Skip to content

Multicenter Clinical Trial Comparing Treatment with Allogeneic Mesenchymal Cells Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Cells and Versus Active Control with Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Trial Comparing Treatment with Allogeneic Mesenchymal Cells Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Cells and Versus Active Control with Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05086939
Acronym
ARTROCELL
Enrollment
124
Registered
2021-10-21
Start date
2021-05-26
Completion date
2026-05-31
Last updated
2024-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing treatment with allogeneic mesenchymal cells versus autologous mesenchymal cells and versus active control with hyaluronic acid in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Interventions

Intra-articular injection 40 million/4 ml.

DRUGAllogenic MSCs

Intra-articular injection 40 million/4 ml.

DRUGHyaluronic Acid

Intra-articular injection 60mg / 3 ml .

Sponsors

Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca
CollaboratorOTHER
Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReN
CollaboratorNETWORK
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
CollaboratorOTHER
Fundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized, Open-label, Clinical Trial comparing 3 active treatments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Gonarthrosis grade 2, 3 or 4 of Kellgren and Lawrence (Kellgren & Lawrence, 1957) assessed by two observers. 2. Chronic painful knee of mechanical characteristics. 3. Absence of local or systemic septic process. 4. Hemat imetric and biochemical analysis without significant alterations that contraindicate the treatment. 5. Written informed consent of the patient. 6. The patient is able to understand the nature of the study. 7. Body Mass Index 20-35 Kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient \< 18 years old, or legally dependent. 2. Patient \> 75 years old. 3. Congenital or developmental diseases that translate malformation and / or significant deformations of the knee (varus\>10º; valgus\>20º) and condition difficulties of application and evaluation of the results. 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 5. Neoplastic disease. 6. Intra-articular infiltration of any drug in the 3 months prior to study inclusion. 7. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to study enrollment. 8. Allergy to gentamicin (antibiotic used in the cell culture process ). 9. Other diseases or circumstances that compromise participation in the study according to medical criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological response using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.12 monthsEvaluation of radiological response using T2 mapping nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (screening visit global mean of T2 values versus 12 months visit global mean of T2 values).
Range of motion.12 monthsEvaluation of clinical-functional response using Joint range-of-motion evaluation (Flexion score 0º-140º / Extension score -140º-0º / Hyperextension: positive degrees from 0).
Pain self-assessment.12 monthsEvaluation of pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Pain self-assessment score range from 0 -no pain- to 10 -maximum-).
Knee Osteoarthritis.12 monthsEvaluation of Knee Osteoarthritis using Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) \[measures five items for pain (score range from 0 -no pain- to 20 -maximum-), two for stiffness (score range from 0-no stiffness- to 8 -maximum-), and 17 for functional limitation (score range from 0 -no limitation- to 68 -maximum-)\]
Functional response.12 monthsEvaluation of functional response using Lequesne Algofunctional Index (score range from 0 to 24). It includes measures of pain (5 questions), walking distance (1 question) and activities of daily living (4 questions) with separate versions for the hip and knee. The scores for each question are summed to obtain a combined score of disease severity. Scores 1 to 4 are classified as mild osteoarthrosis; 5 to 7, moderate; 8 to 10, severe; 11 to 13, very severe; and 14 and above, extremely severe.
X-ray changes of osteoarthritis.12 monthsRadiological response using Kellgren and Lawrence classification system (grade from 0 to 4): * grade 0 (none): definite absence of x-ray changes of osteoarthritis. * grade 1 (doubtful): doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping. * grade 2 (minimal): definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing. * grade 3 (moderate): moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends. * grade 4 (severe): large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space, severe sclerosis and definite deformity of bone ends.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility assessment of a multicentre strategy production of both cell types with several Cell Production Units24 monthsRate of products not conforming to the validation criteria in each arm of experimental treatment.
Evaluation of presence of adverse events related with investigational medical product (IMP).24 monthsRate of adverse events and other pharmacovigilance parameters in the three treatment arms.
Evaluation of products obtained by genomic study and potency studies of the final products of all cell types (exploratory objective)30 daysStudies of the cell product. In this exploratory objective, genomic studies will be carried out using RNA-seq and open array on the advanced therapy drugs manufactured in the study (both autologous and allogeneic), and a correlation will be made with clinical and biological parameters and with the response.
Evaluate induced changes in circulating cells of the immune system after cell treatment (exploratory objetive)30 daysEvaluation of cell populations (NK cells, B cells, regulatory T cells, myeloid suppressor cells, T cell populations) by flow cytometry, prior to administration of cell therapy, at 7 days and 30 days. Evaluation of activation and inhibition markers in T lymphocytes (CD69, HLADR, CD137, PD1, LAG3 and TIM3) prior to administration of cell therapy, at 7 days and 30 days Population of inflammatory cytokines circulating in peripheral blood (Plex deB iorad -reference M50DKFADY), prior to administration of treatment, at 7 days and 30 days
Perceived general well-being.6, 12 and 24 monthsEvaluation of quality of life using Short Form-12 Health Survey questionnaire (SF12) \[score range from 0 (the worst health status for that dimension) to 100 (the best health status)\]

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026