly (QW).

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical diagnosis of familial partial lipodystrophy as defined in the protocol * Fasting leptin level ≤20.0 ng/ml, as determined during the screening period * Presence of significant metabolic abnormalities related to glucose and triglycerides (TGs) as defined in the protocol * Stable body weight within the 3 months prior to screening (no gain or loss of \>5% current weight) * Stable diet during the past 3 months defined as no major change in macronutrient composition (eg, starting or stopping diets such as Atkins, Paleo, Vegetarianism, Veganism) * No clinically meaningful change in medication regimen in the 3 months prior to screening as defined in the protocol Key

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with metreleptin within 3 months of the screening visit * Patients with a diagnosis of generalized lipodystrophy * Patients with a diagnosis of acquired lipodystrophy * Pregnant or breastfeeding women NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum Triglyceride (TG) (Cohort A)Baseline to week 12Percentage change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants with elevated baseline fasting TG (\> 200 mg/dL) and with baseline leptin \< 8.0 ng/mL (Cohort A).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Cohort A)Baseline to week 12Change in HbA1c was reported for participants with elevated baseline HbA1c (\> 7.0%) and with baseline leptin \< 8.0 ng/mL (Cohort A).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)Baseline to week 12Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants with elevated baseline fasting TG (\>200 mg/dL) in Cohort B and Cohorts A + B.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)Baseline to week 12Change in HbA1c was reported for participants with elevated baseline HbA1c (\>7.0%) in Cohort B and Cohorts A + B.
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Change from baseline in HbA1c was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Change from baseline in HbA1c was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Change from baseline in fasting glucose was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Change from baseline in fasting glucose was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Percent change from baseline in MRI-PDFF was reported for participants with baseline MRI-PDFF ≥8.5% in Study Arm 1.
Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Baseline, Week 12, Week 24Percent change from baseline in MRI-PDFF was reported for participants with baseline liver fat MRI-PDFF ≥8.5% in Study Arm 2.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreBaseline, Week 12, Week 24The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The highest hunger score asked participants to rate their highest hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores representing the higher perceived hunger. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in perceived hunger.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreBaseline, Week 12, Week 24The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The lowest hunger score asked participants to rate their lowest hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived hunger. A negative change from baseline score indicated a reduction in perceived lowest hunger.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreBaseline, Week 12, Week 24The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among participants with lipodystrophy. The felt hungry score asked how much time participants felt hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more time feeling hungry. A negative change from baseline score indicated a reduction in time spent feeling hungry.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreBaseline, Week 12, Week 24The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The fullness score asked participants to rate how often they felt full after eating that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher feeling of fullness. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduced feeling of fullness.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to Day 169
Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 28, 32 and 36. Weeks 0 and 12 collected pre- and post-dose. All other time points were only pre-dose.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) ResponseUp to Day 281

Countries

France, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 66 participants were screened, of whom 20 were randomized and received study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461
Participants randomized to Arm 1 received placebo for 12 weeks during the DBTP followed by crossover to REGN4461 treatment for 12 weeks during the SBTP.
6
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461
Participants randomized to Arm 2 received REGN4461 treatment for 12 weeks during the DBTP followed by an additional 12 weeks of REGN4461 treatment during the SBTP.
6
Arm 1 Cohort B: Placebo to REGN4461
Participants randomized to Arm 1 received placebo for 12 weeks during the DBTP followed by crossover to REGN4461 treatment for 12 weeks during the SBTP.
4
Arm 2 Cohort B: REGN4461 to REGN4461
Participants randomized to Arm 2 received REGN4461 treatment for 12 weeks during the DBTP followed by an additional 12 weeks of REGN4461 treatment during the SBTP.
4
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461TotalArm 2 Cohort B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Arm 1 Cohort B: Placebo to REGN4461Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461
Age, Continuous40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.79
43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.82
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants20 Participants4 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fasting Triglycerides Serum Concentration1100.9 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)698.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)336.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)675.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)737.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)8.8 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62
8.2 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68
8.6 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.06
6.9 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
8.2 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants18 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants18 Participants4 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 40 / 40 / 50 / 60 / 30 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 66 / 64 / 44 / 43 / 55 / 63 / 34 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 61 / 61 / 40 / 41 / 51 / 60 / 30 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Cohort A)

Change in HbA1c was reported for participants with elevated baseline HbA1c (\> 7.0%) and with baseline leptin \< 8.0 ng/mL (Cohort A).

