Skip to content

Assessment of Medication Optimization in Rural Kentucky Appalachian Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia

Assessment of Medication Optimization in Rural Kentucky Appalachian Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: The AMOR Kentucky Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05078437
Acronym
AMOR-KY
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-10-14
Start date
2021-10-14
Completion date
2023-05-14
Last updated
2024-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

medication optimization, rural population, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, telemedicine

Brief summary

The AMOR-Kentucky study will examine the impact of a pharmacist-physician patient-centered medication therapy management deprescribing intervention to address inappropriate medication use in patients with cognitive impairment in underserved, lower socioeconomic populations in rural Appalachian Kentucky. The results of this study will provide valuable insights on how to expand and implement deprescribing interventions using telemedicine to reduce the prevalence and the associated healthcare costs of medication-related problems in patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in rural areas throughout the US. The investigators will assess the potential use of telemedicine in this population by performing an initial single arm, unblinded study of the medication therapy management (MTM) describing intervention in rural/underserved Kentucky Appalachian populations with cognitive impairment and/or dementia using potentially inappropriate medications (n=50). Following initial recruitment and clinical evaluation, engaged participants will have their medication list reviewed by a pharmacist-clinician team to identify targets for deprescribing intervention. The intervention will be engaged remotely with the participant and their caregiver, and the MTM team at 4 weeks post initial evaluation, and then reinforced at a 3-month timepoint. This approach will be carried forward through a telemedicine practice at University of Kentucky that is comprised of approximately 500 patient-caregiver dyads throughout rural areas of Appalachian Kentucky.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMedication therapy management

The proposed deprescribing intervention is using a patient-centered framework by: (1) balancing the risks and benefits, and addressing the specific needs of each individual patient, (2) considering the individual patient and the caregiver's preferences and values, and (3) empowering the patient and the caregiver to take responsibility and fully participate in the decision-making process as equal team players.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Northern California Institute of Research and Education
CollaboratorOTHER
Daniela Moga
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 60 years or older, 2. diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia, 3. using at least one potentially inappropriate medications, 4. living in the community, 5. willing to participate in the study (both the patient and the caregiver)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness IndexBaseline and 3 monthsThe Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) is a score based on 10 criteria used to assess the appropriateness of each medication taken by a study participant. Medications are rated as appropriate, marginally appropriate, or inappropriate based on these ten criteria. Each medication was scored between 0 (appropriate) and the maximum of 18 (inappropriate for all criteria), then the total MAI was obtained by adding the medication specific MAIs for all medications reported by the participant. For each participant, the total MAI is calculated as the sum of the score for all the medications taken by that participant. The minimum is 0 (all medications are appropriate), but there is no maximum because that depends on the number of medications. A decrease in MAI indicates improvement in medication appropriateness.
Participant Satisfaction6 monthsPatients will be asked to provide feedback on participation in the deprescribing process.
Connectivity Issues3 months and 6 monthsParticipants will be asked to report on any connectivity issues that would impact the appropriate delivery of the intervention using the telemedicine approach. Number of participants that experienced any connectivity issues.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deprescribing Assessments6 monthsThe revised Patients Attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) will assess attitudes towards deprescribing
Caregiver Assessment- Zarit6 monthsThe appraisal of self-care will be used to asses additional outcomes in caregiver. Zarit Burden Interview includes 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with the sum of scores ranging between 0-88. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more was considered high burden.
Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score6 monthsThe investigators will use the cognitive battery that is incorporated in the telemedicine assessments to explore the impact of the intervention on cognitive function. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score 0: Normal (unimpaired) cognition; 0.5: MCI due to AD; 1: Mild AD dementia; 2: Moderate AD dementia; 3: Severe AD dementia

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Optimization
Participants will undergo an evaluation of all the medications taken and changes will be proposed for treatment optimization. Medication therapy management: The proposed deprescribing intervention is using a patient-centered framework by: (1) balancing the risks and benefits, and addressing the specific needs of each individual patient, (2) considering the individual patient and the caregiver's preferences and values, and (3) empowering the patient and the caregiver to take responsibility and fully participate in the decision-making process as equal team players.
16
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Optimization
Age, Continuous77 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Connectivity Issues

Participants will be asked to report on any connectivity issues that would impact the appropriate delivery of the intervention using the telemedicine approach. Number of participants that experienced any connectivity issues.

Time frame: 3 months and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionConnectivity Issues6 Participants
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index

The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) is a score based on 10 criteria used to assess the appropriateness of each medication taken by a study participant. Medications are rated as appropriate, marginally appropriate, or inappropriate based on these ten criteria. Each medication was scored between 0 (appropriate) and the maximum of 18 (inappropriate for all criteria), then the total MAI was obtained by adding the medication specific MAIs for all medications reported by the participant. For each participant, the total MAI is calculated as the sum of the score for all the medications taken by that participant. The minimum is 0 (all medications are appropriate), but there is no maximum because that depends on the number of medications. A decrease in MAI indicates improvement in medication appropriateness.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Population: For each participant, a change score was calculated based on the MAI at EOS and at baseline. A negative number indicates improvement in appropriateness. The change MAI score is averaged among participants.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionMean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.3
Primary

Participant Satisfaction

Patients will be asked to provide feedback on participation in the deprescribing process.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants undergoing the MTM intervention

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionParticipant SatisfactionStrongly Agree or Agree10 Participants
InterventionParticipant SatisfactionNeutral3 Participants
Secondary

Caregiver Assessment- Zarit

The appraisal of self-care will be used to asses additional outcomes in caregiver. Zarit Burden Interview includes 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with the sum of scores ranging between 0-88. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more was considered high burden.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCaregiver Assessment- Zarit1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score

The investigators will use the cognitive battery that is incorporated in the telemedicine assessments to explore the impact of the intervention on cognitive function. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score 0: Normal (unimpaired) cognition; 0.5: MCI due to AD; 1: Mild AD dementia; 2: Moderate AD dementia; 3: Severe AD dementia

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCognitive Function- CDR Global Score0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Deprescribing Assessments

The revised Patients Attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) will assess attitudes towards deprescribing

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants undergoing the MTM intervention

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionDeprescribing AssessmentsYes or maybe11 Participants
InterventionDeprescribing AssessmentsNo3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026