Skip to content

Growth Trial: Study of the Renata Minima Stent

GROWTH: A Multicenter Pivotal Study of Neonatal, Infant, and Young Child Vascular Stenoses Studying the Renata Minima Stent

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05086016
Enrollment
42
Registered
2021-10-20
Start date
2021-01-14
Completion date
2028-03-30
Last updated
2025-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coarctation of the Aorta, Pulmonary Artery Stenosis

Brief summary

The objective of the clinical investigation is to access clinical safety and effectiveness of the Minima Stent in neonates, infants, and young children requiring intervention for common congenital vascular stenosis (i.e., coarctation of the aorta and/or pulmonary artery stenosis) who are indicated for treatment.

Interventions

DEVICECatheterized Stenting

Catheterized stenting of vascular narrowings.

Sponsors

Renata Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

include: * The subject's legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the clinical investigation, agrees to its provisions, and has provided written informed consent * Requiring treatment\* of: * native, acquired, or recurrent aortic coarctation, or * native, acquired, or recurrent pulmonary artery stenosis \*As defined by the patient's medical team * Patency of at least one femoral vein, femoral artery, jugular vein or both carotid arteries able to accommodate the delivery system * Adjacent vessel to stenosis measuring \> or equal to 4 mm

Exclusion criteria

include: * Active bloodstream infection requiring antibiotic therapy within 3 days prior to stent implantation * History of or active endocarditis (active treatment with antibiotics) within 180 days prior to stent implantation * Aortic or pulmonary artery aneurysm in the location targeted for treatment * Body weight \< 1.5 kg * Anatomic location of lesion judged by the investigator to not lend to the safe placement of a stent * Target vessels larger or smaller than the Minima System balloon size ranges * Known genetic syndrome known to be associated with vasculopathies such as but not limited to Williams syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, etc * Clinical scenario requiring that more than one vessel needs stent implantation at the time of the trial procedure. * Currently participating in an investigational drug study or another device study * Major or progressive non-cardiac disease resulting in a life expectancy of less than six months * Known hypersensitivity to aspirin or heparin and cannot be treated with other antiplatelet and/or antithrombotic medications * Known hypersensitivity to cobalt-chromium or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Demonstrating Clinical Success at 6 MonthsThrough 6-month follow-up VisitThe primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed as the rate of clinical success, with the performance goal defined as a clinical success rate of greater than 77%. Clinical success is defined as: * Stenosis relief, defined by stent outer diameter ≥ 75% of the surrounding vessel immediately after deployment. * Freedom from open surgical intervention required to treat Minima Stent disfunction through 6 months. * Maintenance of stented vessel diameter ≥ 50% of post-implant diameter at 6 months; as measured using CT angiography and/or angiography.
Number of Participants With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events at 6 MonthsThrough 6-month follow-up VisitThe primary safety endpoint will be assessed as the percentage of cases with freedom from procedure- or device-related SAEs resulting in an event listed below, with the performance goal defined as greater than 78% of cases: * Death * Cardiac arrest and/or emergency ECMO cannulation * Stroke * Limb loss * Vessel dissection of target lesion * Device thrombosis/occlusion * Cardiac perforation requiring percutaneous or open surgical intervention * Persistent cardiac arrhythmia requiring a pacemaker

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Freedom From Stent Embolization or Migration at 6 Months6 monthsFreedom from stent embolization or migration through 6 months.
Number of Patients With Freedom From Stent Fracture at 6 Months6 monthsFreedom from stent fracture that led to reintervention through 6 months
Number of Patients With Arterial to Arterial Peak-to-peak Pressure Gradient of < 20 mmHgimmediately after deploymentWhen a pressure gradient provides a reliable hemodynamic variable (e.g., coarctation of the aorta), a reduction in ventricle to arterial or arterial to arterial peak-to-peak pressure gradient to \< 20 mmHg after stent placement.
Number of Patients With Freedom From Procedure- or Device-related SAE During Re-dilationImmediately after re-dilationFreedom from procedure- or device-related SAE during re-dilation that results in the following: * Death * Cardiac arrest and/or emergency ECMO cannulation * Stroke * Limb loss * Vessel dissection of target lesion * Device thrombosis/occlusion * Cardiac perforation requiring percutaneous or open surgical intervention * Persistent cardiac arrhythmia requiring a pacemaker
Number of Patients With Freedom From Non-elective Minima Stent Explant at 90-days Post Re-dilation90 days post re-dilationFreedom from non-elective Minima Stent explant at 90-days post re-dilation procedure
Successful Stent Re-dilation at Re-catheterizationImmediately after re-dilationSuccessful stent re-dilation (when indicated) at re-catheterization, defined as an increase in the intra stent angiographic luminal diameter within 2mm of the adjacent native vessel diameter immediately after re-dilation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Treated
The All Treated (AT) population is defined as all subjects who signed informed consent, meet eligibility criteria and for whom a procedure was begun (defined as the initiation of vascular access with the Renata Minima system).
42
Total42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Treated
Age, Continuous9 months
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Demonstrating Clinical Success at 6 Months

