Skip to content

Stress Echo 2030: the Novel ABCDE-(FGLPR) Protocol to Define the Future of Imaging

The International Stress Echo Study to to Define the Future of Imaging

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05081115
Acronym
SE2030
Enrollment
10000
Registered
2021-10-18
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Heart Transplantation, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Post-chest Radio/Chemiotherapy, Valvular Heart Disease

Keywords

effectiveness, registry, stress echo, sustainability

Brief summary

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2- SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4- SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5- Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6- Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7- SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF) ; 8- SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10- SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11- SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12- SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021-2025) ≥10 000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time and in any patient.

Detailed description

Stress echo (SE) 2020 is an international, multicenter, prospective, effectiveness study started in 2016 that conceptualized, disseminated and validated a new approach for functional testing within and beyond coronary artery disease (CAD). As originally planned, the study created the cultural, informatic and scientific infrastructure connecting high-volume, accredited SE labs, sharing common criteria of indication, execution, reporting and archiving SE. This approach allowed acquisition of original safety, feasibility, and outcome data in evidence-poor diagnostic fields, beyond the established core application of SE in CAD based on regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) assessment. SE2020 standardized procedures, validated emerging signs, and integrated new information with established knowledge, helping to build a next-generation SE lab adopting the ABCDE protocol. Each and every step of ABCDE-SE provides independent and incremental prognostic information building on the prior steps and identifies distinct patient phenotypes and vulnerabilities possibly outlining different therapeutic targets: myocardial ischemia in step A, pulmonary congestion with B-lines in step B, preload reserve and left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) in step C, coronary microcirculation with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) or real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography in step D, and cardiac autonomic balance with heart rate reserve (HRR) in step E. This shared practice can now be used as a new standard of care and a suitable platform for the next wave of studies converging towards SE 2030 and sharing with the older SE2020 study some distinct features: effectiveness study, performed in the real world with real doctors facing real clinical problems in real consecutive patients; upstream quality control of reading and direct entering of data from peripheral centers in the data bank so that evidence is obtained inside and outside highly specialized academic centers; identification of simple yet innovative objectives relevant to change the clinical practice. These features are completely different from efficacy studies, as when highly specialized centers recruit highly selected patients, the resulting data may be difficult to translate in clinical practice. For these reasons, the American Society of Echocardiography has identified already in 2013 as a top research need the development of a registry of echocardiographic information (and eventually images) that can serve as a platform for quality improvement and clinical research. Such registry data would be accessible to the research community facilitating a broad range of clinical research on the effectiveness of echocardiography for the improvement of patient management and outcome. SE2030 will establish the platform of evidence to build the perfect SE test, suitable for all patients, anywhere, anytime, also quantitative and operator independent. The need for such an ideal test is especially vital in our times, when the economic crisis, the increased awareness of cancer and non-cancer radiation damage, the pressing need for climate-neutral choices in health care, and the unavoidable trend to externalize health care are potent propelling forces, boosted by COVID pandemics, for the diffusion of a low cost, radiation-free, climate-friendly, and portable technique such as cardiovascular ultrasound. Methodology. Five important aspects will be shared by SE2030 in full continuity with SE2020, with minor adaptations and implementations. Upstream quality control. The study is a prospective registry but it is necessary to have an upstream quality control with a certified reader from each center. A mandatory quality control is necessary for conventional and innovative parameters, since the volume of activity is necessary but not sufficient to ensure the quality of reading. Peripheral reading and inclusivity. Once the reader has been certified, the peripheral reading will be directly entered in the data bank via the Redcap program property of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging. This will allow a more flexible and rapid platform, less error in data inputting and better compliance with new regulations strictly protecting privacy in clinical studies. Another feature of SE2030 is inclusivity, so that any center meeting the selection criteria can be enrolled, allowing centers traditionally outside the editorial stage but producing high quality clinical activity to contribute to generate data relevant for the scientific community. Uniform methodology. Each laboratory will adopt the preferred choice of stress among physical, pharmacologic or pacing stress according to standardized protocol in line with guidelines recommendations. Physical exercise includes semi-supine or upright bicycle exercise, and peak or post-treadmill exercise. Pharmacologic testing will be with dobutamine or vasodilators (dipyridamole, adenosine or regadenoson) according to physician preferences, patients' contraindications, local availability and cost. Pacing stress can be performed with transesophageal atrial pacing or with external programming of a permanent pacemaker. Independent of the chosen form of stress, execution, performance, archiving and interpretation of testing will follow a standardized format with the ABCDE protocol. From the technical viewpoint of success rate, a limiting step is step D. Step D is easy and feasible with vasodilator, less easy but still highly feasible with dobutamine, not easy and less feasible with semi-supine exercise, and virtually impossible with (peak or post) treadmill exercise. Therefore, our recommendation is to use semi-supine exercise, capturing coronary flow signal in early or intermediate stages of exercise when most flow increase occurs and feasibility is still high, before it drops at higher levels of exercise. When treadmill is used, step D is skipped; if information is deemed important, a vasodilator test can be performed at 30' after the end of exercise focused on CFVR and heart rate response. All laboratories will be granted with free artificial intelligence (AI) software and encouraged to use ultrasound enhancing agents when needed to help leading edge technology upgrade and uniformity of methods across all study laboratories . The full spectrum of enrolled patients evaluated for clinically relevant endpoints. The various projects will include patients with known or suspected CAD (project 1), known or suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (project 2), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM, project 3), status post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (project 4), repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (project 7), cardio-pulmonary involvement post-COVID 19 (project 8), post-ischemic (project 10) and primary valvular heart disease (project 11) and suspected coronary vasospasm, a diagnosis frequently missed but important to recognize as a possible cause of life-threatening disease, which is easy to treat when promptly identified (project 12). The 12 protocols running on the SE-ABCDE platform are spread all over the spectrum of cardiovascular disease, from severe valvular heart disease to suspected CAD in patients with normal LV function. Potential heart donors with brain death will be evaluated to assess the suitability for donation of hearts currently dismissed on the basis of clinical history criteria but in the absence of a cardiac functional evaluation (project 9). The study will exploit and possibly contribute to upgrade the leading edge quantitative and operator-independent technology of AI-SE and cardiac strain (project 5) for image interpretation and data analysis and will also evaluate the results of SE parameters in the context of powerful environmental modulators of stress results and/or long-term outcome such as air pollutants and medical radiation exposure analyzed through big data mining with AI (project 6). The overarching aim of the study is to make SE practice more uniform, versatile, standardized, quantitative and evidence-rich, producing data potentially relevant to change clinical practice. Sponsored by a professional scientific society. The study is investigator-driven and not industry-driven. It is endorsed by an independent-not for profit professional society (Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging) and not sponsored by industry, although some materials useful for project completion such as AI-software will be donated by industrial partners for recruiting centers.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTABCDE-Stress Echo

Each laboratory will adopt the preferred Echo stress among physical pharmacologic or pacing stress according to guidelines recommendations. Pharmacologic testing will be with dobutamine or vasodilators (dipyridamole, adenosine or regadenoson) according to physician preferences, patients' contraindications, local availability and cost. Pacing stress can be performed with transesophageal or with external permanent pacemaker. A standardized format with the ABCDE protocol will be followedl. Step D is easy with vasodilator, less easy with dobutamine, not easy and less feasible - impossible with (peak or post) treadmill exercise. Our recommendation is to use semi-supine exercise, capturing coronary flow signal in early or intermediate stages when most flow increases and feasibility is still high. When treadmill is used, step D is skipped; if information is deemed important, a vasodilator test can be performed at 30' after the end of exercise focused on CFVR and heart rate response.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSE diastolic assessment

The diastolic assessment should be included into all exercise SE tests by measuring standard Doppler-derived mitral inflow velocity, pulsed Tissue Doppler of mitral annulus, and retrograde tricuspid gradient of tricuspid regurgitation, at intermediate load of exercise and/or 1- 2 min after the end of the exercise. We will also assess, at baseline, intermediate load (50 watts) and peak-post stress: end-diastolic left ventricular volume index; end-systolic left ventricular volume index; ejection fraction and both stroke volume and cardiac output (to assess conventional contractile reserve); mitral regurgitation and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; pulmonary artery systolic pressure; B-lines; right ventricular free wall strain to assess the presence of right ventricular dysfunction; left atrial volume index; peak atrial longitudinal strain; and mitral inflow E velocity and mitral annulus e' tissue Doppler velocity; global longitudinal strain (GLS).

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSE Right ventricular function assessment

Right ventricular function will be assessed at baseline and peak stress with variations of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, an index of right ventricular longitudinal function, and right ventricular fractional area change (a load-dependent index of right ventricular inlet function). To distinguish between genuine right ventricular dysfunction and/or pathological increases in pulmonary vascular load, we will combine systolic pulmonary artery pressure and right ventricular end-systolic area to calculate right ventricular end-systolic pressure-area relation. Peak systolic tricuspid annulus velocity and conventional indices of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function will also be measured at baseline and peak stress according to the standard ABCDE-FGLPR protocol. Right ventricular free wall strain combined with interventricular septum strain will be assessed. Left ventricular function, wall motion score index and E/e' at baseline and peak stress.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSE in heart donors

The examination of the heart starts with a resting transthoracic echocardiography. Exclusion criteria are: resting wall motion score index\>1.0; ejection fraction \<45%; diastolic dysfunction of grade 2 or more; hemodynamically significant (moderate or higher) valve regurgitation or stenosis; severe left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index \>175 g/m2). A pharmacological SE with dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg over 6 minutes) is recommended. The diagnostic end-points are stress-induced RWMA and abnormalities in global LVCR. All images will be analyzed as per guidelines similarly to the other projects, with emphasis on wall motion score index and LVCR based on ejection fraction and force. The hearts excluded from donation for RWMA or abnormal LVCR could however be collected for heart valve preparation and evaluated by coronary angiography and by pathological examination according to local facilities.

Sponsors

National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo e Hospital de Cidade, Passo Fundo, Brasil
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, Ravenna, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute of Family Medicine, University of Szeged, Hungary
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Montepulciano Hospital, Siena
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Pisa
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Pleven, Bulgaria
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Szeged, Hungary
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Elisabeth Hospital, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
DASA, San Paolo, Brasil
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Banja Luka University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of A Coruna, La Coruna, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Università Luigi Vanvitelli della Campania
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dolo Hospital, Venice, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje, School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Investigaciones Medicas
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bieganski Hospital, Medical University, Lodz, Poland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Federal University of Paranà, Curitiba, Brasil
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Siriraj Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Careggi Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, Russian Federation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Clinical Hospital Zvezdara, Medical School, University of Belgrade, Serbia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Center Serbia, Medical School, University of Belgrade, Serbia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Padua, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Study, Pisa
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Siena, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Vilnius University, Lithuania
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Parma
CollaboratorOTHER
Universita di Verona
CollaboratorOTHER
Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
CollaboratorOTHER
Presidio Ospedale San Paolo. Milano
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
IRCCS reggio emilia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Association for Public Health Salute Pubblica, Brindisi, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Catania
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale San Camillo, Rome, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Salerno
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Algarve, Portugal.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Heart Center, Hospital da Cruz Vermelha, Lisbon
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Bari
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Motta di Livenza, Treviso
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
CollaboratorOTHER
Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
San Luca Hospital, Lucca
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Sao José, Criciuma, Brasil
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fatebenefratelli Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Known or suspected coronary artery disease Hypertrofic cardiomiopathy Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Primary valvular disease

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All cause death5 yearsDeath from any cause occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
Cardiac death5 yearsDeath from cardiac cause occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
Diagnosis of Cancer5 yearsDiagnosis of cancer of any type occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Miectomy procedure5 yearsMiectomy procedure date occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction5 yearsDiagnosi of hospitalization for acute Myocardial infarction occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
Implantable Cardioverter defibrillator implantation5 yearsImplantable Cardioverter defibrillator implantation date occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
Coronary percutaneous revascolarization5 yearsCoronary percutaneous revascolarization date occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment
CABG surgery5 yearsCABG surgery date occurring between 5 years after the time of SE enrollment

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactQuirino Ciampi, MD
qciampi@gmail.com+393389166076

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026