Skip to content

Must Cannulation Technique of Vascular Access in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis: Contributions for a Safe Nursing Intervention

A Randomised Control Trial of MuST Technique for Vascular Access Cannulation in Hemodialysis Patients: Contributions for a Safe Nursing Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05081648
Acronym
MuST
Enrollment
101
Registered
2021-10-18
Start date
2022-01-03
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2023-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arteriovenous Fistula, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Hemodialysis, Hemodialysis Access Failure, Vascular Access Complication

Keywords

Chronic Kidney Disease, Hemodialysis, Vascular access, Vascular Access Complication, Rope-ladder, Cannulation

Brief summary

The aims of this study are to: * Determine the AVF (arteriovenous fistula) survival of patients submitted to MuST compared to those submitted to RL (rope-ladder). * Determine the AVF (arteriovenous fistula) complication rate of patients submitted to MuST compared to those submitted to RL (rope-ladder). * Analyze the intensity of pain perceived by the patient with each cannulation technique under study.

Detailed description

The MuST is based on the association between the RL technique in that it uses the entire length of the available vessel through progressive rotation, and the buttonhole (BH) cannulation technique since there are three specific cannulation sites for each cannulation day during the week, meaning that each site is only cannulated once a week (allowing the puncture site to heal in between cannulations).

Interventions

PROCEDURECT MuST

Multiple Single Cannulation Technique (MuST): Experimental technique

PROCEDURERope-ladder cannulation technique

Standard cannulation technique( Rope-ladder)

Sponsors

University of Lisbon
CollaboratorOTHER
Lisbon School of Nursing
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

multiple-center, prospective, non-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Voluntarily agree to participate in the study and sign an informed consent; * Are on a regular haemodialysis (HD) program with three weekly sessions; * AVF has been in use for at least 4 weeks without incident; * AVF with blood flow (Qa) ≥500 mL/min evaluated by thermodilution; * AVF paths allow cannulations along the entire length of the vein with at least 6 cm of distance between bevels, or two distinct areas of 3 cm in length; * Adult patients

Exclusion criteria

* Those who decline to take part; * Those who have undergone angiography or surgical intervention in the last 4 months in the AVF in use; * Those who have undergone three or more interventions in the AVF in use; * Those with use of anesthetic creams at cannulation sites.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vascular access survival rate12 months after start of studyVascular access (VA) survival rate at 12 months and determined by the percentage of fistulas in use from the beginning of the study to the date of the first clinical intervention by angioplasty or vascular surgery, to maintain or restore patency - unassisted patency.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Arteriovenous fistula survival rate12 months after start of studyArteriovenous fistula (AVF) survival rate at 12-month and determined by the percentage of fistulas in use from the study start to the date of access abandonment due to dysfunction, patient abandonment, or death, treatment change modality or study end.

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026