Skip to content

Study of Magrolimab Versus Placebo in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Magrolimab Versus Placebo in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05079230
Acronym
ENHANCE-3
Enrollment
378
Registered
2021-10-15
Start date
2022-07-07
Completion date
2024-04-11
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical study is to compare the study drugs, magrolimab + venetoclax + azacitidine, versus placebo + venetoclax + azacitidine in participants with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not able to have chemotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGMagrolimab

Administered intravenously (IV)

DRUGVenetoclax

Tablets administered orally

DRUGAzacitidine

Administered according to region-specific drug labeling, either subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV)

DRUGPlacebo

Administered intravenously (IV)

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Previously untreated individuals with histological confirmation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria who are ineligible for treatment with a standard cytarabine and anthracycline induction regimen due to age, or comorbidity. Individuals must be considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, defined by the following: * ≥ 75 years of age; Or * ≥ 18 to 74 years of age with at least 1 of the following comorbidities: * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or 3 * Diffusing capacity of the lung of carbon monoxide ≤ 65% or forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤ 65% * Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50% * Baseline creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min to \< 45 mL/min calculated by the Cockcroft Gault formula or measured by 24-hour urine collection * Hepatic disorder with total bilirubin \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Any other comorbidity that the investigator judges to be incompatible with intensive chemotherapy * ECOG performance status: * Of 0 to 2 for individuals ≥ 75 years of age Or * Of 0 to 3 for individuals ≥ 18 to 74 years of age * Individuals with white blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 20 x 10\^3/μL prior to randomization. If the individual's WBC is \> 20 x10\^3/μL prior to randomization, the individual can be enrolled, assuming all other eligibility criteria are met. However, the WBC should be ≤ 20 x 10\^3/μL prior to the first dose of study treatment and prior to each magrolimab/placebo dose during Cycle 1. * Note: Individuals can be treated with hydroxyurea and/or leukapheresis prior to randomization and throughout the study to reduce the WBC to ≤ 20 x 10\^3/μL to enable eligibility for study drug dosing * Hemoglobin must be ≥ 9 g/dL prior to initial dose of study treatment * Note: Transfusions are allowed to meet hemoglobin eligibility * Pretreatment blood cross-match completed Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with any of the following: * cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47) or signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα)-targeting agents * Antileukemic therapy for the treatment of AML (eg, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), low-dose cytarabine, and/or venetoclax), excluding hydroxyurea * Note: Individuals with prior MDS who have not received prior HMAs or venetoclax or chemotherapeutic agents for MDS may be enrolled in the study. Prior treatment with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) therapies including, but not limited to lenalidomide, erythroid-stimulating agents, or similar red blood cell negative (RBC-), white blood cell negative (WBC-), or platelet-direct therapies or growth factors is allowed for these individuals. * Clinical suspicion of or documented active central nervous system (CNS) involvement with AML * Individuals who have acute promyelocytic leukemia * Second malignancy, except MDS, treated basal cell or localized squamous skin carcinomas, localized prostate cancer, or other malignancies for which individuals are not on active anticancer therapies and have had no evidence of active malignancy for at least 1 year Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 1.6 yearsOS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants were censored at last known alive date. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Magrolimab AntibodiesUp to 1.6 yearsPercentages were rounded off.
Rate of Complete Remission (CR) + Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)Up to 1.6 yearsThe CR + CRh rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR (including CR without minimal residual disease (CRMRD-) and CR with positive or unknown MRD (CRMRD+/unk)) or CRh as defined by CR with partial platelet and absolute neutrophil count recovery within 6 cycles of treatment while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy or stem cell transplant (SCT). CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk: neutrophils \>1.0 ×10\^9/L, platelets \>100 ×10\^9/L, \<5% bone marrow blasts, no circulating blasts or extramedullary disease (confirmed by flow cytometry \<0.1% sensitivity for CRMRD-) within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. Each cycle was of 28 days.
Rate of Complete Remission (CR)Up to 1.6 yearsCR was defined as the percentage of the participants who achieved CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) within 6 cycles of treatment as determined by the investigator while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy or stem cell transplant (SCT) within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Definitions for CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk were mentioned in outcome measure #2. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. Each cycle was of 28 days.
Event-Free Survival (EFS)Up to 1.6 yearsEFS was defined as time from the date of randomization to the earliest date of the documented relapse from CR, treatment failure (defined as failure to achieve CR within 6 cycles of treatment), or death from any cause within the response window. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. CR is defined in outcome measure 2.