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Cohort A)-0.05 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.451
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (Cohort A)-1.08 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.108
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum Triglyceride (TG) (Cohort A)

Percentage change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants with elevated baseline fasting TG (\> 200 mg/dL) and with baseline leptin \< 8.0 ng/mL (Cohort A).

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum Triglyceride (TG) (Cohort A)-11.30 percent changeStandard Deviation 46.306
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum Triglyceride (TG) (Cohort A)-38.97 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.998
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)

Change in HbA1c was reported for participants with elevated baseline HbA1c (\>7.0%) in Cohort B and Cohorts A + B.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)-0.20 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.283
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)-0.90 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.964
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)-0.10 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.379
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c (Cohorts B and A + B)-1.01 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.988
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)

Change from baseline in fasting glucose was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 247.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.65
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 124.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 29.55
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 24-15.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 6.36
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 120.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 60.37
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 122.7 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 42.54
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 1)Week 240.7 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 26.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)

Change from baseline in fasting glucose was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 12-5.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36.55
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 241.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 26.35
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 12-19.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.87
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 24-12.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 58.59
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 12-10.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.17
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Glucose (Study Arm 2)Week 24-5.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)

Change from baseline in HbA1c was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 24-0.78 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.694
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 12-0.10 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.406
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 240.13 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.802
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 120.13 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.427
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 120.00 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.406
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 1)Week 24-0.44 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.826
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)

Change from baseline in HbA1c was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 12-0.92 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.068
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 24-0.98 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.357
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 12-0.78 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.826
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 24-0.50 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.068
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 12-0.86 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.931
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in HbA1c (Study Arm 2)Week 24-0.77 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.188
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry Score

The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among participants with lipodystrophy. The felt hungry score asked how much time participants felt hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more time feeling hungry. A negative change from baseline score indicated a reduction in time spent feeling hungry.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 120.248 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8642
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 240.016 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3932
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 240.120 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4374
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 12-0.550 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5334
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 12-0.168 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 24-0.183 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0603
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 120.008 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9139
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 24-0.138 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6595
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 120.082 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6993
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 24-0.059 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3163
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 240.006 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5265
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Felt Hungry ScoreWeek 12-0.327 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7206
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness Score

The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The fullness score asked participants to rate how often they felt full after eating that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher feeling of fullness. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduced feeling of fullness.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 120.063 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1988
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 24-0.182 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6474
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 240.012 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6474
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 12-0.267 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5381
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 24-1.193 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.663
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 12-1.180 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3764
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 24-0.178 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8032
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 12-0.535 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5736
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 24-0.561 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7994
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 12-0.434 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1216
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 12-0.374 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5383
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Fullness ScoreWeek 24-0.072 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6793
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger Score

The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The highest hunger score asked participants to rate their highest hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores representing the higher perceived hunger. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in perceived hunger.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.330 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3684
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.060 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9009
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.018 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6228
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.538 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4679
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2483
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.383 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.155
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.285 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.618
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.415 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7539
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.132 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6929
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.350 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2919
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.489 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5614
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Highest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.137 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5975
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger Score

The daily lipodystrophy hunger questionnaire was developed to assess hunger related behaviors among patients with lipodystrophy. The lowest hunger score asked participants to rate their lowest hunger that day on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher perceived hunger. A negative change from baseline score indicated a reduction in perceived lowest hunger.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.128 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0622
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 120.185 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8013
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 240.046 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6776
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.475 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.463
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.338 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4287
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.103 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.223
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 240.308 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9603
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.173 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3625
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.024 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7006
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 24-0.119 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1288
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 12-0.354 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4328
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 on the Daily Lipodystrophy Hunger Questionnaire - Lowest Hunger ScoreWeek 240.162 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.771
Secondary

Concentrations of REGN4461 in Serum

Time frame: Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 28, 32 and 36. Weeks 0 and 12 collected pre- and post-dose. All other time points were only pre-dose.

