Skip to content

Benefits of Assistive Listening Device for Speech Intelligibility

Benefits of an Assistive Listening Device for Speech Intelligibility in Noise

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05072470
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-10-11
Start date
2021-10-18
Completion date
2021-12-13
Last updated
2023-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Speech intelligibility in noise will be evaluated in adults with moderate to moderate-severe sensorineural hearing loss, using an assistive listening device and hearing aid, and compared to speech intelligibility in noise using hearing aids alone.

Interventions

DEVICERoger microphone

Commercially available transmitter microphone which sends distant speech signals to a receiver that is attached/embedded into hearing aids.

Commercially available receiver-in-canal hearing aid

Sponsors

Hearts for Hearing
CollaboratorOTHER
Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults age 18 or older with bilateral moderate to moderate severe sensorineural hearing loss, pure tone average must be between 40 and 69 dB HL (decibel Hearing Level) * experienced hearing aid users * symmetric hearing loss (no more than 15 dB difference between the ears at three contiguous frequencies) * good written and spoken English language skills * healthy outer ear as confirmed by otoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* contradictions to medical device noted upon otoscopy * known hypersensitivity or allergy to materials of investigational device or comparator * inability to produce reliable test results * known psychological problems * self reported symptoms of dizziness or vertigo

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech Intelligibility in NoiseDay 1 of a one day studyThe percent of correctly repeated words, when a list of 10 sentences is presented in noise. Ten sentences are presented at a certain loudness level while background noise is presented simultaneously at a specific loudness level. The number of words repeated correctly is calculated from the total number of words presented.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
Participants with bilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss Roger microphone: Commercially available transmitter microphone which sends distant speech signals to a receiver that is attached/embedded into hearing aids. Phonak Audeo hearing aid: Commercially available receiver-in-canal hearing aid
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous74 years
Bilateral Moderate to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Speech Intelligibility in Noise

The percent of correctly repeated words, when a list of 10 sentences is presented in noise. Ten sentences are presented at a certain loudness level while background noise is presented simultaneously at a specific loudness level. The number of words repeated correctly is calculated from the total number of words presented.

Time frame: Day 1 of a one day study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with hearing aid only at 0 dB SNR58 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 26
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with Roger system at 0 dB SNR80 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 20
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with hearing aid only at -5 dB SNR27 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 17
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with Roger system at -5 dB SNR50 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 23
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with hearing aid only at +5 dB SNR80 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 22
ExperimentalSpeech Intelligibility in NoisePercentage of words correctly repeated with Roger system at +5 dB SNR87 percentage of words correctly repeatedStandard Deviation 17
Comparison: Speech intelligibility will be better with hearing aids plus Roger device, than with hearing aids alone when tested using standardized speech test at 0 dB SNRp-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Speech intelligibility will be better with hearing aids plus Roger device, than with hearing aids alone when tested using standardized speech test at -5 dB SNRp-value: 0.031t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Speech intelligibility will be equal or better with hearing aids plus Roger device than with hearing aids alone when tested using standardized speech test at +5 dB SNR.p-value: 0.046t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026