Skip to content

Neurodynamic Sliding Verses Static Stretching

Comparison Of Neurodynamic Sliding Verses Static Stretching On Clinical Outcomes In People With Hamstring Tightness: A Randomized Control Trail

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05076825
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-10-13
Start date
2020-11-01
Completion date
2021-05-27
Last updated
2021-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Individuals With Hamstring Tightness

Brief summary

Hamstring muscle are more likely to shorten among all biarticular muscles of human body. One of the many factors of hamstring tightness is increased tension in the neural structure. Apart from routine stretching techniques, mobilization of nervous system proves to be more effective. There are lot of stretching techniques available but they are more effective after multiple sessions. This study aims to cater the problem of hamstring tightness by neural sliding and static stretching in minimum sessions and compare which technique is more effective in resolving the issue.

Detailed description

Randomized Controlled Trials was used to collect data. Total patients were selected in two group with each 31 subjects. Purposive sampling technique was used. Experimental group will receive routine physical therapy along with TENS, Hot pack and Neurodynamic Stretching. (For 30 seconds, 3 times per session for 3 alternative days a week & duration of 4 weeks). Outcome measure will be the hamstring tightness value angle in degrees, which will be obtained with the help of goniometer after performing active knee extension test and active straight leg raise test

Interventions

Participants supine with their cervical and thoracic spine supported in a forward flexed position. Simultaneous hip and knee flexion will be alternated dynamically with simultaneous hip and knee extension. The therapist will change the arrangement of movement depending on the tissue resistance level.

OTHERStatic Stretching

Participent lying supine, the therapist will passively position the subject into the straight leg raise position without discomfort or pain to the point where resistance to movement will be first felt.

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* People with age ranging between 25 and 35 years. * Hamstring tightness of twenty degrees * Incapability to reach seventy degree hip flexion in SLR.

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological or orthopedic diseases * Chronic or acute low back pain, Hamstring injury. * During last three month, involved in any lower extremity exercise programs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Hamstring flexibility assessed with Active Knee Extension TestBaseline, 2nd Week, 4th weekThis test is use to measure Hamstring tightness. 0 degree indicates more hamstring flexibility
Change from Baseline in Hamstring flexibility assessed with Straight Leg raiseBaseline, 2nd Week, 4th weekThis test is use to measure hamstring tightness. 90 degree indicates more hamstring flexibility

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026