Duration of CR + CRh in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)Up to 1.6 yearsThe duration of CR + CRh was measured from the time the assessment criteria were first met for CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) or CRh within 6 cycles of treatment until the first date of AML relapse or death (including assessments post SCT). Those who were not observed to have relapsed disease or death while on study were censored at the date of their last response assessment with no evidence of relapse on or prior to the data cut off date within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Participants started taking new anti-AML therapies (excluding post-SCT maintenance therapy) before relapse, duration of CR + CRh were censored at the last response assessment before the initiation of the new anti-AML therapies. CR and CRh are defined in Outcome Measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days.
Duration of Complete Remission (DCR) in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)Up to 1.6 yearsThe DCR was measured from the time the assessment criteria were first met for CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) within 6 cycles of treatment until the first date of AML relapse or death (including assessments post SCT). Those who were not observed to have relapsed disease or death while on study were censored at the date of their last response assessment with no evidence of relapse on or prior to the data cutoff date within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Participants started taking new anti-AML therapies (excluding post-SCT maintenance therapy) before relapse, DCR were censored at the last response assessment before the initiation of the new anti-AML therapies. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk are defined in outcome measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days.
Rate of CR/CRh Without Minimal Residual Disease (CR/CRhMRD-)Up to 1.6 yearsThe CR/CRhMRD- rate was the percentage of participants who achieved a CRMRD- or CRhMRD- within 6 cycles of treatment while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-AML therapy or SCT within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Each cycle was of 28 days. KM estimates were used for outcome measure analysis. CRhMRD- : neutrophils \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L; platelets \> 50 x 10\^9/L; bone marrow blasts \< 5%; MRD negative (determined using multiparameter flow cytometry with a sensitivity of \< 0.1%). Absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease. Percentages were rounded off.
Rate of CR Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-)Up to 1.6 yearsThe CRMRD- rate was the percentage of participants who achieved a CRMRD- within 6 cycles of treatment SCT within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. CRMRD is defined in outcome measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days. Percentages were rounded off
Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence Conversion RateUp to 1.6 yearsThe RBC transfusion independence conversion rate was the percentage of participants who had a 56-day or longer period with no RBC or whole blood transfusions at any time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and discontinuation of study treatment among all participants who were RBC transfusion dependent at baseline. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis.
Platelet Transfusion Independence Conversion RateUp to 1.6 yearsThe platelet transfusion independence conversion rate was the percentage of participants who had a 56-day or longer period with no platelet transfusions at any time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and discontinuation of study treatment among all participants who were platelet transfusion dependent at baseline. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis.
Time to First Deterioration (TTD) on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) ScaleUp to 1.6 yearsThe TTD on the EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scale was defined as time from the date of randomization to the time a participant experienced at least 1 threshold value deterioration from baseline or death, whichever was earlier. Questionnaire includes 30 questions resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning), 1 GHS/QoL scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). After linear transformation, all scales and single item measures range in score from 0-100. Higher score on GHS/QoL scale meant better GHS/QoL. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.
Time to First Deterioration (TTD) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning ScaleUp to 1.6 yearsThe TTD on the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale was defined as time from the date of randomization to the time a participant experienced at least 1 threshold value deterioration from baseline or death, whichever is earlier. Physical functioning scale is one of the five functional scales of the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. After linear transformation, scale range in score from 0-100. A higher score on functional scales means better functioning and better quality of life. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)First dose date up to 1.4 years plus 70 daysAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 70 days after the study drug last dose date or the day before initiation of new anti-AML therapy including stem cell transplantation, whichever is earlier. Percentages were rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Laboratory AbnormalitiesFirst dose date up to 1.4 years, plus 70 daysTreatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increased by at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any postbaseline time point, up to and including the date of the last dose of study drug plus 70 days or the day before the initiation of new anti-AML therapy including SCT, whichever came first, and were summarized by treatment group. Severity grades were defined by the CTCAE Version 5.0. 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Life-Threatening; 5 = Death. Percentages were rounded-off.
Serum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimePredose on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29; Predose on Day 57 and 1 hour post-dose; Predose on Day 113, Day 169, Day 253, and Day 337.
Maximum Levels of Serum Anti-Magrolimab AntibodiesUp to 1.6 years

