Skip to content

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Youths With Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Hong Kong

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Youths With Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Hong Kong

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05078424
Enrollment
128
Registered
2021-10-14
Start date
2021-09-29
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2021-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Symptoms, Depressive Symptoms

Keywords

Randomized Controlled Trial, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Youths, Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

Brief summary

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to examine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms for youths in Hong Kong. It is to be carried out with 120 youths aged 12 - 24 recruited from a series of community-based LevelMind@JC hubs, funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. It is designed to improve the youths' abilities/ skills in handling moods to have better emotional management. A written informed consent will be signed by participants. Researchers will perform cognitive behavioural therapy on youths who agree to join the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioural Therapy

CBT is a well-established, evidence-based intervention frequently used for easing depressive and anxiety symptoms. The intervention will be delivered for 6-7 sessions, each session lasts for 1.5 hours, in the format of a group for a period of 6-7 weeks by frontline social or youth workers trained by professional CBT clinicians. Core treatment components include mood monitoring, emotion education, behavioural activation, emotion cycle/ ABC model, identification of automatic thoughts, and cognitive restructuring. It is designed to improve youths' abilities/ skills in handling their moods to have better emotional management.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
The Boys' and Girls' Clubs Association of Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Hong Kong Federation of Youth's Group (HKFYG)
CollaboratorOTHER
Hong Kong Playground Association
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hong Kong Children and Youth Services
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
St. James' Settlement
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* LevelMind@JC users with mild to moderate distress level (n=120); * have sufficient proficiency in Chinese to understand verbal instructions and give informed consent;

Exclusion criteria

* known diagnosis of intellectual disability * organic brain disorder * photosensitive epilepsy * significant visual, auditory or balance impairment * current or previous use of illicit drugs * known psychiatric diagnosis (stabilized diagnosis and treatment) * receiving any psychosocial treatment for social withdrawal such as CBT or; * current or active suicidal ideation or attempts.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in depressive and anxiety levelsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionDepression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), scores ranging from 0-42 for each subscale, with higher scores representing worse outcome
Change in social anxiety levelsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionSocial Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS), scores ranging from 0-80 with higher scores representing higher levels of social anxiety hence worse outcome
Change in depressive levelsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), scores ranging from 0-27 with higher scores representing higher depressive levels hence worse outcome
Change in distress levelsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionKessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), scores ranging from 0-25 with higher scores representing higher distress hence worse outcome
Change in depressive symptomsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionBeck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), scores ranging from 0-63 with higher scores representing severe depressive symptoms hence worse outcome
Change in anxiety symptomsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionBeck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), scores ranging from 0-36 with higher scores representing severe anxiety symptoms hence worse outcome
Change in anxiety levelsBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionGeneralized Anxiety Stress Scale-7 (GAD-7), scores ranging from 0-21 with higher scores representing higher anxiety levels hence worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in self-esteemBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionRosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSE), scores ranging from 0-30 with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem
Change in mindfulnessBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionMindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), scores ranging from 1-6 with higher scores indicating higher mindful awareness
Change in functioningBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionRole Functioning Scale (RFS), scores ranging from 1-28 with higher scores representing better functioning
Change in social and occupational functioningBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionSocial and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better functioning
Change in quality of lifeBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-intervention12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better quality of life
Change in self-harmBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionSelf-harming behaviour, plans and thoughts, recording as binary response (0=No, 1=Yes)
Change in resilienceBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionConnor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher resilience
Change in future outlookBaseline, after 7 weeks of intervention/wait, and 1 month after post-interventionFuture Outlook Inventory (FOI), scores ranging from 1-70 with higher scores indicating greater degree of future consideration

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactEric Yu Hai Chen, FHKAM (Psychiatry)
eyhchen@hku.hk22554486
Backup ContactChristy Lai Ming Hui, PhD
christy@lmhui.com22554486

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026