Skip to content

VACuum-Assisted Closure for Necrotizing Soft Tissue infecTIONs

VACuum-Assisted Closure for Necrotizing Soft Tissue infecTIONs

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05071443
Acronym
VACATION
Enrollment
130
Registered
2021-10-08
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2021-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Necrotising Soft Tissue Infections

Keywords

Necrotising soft tissue infections, Necrotising fasciitis, Negative pressure wound therapy

Brief summary

Intro: Necrotizing and soft tissue infections (NSTI) are life-threatening bacterial infections characterized by subcutaneous tissue, fascia or muscle necrosis. The hospital mortality of NSTI is high, comprised between 20 and 30%. NSTIs represent the 4th cause of septic shock. Early management of NSTIs requires a coordinated and multidisciplinary approach, including broad-spectrum antibiotic administration, management of organ failures and aggressive surgical debridement with excision of all necrotic and infected tissues. NSTIs involve the lower limbs in about 70% of cases and lead in 15% of cases to limb amputation. During the early post-operative phase, daily wound care is required using conventional dressings. As soon as the infectious process is controlled, typically within 7 to 10 days of the initial debridement, the main goal of wound dressing is to allow for a granulation tissue to develop so that to perform a skin grafting. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), which consists in applying a negative pressure on the wound surface, may be used to this effect. A dedicated dressing is connected to a device that generates a negative pressure and collects exudates. NPWT may have a positive effect on wound healing by removing exudate, increasing regional perfusion and patient comfort and reducing infections. