Skip to content

Ocular Effects of Scleral Lens Wear on Dry Eye Patients

Ocular Effects of Scleral Lens Wear on Dry Eye Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05079321
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-10-15
Start date
2022-04-14
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of scleral contact lens wear on a DE population using coated (Hydra-PEG) and uncoated (control) lenses. Symptoms of DE, quality of the tear film, quality of life, epithelial and overall corneal thickness, vision and comfort will be assessed before and after dispensing and wearing the lenses for four weeks.

Interventions

DEVICEHydra-PEG

Zen™ RC scleral lenses (Hydra-PEG coated)

DEVICEUncoated

Zen™ RC scleral lenses (non-coated)

Sponsors

University of Waterloo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she: * Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer. * Has read, understood, and signed the information consent letter. * Has been diagnosed with dry eyes. * Has reduced tear break up time (NITBUT) and/or reduced tear meniscus height (TMH), clinical sign of dry eye disease and contact lens discomfort or is symptomatic of dry eye. * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule. * Has greater than 13 points on the OSDI. * Has greater than 4 points on the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED).

Exclusion criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she: * Is using any topical medications that will likely affect the study outcome. * Has undergone any form of corneal surgery. * Has any known allergies or sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals or products, such as fluorescein, used in this study. * Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye not related to the signs of dry eye. * Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities and active neovascularization on the cornea. * Anatomic variations of the conjunctiva that can impair proper scleral or soft contact lens wear/fitting * Ocular pathology other than dry eye (e.g. glaucoma, macular degeneration) which may significantly impact visual function and assessment. * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study. * Has any active ocular infection and may require topical medications. * Currently taking any systemic medication that may affect the study outcome. * Is pregnant * Has been diagnosed, recovered, or tested positive but asymptomatic with COVID-19.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Corneal ThicknessAt screeningMean corneal thickness as measured with Pentacam HR (µm)
Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) ScoreAfter 2 weeks of wear of coated lensThe CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst).
Tear Film OsmolarityAt screeningTear film osmolarity measures with a Tearlab Osmolarity System
Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire ScoreAfter 4 weeks of wear of uncoated lensThis self-administered Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) questionnaire uses 28-item questions which are categorized into five main parameters: daily activities, eye symptoms, functional vision, psychometric properties, and refractive correction. Each question has a five-step response scale (none = 1; little = 2; moderate = 3; extreme = 4 and unable = 5). The responses are computed using the formula: CLIQperson measure = 34.41 × log (CLIQraw score/5 - CLIQraw score) + 26.69. This is then analyzed on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better QoL.
Percentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear FilmAt screeningPercentage of participants with a positive MMP-9 test, as measured by InflammaDry

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at a single site between April 2022 and October 2022. The first participant was enrolled on April 14, 2022 and the last participant was enrolled on October 25, 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Of 30 enrolled participants, 28 met inclusion criteria and 25 were randomized to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Group
All suitable participants eligible to take part in the study.
28
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants
Age, Continuous28.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.61
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
African/Black
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Arab
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Indian
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score

The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst).

Time frame: After 2 weeks of wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score19.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score17.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.55
p-value: 0.49t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score

The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst).

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score18.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.99
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score15.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.65
p-value: 0.33t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score

The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst).

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score13.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score19.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.64
p-value: 0.07t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score

The CLDEQ-8 is a validated questionnaire used to quantify symptoms experienced by the contact lenses (CLs) wearer. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions about how their CLs performed over the preceding 2-week period. 4 questions (Eye discomfort, Eye dryness, Changeable blurry vision and Closing your eyes) answered on a scale of 0=Never to 4=Constantly; 3 questions about the end of wearing time (Discomfort, Dryness, Changeable blurry vision) answered on a scale of 0=Never have it to 5=Very Intense and 1 question (Removing your lenses) on a scale of 1=Never to 6=Several times a day for a total possible score of 1(best) to 37 (worst).

Time frame: After 2 weeks of wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score14.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.92
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) Score20.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score

This self-administered Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) questionnaire uses 28-item questions which are categorized into five main parameters: daily activities, eye symptoms, functional vision, psychometric properties, and refractive correction. Each question has a five-step response scale (none = 1; little = 2; moderate = 3; extreme = 4 and unable = 5). The responses are computed using the formula: CLIQperson measure = 34.41 × log (CLIQraw score/5 - CLIQraw score) + 26.69. This is then analyzed on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better QoL.

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score40.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.49
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score40.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
p-value: 0.97t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score

This self-administered Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) questionnaire uses 28-item questions which are categorized into five main parameters: daily activities, eye symptoms, functional vision, psychometric properties, and refractive correction. Each question has a five-step response scale (none = 1; little = 2; moderate = 3; extreme = 4 and unable = 5). The responses are computed using the formula: CLIQperson measure = 34.41 × log (CLIQraw score/5 - CLIQraw score) + 26.69. This is then analyzed on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better QoL.

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensContact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score37.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.37
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensContact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire Score39.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
p-value: 0.71t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Mean Corneal Thickness

Mean corneal thickness as measured with Pentacam HR (µm)

Time frame: After 4 weeks wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness552.70 micronsStandard Deviation 26.96
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness559.85 micronsStandard Deviation 35.31
p-value: 0.36t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Mean Corneal Thickness

Mean corneal thickness as measured with Pentacam HR (µm)

Time frame: At screening

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness570.54 micronsStandard Deviation 38.97
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness560.73 micronsStandard Deviation 31.48
p-value: 0.25t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Mean Corneal Thickness

Mean corneal thickness as measured with Pentacam HR (µm)

Time frame: After 4 weeks wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness556.91 micronsStandard Deviation 29.83
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensMean Corneal Thickness556.87 micronsStandard Deviation 29.92
p-value: 1t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Percentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film

Percentage of participants with a positive MMP-9 test, as measured by InflammaDry

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film50 percentage of participants
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film60 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.69Fisher Exact
Primary

Percentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film

Percentage of participants with a positive MMP-9 test, as measured by InflammaDry

Time frame: At screening

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film83.33 percentage of participants
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film84.62 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.75Fisher Exact
Primary

Percentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film

Percentage of participants with a positive MMP-9 test, as measured by InflammaDry

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film80 percentage of participants
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensPercentage of Participants With MMP-9 Inflammatory Marker in Tear Film70 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.59Fisher Exact
Primary

Tear Film Osmolarity

Tear film osmolarity measures with a Tearlab Osmolarity System

Time frame: At screening

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity313.29 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 22.18
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity309.69 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 16.32
p-value: 0.65t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Tear Film Osmolarity

Tear film osmolarity measures with a Tearlab Osmolarity System

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of coated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity304.40 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 8.48
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity303.90 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 11.57
p-value: 0.91t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Tear Film Osmolarity

Tear film osmolarity measures with a Tearlab Osmolarity System

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear of uncoated lens

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coated/Uncoated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity300.00 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 12.87
Uncoated/Coated Scleral LensTear Film Osmolarity306.05 mOsm/lStandard Deviation 12.87

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026