Population: The PK analysis set was defined as all randomized participants who received any study drug and have at least 1 non-missing measurement of REGN4461 concentration following the first dose of study drug. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 0 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 0 (post-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 1 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 2 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 3 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 4 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 5 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 6 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 9 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 12 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 12 (post-dose)252 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 50.7
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 13 (pre-dose)62.4 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 17.5
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 14 (pre-dose)56.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 17.6
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 15 (pre-dose)64.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 29.6
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 16 (pre-dose)68.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.3
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 17 (pre-dose)73.4 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 30.8
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 18 (pre-dose)75.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 27.1
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 21 (pre-dose)89.3 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 40
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 28 (pre-dose)10.9 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 12
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 32 (pre-dose)0.0663 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0705
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 36 (pre-dose)0.0110 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.033
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 12 (post-dose)87.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 49.7
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 0 (pre-dose)0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 28 (pre-dose)16.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 23.4
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 0 (post-dose)232 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 83.8
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 13 (pre-dose)97.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 68.6
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 1 (pre-dose)64.3 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.9
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 18 (pre-dose)95.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 79.3
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 2 (pre-dose)52.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 13.3
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 14 (pre-dose)92.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 68
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 3 (pre-dose)60.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 19
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 36 (pre-dose)0.0373 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.0788
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 4 (pre-dose)58.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 23.8
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 15 (pre-dose)90.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 59.1
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 5 (pre-dose)62.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 36.1
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 21 (pre-dose)72.9 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 51.4
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 6 (pre-dose)68.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 38.8
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 16 (pre-dose)103 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 76.4
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 9 (pre-dose)79.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 49.2
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 32 (pre-dose)0.189 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.281
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 12 (pre-dose)87.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 57.8
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Concentrations of REGN4461 in SerumWeek 17 (pre-dose)92.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 73.3
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Time frame: Up to Day 169

Population: The DB SAF included all participants who received any double-blind study drug in DBTP. The single-blind safety analysis set (SB SAF) included all randomized participants who received any single-blind study drug in the single-blind treatment period (SBTP).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4 Participants
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5 Participants
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4 Participants
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4 Participants
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)8 Participants
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)9 Participants
SBTP Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3 Participants
SBTP Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5 Participants
SBTP Arm 1 Cohort B: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3 Participants
SBTP Arm 2 Cohort B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4 Participants
SBTP Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)6 Participants
SBTP Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response

Time frame: Up to Day 281

Population: The ADA analysis set included all treated participants who received any amount of study drug and had at least one non-missing anti-drug antibody result following the first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response0 Participants
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response0 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)

Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants with elevated baseline fasting TG (\>200 mg/dL) in Cohort B and Cohorts A + B.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)36.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.863
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)-35.59 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.754
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)10.07 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.689
Arm 2 Combined Cohort A + B: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Serum TG (Cohorts B and A + B)-37.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.752
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)

Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants in Study Arm 1.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 12-11.30 percent changeStandard Deviation 46.306
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 24-29.79 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.109
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 1236.78 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.863
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 24-8.96 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.673
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 1210.07 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.689
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 1)Week 24-23.84 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.923
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)

Percent change in fasting serum TG was reported for participants in Study Arm 2.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 12-38.97 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.998
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 24-30.77 percent changeStandard Deviation 48.883
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 12-35.59 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.754
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 24-5.30 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.158
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 12-37.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.752
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Fasting Serum TG (Study Arm 2)Week 24-18.04 percent changeStandard Deviation 48.282
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)

Percent change from baseline in MRI-PDFF was reported for participants with baseline MRI-PDFF ≥8.5% in Study Arm 1.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure with baseline MRI-PDFF ≥8.5%, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 12-11.44 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.576
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 24-47.21 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.176
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 12-0.74 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.919
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 2444.81 percent change
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 12-7.16 percent changeStandard Deviation 15.214
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) (Study Arm 1)Week 24-16.54 percent changeStandard Deviation 55.394
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)

Percent change from baseline in MRI-PDFF was reported for participants with baseline liver fat MRI-PDFF ≥8.5% in Study Arm 2.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: The FAS included all randomized participants who received any study drug in the DBTP and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed is the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure with baseline MRI-PDFF ≥8.5%, and Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 12-17.05 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.788
Arm 1 Cohort A: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 24-24.33 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.151
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 12-18.80 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.3
Arm 2 Cohort A: REGN4461 to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 24-19.53 percent changeStandard Deviation 19.324
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 24-22.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 22.353
Arm 1 Combined Cohort A + B: Placebo to REGN4461Percent Change From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 in Liver Fat MRI-PDFF (Study Arm 2)Week 12-17.92 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.351

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026