Medical Education, Sepsis, Simulation Training
Conditions
Keywords
medical education, simulation training, sepsis, high-fidelity manikin, one-hour bundle sepsis
Brief summary
This study aimed to compare simulation training with conventional training (case-based discussion only) to improve team performance in implementing one-hour sepsis bundle in the intensive care unit
Detailed description
This was an experimental randomized single-blind study to examine the role of simulation-based training in improving team performance in conducting sepsis management. Subjects were sixteen doctors and twenty-four nurses working in the intensive care unit. The subjects were randomly divided into two treatment groups: the discussion group and the simulation group. Each treatment group was further divided into four small groups consisting of two doctors and three nurses. Prior to the training, every subject received a pretest for cognitive evaluation and a posttest at the end of the training. The performance of both groups in implementing one-hour sepsis bundle was assessed by solving a sepsis case in high fidelity manikin.
Interventions
OTHERSimulation training
The participants in the simulation group will receive simulation training with high-fidelity manikin to practice and implement one-hour bundle sepsis
OTHERCase-based discussion training
The participants in the conventional group will only do a case-based discussion in implementing one-hour bundle sepsis
Sponsors
Indonesia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Doctors working in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Public Hospital's ICU * Nurses working in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Public Hospital's ICU
Exclusion criteria
* Doctors and nurses who are not fit or healthy to undergo this training
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in score of skills in implementing one-hour bundle sepsis in the intensive care unit assessed with checklist which were designed by four anesthesiologist-intensivists | upon study completion, in 1 day | Measured by checklist which were designed by four anesthesiologist-intensivists before the study was conducted and validated by Aiken coefficient. The Aiken coefficient for this checklist were all \>0.3 which is declared valid. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in intrateam communication's score in implementing one hour sepsis bundle assessed with checklist which were designed by four anesthsiologist-intensivists | upon study completion, in 1 day | Measured by checklist which were designed by four anesthesiologist-intensivists before the study was conducted and validated by Aiken coefficient. The Aiken coefficient for this checklist were all \>0.3 which is declared valid. |
Countries
Indonesia
Outcome results
None listed