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

502 participants were screened.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in Asia, Europe, North America and Australia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + Azacitidine
Participants received magrolimab 1 mg/kg priming dose intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 4; 15 mg/kg on Day 8; and 30 mg/kg on Days 11, 15, and then every week for 5 doses, and every 2 weeks thereafter; venetoclax 100 mg orally on Cycle 1 Day 1, 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 2, 400 mg on Cycle 1 Day 3, and daily thereafter; azacitidine 75 mg/m² subcutaneously (SC) or IV on Days 1-7 or Days 1-5 and 8-9 of each cycle up to 1.4 years. Each cycle was of 28 days.
189
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + Azacitidine
Participants received magrolimab matching placebo IV on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, and 15, then every week for 5 doses and every 2 weeks thereafter; venetoclax 100 mg orally on Cycle 1 Day 1, 200 mg on Cycle 1 Day 2, 400 mg on Cycle 1 Day 3 and daily thereafter; azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2 SC or IV on Days 1-7 or Days 1-5 and 8-9 of each cycle up to 1.4 years. Each cycle was of 28 days.
189
Total378

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath7266
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor101102
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent1618

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMagrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineMagrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineTotal
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Age, Customized
< 75 Years
91 Participants93 Participants184 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 75 Years
98 Participants96 Participants194 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants18 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
149 Participants149 Participants298 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
28 Participants22 Participants50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
25 Participants26 Participants51 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
30 Participants26 Participants56 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
130 Participants130 Participants260 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
24 Participants16 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
2 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
25 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 Participants46 Participants93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants73 Participants156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
106 Participants116 Participants222 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
84 / 18970 / 189
other
Total, other adverse events
180 / 189179 / 184
serious
Total, serious adverse events
138 / 189134 / 184

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants were censored at last known alive date. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineOverall Survival (OS)10.7 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineOverall Survival (OS)14.1 months
p-value: 0.327695% CI: [0.848, 1.637]stratified log-rank test
Secondary

Duration of Complete Remission (DCR) in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)

The DCR was measured from the time the assessment criteria were first met for CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) within 6 cycles of treatment until the first date of AML relapse or death (including assessments post SCT). Those who were not observed to have relapsed disease or death while on study were censored at the date of their last response assessment with no evidence of relapse on or prior to the data cutoff date within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Participants started taking new anti-AML therapies (excluding post-SCT maintenance therapy) before relapse, DCR were censored at the last response assessment before the initiation of the new anti-AML therapies. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk are defined in outcome measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set who achieved CR within 6 cycle in all participants were analyzed. Each cycle was of 28 days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineDuration of Complete Remission (DCR) in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)9.4 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineDuration of Complete Remission (DCR) in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)8.1 months
Secondary

Duration of CR + CRh in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)