The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed as the rate of clinical success, with the performance goal defined as a clinical success rate of greater than 77%. Clinical success is defined as: * Stenosis relief, defined by stent outer diameter ≥ 75% of the surrounding vessel immediately after deployment. * Freedom from open surgical intervention required to treat Minima Stent disfunction through 6 months. * Maintenance of stented vessel diameter ≥ 50% of post-implant diameter at 6 months; as measured using CT angiography and/or angiography.

Time frame: Through 6-month follow-up Visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All TreatedNumber of Participants Demonstrating Clinical Success at 6 Months41 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events at 6 Months

The primary safety endpoint will be assessed as the percentage of cases with freedom from procedure- or device-related SAEs resulting in an event listed below, with the performance goal defined as greater than 78% of cases: * Death * Cardiac arrest and/or emergency ECMO cannulation * Stroke * Limb loss * Vessel dissection of target lesion * Device thrombosis/occlusion * Cardiac perforation requiring percutaneous or open surgical intervention * Persistent cardiac arrhythmia requiring a pacemaker

Time frame: Through 6-month follow-up Visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All TreatedNumber of Participants With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events at 6 Months42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Arterial to Arterial Peak-to-peak Pressure Gradient of < 20 mmHg

When a pressure gradient provides a reliable hemodynamic variable (e.g., coarctation of the aorta), a reduction in ventricle to arterial or arterial to arterial peak-to-peak pressure gradient to \< 20 mmHg after stent placement.

Time frame: immediately after deployment

Population: Patients with a Minima Stent deployed in the aortic circulation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All TreatedNumber of Patients With Arterial to Arterial Peak-to-peak Pressure Gradient of < 20 mmHg21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Freedom From Non-elective Minima Stent Explant at 90-days Post Re-dilation

Freedom from non-elective Minima Stent explant at 90-days post re-dilation procedure

Time frame: 90 days post re-dilation

Population: 20 re-dilation procedures (14 post-initial re-dilation and 6 post-second re-dilation) across 14 subjects that have reached the 90 days post re-dilation procedure endpoint for assessment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
All TreatedNumber of Patients With Freedom From Non-elective Minima Stent Explant at 90-days Post Re-dilation20 Stent Re-Dilation Procedures
Secondary

Number of Patients With Freedom From Procedure- or Device-related SAE During Re-dilation

Freedom from procedure- or device-related SAE during re-dilation that results in the following: * Death * Cardiac arrest and/or emergency ECMO cannulation * Stroke * Limb loss * Vessel dissection of target lesion * Device thrombosis/occlusion * Cardiac perforation requiring percutaneous or open surgical intervention * Persistent cardiac arrhythmia requiring a pacemaker

Time frame: Immediately after re-dilation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
All TreatedNumber of Patients With Freedom From Procedure- or Device-related SAE During Re-dilation21 Stent Re-Dilation Procedures
Secondary

Number of Patients With Freedom From Stent Embolization or Migration at 6 Months

Freedom from stent embolization or migration through 6 months.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
All TreatedNumber of Patients With Freedom From Stent Embolization or Migration at 6 Months42 Stent Implants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Freedom From Stent Fracture at 6 Months

Freedom from stent fracture that led to reintervention through 6 months

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All TreatedNumber of Patients With Freedom From Stent Fracture at 6 Months42 Participants
Secondary

Successful Stent Re-dilation at Re-catheterization

Successful stent re-dilation (when indicated) at re-catheterization, defined as an increase in the intra stent angiographic luminal diameter within 2mm of the adjacent native vessel diameter immediately after re-dilation.

Time frame: Immediately after re-dilation

Population: 15 patients have had at least one re-dilation with a total of 15 initial re-dilations and 6 second re-dilations (21 total re-dilations).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
All TreatedSuccessful Stent Re-dilation at Re-catheterization19 Stent Re-Dilation Procedures

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026