Skip to content

EMBr Wave for the Reduction of Hot Flashes in Women With a History of Breast Cancer

Cool Down With EMBr: Enhancing Menopausal Hot Flash Symptom Reduction After Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05086705
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-10-21
Start date
2020-10-07
Completion date
2023-08-24
Last updated
2025-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Carcinoma, Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Breast Lobular Carcinoma In Situ, Hot Flashes

Brief summary

This trial studies how well EMBr Wave technology works in reducing hot flashes in women with a history of breast cancer. Hot flashes are a common symptom experienced by menopausal women. The standard treatment for hot flashes is hormone replacement therapy, however hormone replacement therapy cannot be used in women with a history of, or active, breast cancer. EMBr Wave is a personal heating and cooling device worn on the wrist. EMBr Wave may help reduce hot flash severity in women with a history of breast cancer.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the feasibility of using EMBr Wave technology in women with a history of breast cancer who are experiencing bothersome hot flashes. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of EMBr Wave in reducing hot flash severity and frequency in women with a history of breast cancer. II. To identify in what ways EMBr Wave has the greatest potential efficacy, such as reduction in vasomotor symptoms (VMS) severity, frequency, duration, sense of control, or self-esteem. III. To estimate effect sizes to inform power calculations for a future phase III trial. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients utilize the EMBr Wave device for 4 weeks, then crossover to arm B for 4 weeks. ARM B: Patients receive no treatment for 4 weeks, then crossover to arm A for 4 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICEEMBr Wave

Use EMBr Wave

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

Embr Labs, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women with history of breast cancer, ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or lobular breast carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (currently without evidence of malignant disease) * Bothersome hot flashes (defined by their occurrence of \>= 28 times per week and of sufficient severity to prompt the patient to seek therapeutic intervention) * Presence of hot flashes for \> 30 days prior to study entry * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance * Willingness to wear EMBr Wave device during the study period * Willingness to use the EMBr Wave mobile application * Have a working smartphone that can download the EMBr Wave mobile application (iPhone 6 or more recent generation, Android 8.0 or more recent generation) * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) = 0, 1 * Ability to provide informed written consent * Life expectancy \>= 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Antineoplastic chemotherapy (anti-HER2 agents allowed) (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Androgens (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Systemic estrogens. Local vaginal estrogen preparations are allowed, but need to have been initiated for vulvo-vaginal atrophy at least 28 days prior, and must not be expected to stop or change the dose or frequency of the medication during the study period (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Progestogens (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Tamoxifen, raloxifene and aromatase inhibitors are allowed, but patient must have been on a constant dose for at least 28 days and must not be expected to stop the medication during the study period (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Selective serotonin reuptate inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs), when being used for hot flash management or other indications such as depression, is allowed, assuming the dose will remain unchanged for the study duration (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Gabapentin/pregabalin, when being used for hot flash management (use for other indications, such as pain, is allowed, assuming the dose will remain unchanged for the study duration) (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Clonidine (current \[=\< 4 weeks prior\] or planned therapy) * Prior use of EMBr Wave * Nickel allergy * Pregnant or nursing women since the safety of device has not been established in this population

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device UsageUp to 8 weeksFeasibility will be evaluated primarily with respect to device usage. The proportion of patients who wear the device for at least 8 hours between 8:00 am and 8:00 pm for at least 22 days will be estimated using the entire sample and a 95% Jeffreys interval for binomial proportions will be computed.
Patient SatisfactionAt 8 weeksFeasibility will be evaluated secondarily with respect to patient satisfaction. The mean patient satisfaction scores for each Likert-type question and proportion of patients reporting satisfaction scores at or above 7 will be estimated in the entire sample and compared between sequence groups at the 5% significance level (two-sided).Rated on a 10-point Likert scale with 10 being most satisfied or most effective.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)At week 4 and at week 8Reported via patient reported outcomes, primarily Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS), a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no interference (best outcome) and 10 being completely interfere (worst outcome). Survey administered on paper or via RedCap survey distribution at week 4 and week 8.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)
Patients utilize the EMBr Wave device for 4 weeks, then receive no treatment for 4 weeks. EMBr Wave: Use EMBr Wave Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
25
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)
Patients receive no treatment for 4 weeks, then utilize the EMBr Wave device for 4 weeks. EMBr Wave: Use EMBr Wave Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (EMBr Wave First)Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants25 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Device Usage

Feasibility will be evaluated primarily with respect to device usage. The proportion of patients who wear the device for at least 8 hours between 8:00 am and 8:00 pm for at least 22 days will be estimated using the entire sample and a 95% Jeffreys interval for binomial proportions will be computed.

Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

Population: Data was not collected or analyzed

Primary

Patient Satisfaction

Feasibility will be evaluated secondarily with respect to patient satisfaction. The mean patient satisfaction scores for each Likert-type question and proportion of patients reporting satisfaction scores at or above 7 will be estimated in the entire sample and compared between sequence groups at the 5% significance level (two-sided).Rated on a 10-point Likert scale with 10 being most satisfied or most effective.

Time frame: At 8 weeks

Population: Patient satisfaction data was only obtained for the 29 out of 50 participants who gave responses for the exit survey (12 from Arm A and 17 from Arm B). Satisfaction scores pertain to satisfaction with EMBr wave device usage, so no data is reported for the No Treatment Group

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionIntensity4.97 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionDuration5.48 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionWork4.76 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionSocial4.72 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionLeisure4.86 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionSleep4.41 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionMood4.97 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionConcentrate4.90 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionRelation4.41 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionSexuality3.24 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionEnjoy5.10 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionQuality5.38 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionWorth5.79 score on a scale
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Patient SatisfactionSatisfy5.52 score on a scale
Secondary

Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)

Reported via patient reported outcomes, primarily Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS), a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no interference (best outcome) and 10 being completely interfere (worst outcome). Survey administered on paper or via RedCap survey distribution at week 4 and week 8.

Time frame: At week 4 and at week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Leisure Activities3.4362 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3063
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Concentration3.7391 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3464
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Social Activities3.0626 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3356
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Relations with others2.5774 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3331
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Sleep4.8231 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3948
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Sexuality2.9739 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4058
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Enjoyment of Life3.2259 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3234
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Work3.6368 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3386
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Quality of Life3.4489 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3248
Arm A (EMBr Wave First)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Mood3.7743 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3367
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Quality of Life3.5543 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3386
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Work3.6743 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3261
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Social Activities3.1652 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.359
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Leisure Activities3.5256 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3566
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Sleep5.4950 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3403
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Mood4.0794 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3254
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Concentration4.1341 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3634
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Relations with others2.6717 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Enjoyment of Life3.3231 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3651
Arm B (EMBr Wave Second)Effect of EMBr Wave Using Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)Sexuality3.1144 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4228

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026