Skip to content

Irinotecan Liposome in Combination With 5-FU/LV Versus 5-FU/LV in Second-line Therapy for Gemcitabine-Refractory Pancreatic Cancer

A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dummy, Parallel-controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Study of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome in Combination With 5-FU/LV as Second-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer After Treatment Failure With Gemcitabine-based Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05074589
Enrollment
298
Registered
2021-10-12
Start date
2018-01-25
Completion date
2022-03-10
Last updated
2023-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Second-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer After Treatment Failure With Gemcitabine-based Therapy

Brief summary

To evaluate efficacy and safety of irinotecan hydrochloride liposome in combination with 5-FU/LV as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer after treatment failure with gemcitabine-based therapy.

Interventions

Irinotecan liposome、5-Fluorouracil、Leucovorin

DRUGPlacebo、5-Fluorouracil、Leucovorin

Placebo、5-Fluorouracil、Leucovorin

Sponsors

Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A randomized, double-blind, single-dummy, parallel-controlled, multicentre study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer; 2. Unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease ; 3. Documented disease progression after first-line treatment gemcitabine based therapy 4. ECOG: 0-1; 5. Adequate organ and bone marrow function; 6. sign an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Active CNS metastasis; 2. Uncontrolled tumor-related pain; 3. Clinically significant GI disorders; 4. Significant cardiovascular disease; 5. Active infection or uncontrolled fever; 6. Pregnant or breast feeding patients; 7. Allergic to a drug ingredient or component; 8. The investigators determined that other conditions were inappropriate for participation in this clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival(OS)The maximum time in follow up was approximately 12 monthsOS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, or censored at date last known alive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free SurvivalThe maximum time in follow up was 12 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression, or death (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cutoff date, whichever occurs first.
Objective Response RateAssessment every 6 weeks after initial response; maximum time on study 12 monthsObjective response rate was based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)
Time to Treatment FailureThe maximum time in follow up was 12 monthsTime from randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity or death.
Percentage of Patients With Tumor Marker (CA 19-9) ResponseBaseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 12 monthsResponse was defined as a decrease of 50% of CA19-9 in relation to the baseline level at least once during the treatment period.
Quality of life(QoL)Baseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 12 monthsQoL was based on EORTC-QLQ-C30

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026