Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® (PD) as Compared to Mepilex Ag®

An Adaptive, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® (PD) as Compared to Mepilex Ag® Used as Standard of Care in the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Partial Thickness Burns.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05084183
Enrollment
68
Registered
2021-10-19
Start date
2022-02-02
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thermal Burn

Brief summary

A total of 68 adult and pediatric patients who suffer from at least one discrete partial thickness thermal burn wound (Grade II) will be recruited. Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to either PermeaDerm® or Mepilex Ag®. Evaluations will occur at 7, 14 and 21 days with long term follow-up at 6 and 12 months.

Detailed description

A total of 68 adult and pediatric patients who suffer from at least one discrete partial thickness thermal burn wound (Grade II) will be recruited from the clinical practices of the site Principal Investigators. Participants and/or the Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) as appropriate will be fully informed regarding the conduct of the clinical trial including all potential risks and benefits. All Participants must be consented, randomized (1:1) and treated within 72 hours of injury. It is permissible for a Study Participant to be enrolled if they have more than one burn wound. If more than one partial thickness burn is treated, the Investigator must indicate prior to randomization which wound is to be considered for primary analysis. This wound will be called the Primary Wound and is to be evaluated by a Blinded Assessor. Additional partial thickness wounds must be treated with the same product to which the Study Participant was randomized and will be included in secondary analysis. These wounds are to be described as Secondary Wounds and are to be evaluated by the Unblinded Assessor. Evaluations will occur at 7, 14 and 21 days with long term follow-up at 6 and 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEPermeaDerm®

Wound Management Device

Wound Dressing

Sponsors

Stedical Scientific, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

It is intended that blinded assessment of wounds will be performed at 14 days after treatment.

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded, adaptive, controlled clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants will be included if all the following criteria are met. 1. Able to give informed consent and undergo treatment \< 72 hours of injury (consent may be given by LAR as necessary); 2. Any adult or pediatric patient \< 75 years of age; 3. Target burn to be at least one discrete partial thickness (second degree) thermal burns \<20% total body surface area (TBSA) on anybody surface except the face; 4. Characteristics of treated wound (s) must be superficial to deep partial thickness wounds such that application of both PermeaDerm and Mepilex Ag is medically appropriate; 5. Agrees to abstain from the use of any other wound covering device for the duration of the study unless determined by the individual site Principal Investigator to be medically necessary; 6. Demonstrates the ability and willingness to follow the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if s/he meet any of the following criteria. 1. Pregnant or breastfeeding; 2. Target burn ≥ 20% TBSA; 3. Electrical burns, chemical burns, frostbite; 4. Treatment with silver sulfadiazine prior to presentation; 5. Has comorbidities and/or medications and/or health status that (at the discretion of the individual site Principal Investigator) could result in poor wound healing (some examples may include admission to intensive care unit, inhalation, or other significant burn associated conditions, uncontrolled and/or significant diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, active malignancy, autoimmune disease, smoking, drug abuse, renal failure, steroid usage.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reepithelialization14 daysTime to 100 percent- primary wound
Alternate therapy14 daysTime to conversion to alternate therapy- primary wound

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events21 daysOccurrence, duration, severity, seriousness, expectedness, and relationship of adverse events
Severity of painUp to 12 MonthsWong-Backer Faces pain rating scale and in adults as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10);
Re-epithelialization14 daysPercent reepithelialization primary and secondary Wounds
Satisfaction with treatment6 and 12 monthsBrisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP)
Dressing Changes RequiredUp to 21 DaysNumber
Scar characteristics6 and 12 monthsPatient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Alternate therapyup to 12 MonthsTime to conversion to alternate therapy- secondary wounds

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMiao Yu, Ph.D
miao.yu@stedical.com1-858-753-9530

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026