The duration of CR + CRh was measured from the time the assessment criteria were first met for CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) or CRh within 6 cycles of treatment until the first date of AML relapse or death (including assessments post SCT). Those who were not observed to have relapsed disease or death while on study were censored at the date of their last response assessment with no evidence of relapse on or prior to the data cut off date within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Participants started taking new anti-AML therapies (excluding post-SCT maintenance therapy) before relapse, duration of CR + CRh were censored at the last response assessment before the initiation of the new anti-AML therapies. CR and CRh are defined in Outcome Measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set who achieved CR + CRh within 6 cycles were analyzed. Each cycle was of 28 days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineDuration of CR + CRh in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)9.4 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineDuration of CR + CRh in Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)9.2 months
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as time from the date of randomization to the earliest date of the documented relapse from CR, treatment failure (defined as failure to achieve CR within 6 cycles of treatment), or death from any cause within the response window. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis. CR is defined in outcome measure 2.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineEvent-Free Survival (EFS)0.0 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineEvent-Free Survival (EFS)1.7 months
p-value: 0.790395% CI: [0.73, 1.225]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Levels of Serum Anti-Magrolimab Antibodies

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Data is reported for participants in the Immunogenicity Analysis Set with quantifiable measurement for ADA for magrolimab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineMaximum Levels of Serum Anti-Magrolimab Antibodies40 titerStandard Deviation 67.33
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities

Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increased by at least 1 toxicity grade from baseline at any postbaseline time point, up to and including the date of the last dose of study drug plus 70 days or the day before the initiation of new anti-AML therapy including SCT, whichever came first, and were summarized by treatment group. Severity grades were defined by the CTCAE Version 5.0. 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Life-Threatening; 5 = Death. Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: First dose date up to 1.4 years, plus 70 days

Population: Participants in the Safety Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities99.5 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product or other protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than 70 days after the study drug last dose date or the day before initiation of new anti-AML therapy including stem cell transplantation, whichever is earlier. Percentages were rounded-off.

Time frame: First dose date up to 1.4 years plus 70 days

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment, with treatment assignments designated according to the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)99.5 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePercentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Magrolimab Antibodies

Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: The participants in the Immunogenicity Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. The Immunogenicity Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of magrolimab and had at least one evaluable anti-magrolimab antibody test result.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePercentage of Participants With Anti-Magrolimab Antibodies2.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Platelet Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate

The platelet transfusion independence conversion rate was the percentage of participants who had a 56-day or longer period with no platelet transfusions at any time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and discontinuation of study treatment among all participants who were platelet transfusion dependent at baseline. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set with Platelet transfusion dependence at Baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePlatelet Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate48.6 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidinePlatelet Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate47.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.57995% CI: [0.62, 2.36]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Rate of Complete Remission (CR)

CR was defined as the percentage of the participants who achieved CR (including CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk) within 6 cycles of treatment as determined by the investigator while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy or stem cell transplant (SCT) within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Definitions for CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk were mentioned in outcome measure #2. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. Each cycle was of 28 days.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of Complete Remission (CR)41.3 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of Complete Remission (CR)46.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.467995% CI: [0.56, 1.307]Stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Rate of Complete Remission (CR) + Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)

The CR + CRh rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR (including CR without minimal residual disease (CRMRD-) and CR with positive or unknown MRD (CRMRD+/unk)) or CRh as defined by CR with partial platelet and absolute neutrophil count recovery within 6 cycles of treatment while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy or stem cell transplant (SCT). CRMRD- and CRMRD+/unk: neutrophils \>1.0 ×10\^9/L, platelets \>100 ×10\^9/L, \<5% bone marrow blasts, no circulating blasts or extramedullary disease (confirmed by flow cytometry \<0.1% sensitivity for CRMRD-) within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. Each cycle was of 28 days.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat analysis set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of Complete Remission (CR) + Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)47.6 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of Complete Remission (CR) + Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)53.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.361695% CI: [0.545, 1.251]Stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Rate of CR/CRh Without Minimal Residual Disease (CR/CRhMRD-)

