Skip to content

The Use of Flecainide for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Can Global Peak Longitudinal Strain Measurements in Combination With Non-invasive ECG Parameters Predict the Success or Failure of Flecainide Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation Patients?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05084495
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-10-19
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-04-15
Last updated
2025-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This prospective observational study will include patients with atrial fibrillation that has indication for treatement with flecainide. Included patients are followed during a 12 month period. During the follow-up period they will have four clinical visits, during which clinical data, advanced echocardiographic data (strain and speckle tracking) and ECGs (Glasgow criteria) will be collected. These data will be analysed in relation to outcome parameters as: maintaining a normal sinus rhythm (arrythmia free health status), number of AF-free months, chances of successful electrical cardioversion, frequency of side effects, risk of pro-arrhythmias and mortality. The importance of these two analyses is to improve the use of flecainide. Hence, today patients with low benefit compared to risk of adverse events are inappropriately treated with flecainide with the trial and error approach currently used. On the other hand flecainide is currently underutilized, and patients denied the treatment that could improve their quality of life, prognosis and reduce their risk of cardiovascular adverse events. By investigating novel and promising parameters there is the potential of a better prediction of initiating safe and accurate anti-arrhythmic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

Study synopsis for the Tambocor Prospective study Inclusion: Patients with atrial fibrillation that admitted to the ward for prior to start of flecainide initiation. Ethics: Informed Concent prior to inclusion. Follow up after baseline: 4 visits during 12 month. End points : Side effects that lead to discontinuation of flecainide. Persistent AF that lead to discontinuation of flecainide. Evaluated parameters: 12 lead ECG, ECHO: LA, LV, HV strain , Dynamic Heart model: LV and RV. The follow up visits: Baseline: Normal ECHO after the first dose of flecainide, ECG and Questionnaire 4 Weeks: Normal ECHO + Protocol ECHO (LA, LV, HV strain , Dynamic Heart model: LV and RV) and Questionnaire. 6 month: Normal ECHO + Protocol ECHO (LA, LV, HV strain , Dynamic Heart model: LV and RV) and Questionnaire. 12 month: Normal ECHO + Protocol ECHO (LA, LV, HV strain , Dynamic Heart model: LV and RV) and Questionnaire.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTGlobal peak atrial longitudinal strain and ECG

During the follow-up period the patient will have four clinical visits, during which clinical data, advanced echocardiographic data (strain and speckle tracking) and ECGs (Glasgow criteria) will be collected

Sponsors

Lund University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with written informed consent who are eligible for flecainide treatment for atrial fibrillation. * The patients must be followed at the Skånes hospitals northwest and Skånes university hospitals. * Age \>18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Flecainide treatment with other indication than atrial fibrillation (including atrial flutter). * No secure date for treatment start. * Age \<18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arrythmia free health statusDuring the 12 month follow upCan we predict who will maintain a normal sinus rhythm prior to initiation of flecainide? treatment start

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk of pro-arrhythmiasDuring the 12 month follow upCan we improve the diagnostic accuracy to reduce risk of pro-arrhythmias
MortalityDuring the 12 month follow upCan we improve the diagnostic accuracy to reduce risk mortality
Number of AF-free monthsDuring the 12 month follow upCan we improve the number of AF-free months by a better prediction model
Frequency of side effectsDuring the 12 month follow upCan we improve the diagnostic accuracy to reduce the frequency of side effects

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026