Skip to content

Evidence of Myogenic Growth Factors in 3D Dynamic Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor

Dynamic Responsivity of Inguinal Hernia Scaffold ProFlor Attracts Myogenetic Growth Factors Finalizing the Regeneration of the Herniated Groin

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05072171
Acronym
HERNIA
Enrollment
15
Registered
2021-10-08
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Brief summary

The study utilizes the same tissue specimens gathered for previous investigations and removed from 15 patients already operated for inguinal hernia, who for different reasons needed additional surgery in the previously operated groin.

Detailed description

Among the individual of investigated the cohort, seven patients underwent groin revision for subsequent hydrocele, 4 for recurrence, and 4 for overlooked ipsilateral multiple hernia protrusions. Made from low weight, large porous polypropylene, ProFlor is composed of a multilamellar cylindrical 3D core, 15 mm thick, with 2 different longitudinal dimensions, 25 or 40 mm. The center of the implant core is connected on one surface to a flat mesh of different width depending on the dimension of the 3D core. This flat part of the device is intended to be deployed to counterface the peritoneal sheath. The 3D core of ProFlor ® is arranged to be compressible on both planes, longitudinal and transversal. Due to its proprietary centrifugal expansion, it can be positioned, fixation free, into the hernia defect for permanent obliteration. ProFlor owns an inherent dynamic responsivity as it contracts and relaxes in accord to the movements of the inguinal floor in which is positioned. The biopsies were excised from the anterior aspect of the 3D device. It should be noted that once deployed the anterior surface of ProFlor merely faces the external oblique fascia and has no contact with other structures of the groin. Therefore, corruption by host native tissue can be excluded. The biopsies were carried out in ten patients, three in the short term postop. between 3 and 5 weeks, five in the mid-term between 3 and 4 months postop., four in the long-term between 6 and 8 months postop. and the latter three in the extra-long term postop., more than three years after implantation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInguinal hernia repair with dynamic prosthesis

Tissue specimens excised at the above defined postoperative stages were fixed in neutral-buffered 10% formalin and routinely processed to paraffin wax. Sections (4 μm thick) were cut and stored at room temperature until use. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological analysis and Azan trichrome (Bioptica) staining to evaluate muscular tissue in the implant fabric.

Sponsors

University of Palermo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients already operated for inguinal hernia with ProFlor, who for different reasons needed additional surgery in the previously operated groin * ASA score \>4

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not underwent inguinal hernia repair with ProFlor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of NGF stained areas3-5 weeks postopevidence in ProFlor of NGF in the short term post implantation
assessment of NGFR p75 stained areas3-5 weeks postopevidence in ProFlor of NGFR p75 in the short term post implantation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026