The CR/CRhMRD- rate was the percentage of participants who achieved a CRMRD- or CRhMRD- within 6 cycles of treatment while on study prior to initiation of any new anti-AML therapy or SCT within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Each cycle was of 28 days. KM estimates were used for outcome measure analysis. CRhMRD- : neutrophils \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L; platelets \> 50 x 10\^9/L; bone marrow blasts \< 5%; MRD negative (determined using multiparameter flow cytometry with a sensitivity of \< 0.1%). Absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease. Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of CR/CRh Without Minimal Residual Disease (CR/CRhMRD-)24.3 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of CR/CRh Without Minimal Residual Disease (CR/CRhMRD-)22.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.487395% CI: [0.727, 1.945]Stratum-adjusted Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Rate of CR Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-)

The CRMRD- rate was the percentage of participants who achieved a CRMRD- within 6 cycles of treatment SCT within the response assessment window of 1.6 years. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis. CRMRD is defined in outcome measure #2. Each cycle was of 28 days. Percentages were rounded off

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of CR Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-)21.7 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRate of CR Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-)20.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.584295% CI: [0.69, 1.932]Stratum-adjusted Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate

The RBC transfusion independence conversion rate was the percentage of participants who had a 56-day or longer period with no RBC or whole blood transfusions at any time between the date of the first dose of study treatment and discontinuation of study treatment among all participants who were RBC transfusion dependent at baseline. Percentages were rounded-off. Clopper-Pearson method were used in outcome measure analysis.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set with RBC transfusion dependence at Baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRed Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate51.7 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineRed Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence Conversion Rate58.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.300395% CI: [0.492, 1.245]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Magrolimab Over Time

Time frame: Predose on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29; Predose on Day 57 and 1 hour post-dose; Predose on Day 113, Day 169, Day 253, and Day 337.

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis Set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of magrolimab and have at least 1 measurable (non - below the limit of quantitation (BLQ) numeric values) post-treatment serum concentration of magrolimab with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 1 Predose0 µg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 8 Predose0 µg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 15 Predose291 µg/mLStandard Deviation 123
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 29 Predose385 µg/mLStandard Deviation 206
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 57 Predose503 µg/mLStandard Deviation 230
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 57, 1 h Postdose1060 µg/mLStandard Deviation 289
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 113 Predose281 µg/mLStandard Deviation 140
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 169 Predose274 µg/mLStandard Deviation 120
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 253 Predose322 µg/mLStandard Deviation 151
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineSerum Concentration of Magrolimab Over TimeDay 337 Predose298 µg/mLStandard Deviation 72.9
Secondary

Time to First Deterioration (TTD) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale

The TTD on the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale was defined as time from the date of randomization to the time a participant experienced at least 1 threshold value deterioration from baseline or death, whichever is earlier. Physical functioning scale is one of the five functional scales of the EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire. After linear transformation, scale range in score from 0-100. A higher score on functional scales means better functioning and better quality of life. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineTime to First Deterioration (TTD) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale3.0 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineTime to First Deterioration (TTD) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale3.9 months
p-value: 0.102695% CI: [0.948, 1.704]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Time to First Deterioration (TTD) on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale

The TTD on the EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scale was defined as time from the date of randomization to the time a participant experienced at least 1 threshold value deterioration from baseline or death, whichever was earlier. Questionnaire includes 30 questions resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning), 1 GHS/QoL scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). After linear transformation, all scales and single item measures range in score from 0-100. Higher score on GHS/QoL scale meant better GHS/QoL. KM estimates were used in outcome measure analysis.

Time frame: Up to 1.6 years

Population: Participants in the Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Magrolimab + Venetoclax + AzacitidineTime to First Deterioration (TTD) on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale4.7 months
Magrolimab Matching Placebo + Venetoclax + AzacitidineTime to First Deterioration (TTD) on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale5.1 months
p-value: 0.579695% CI: [0.799, 1.487]Stratified Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026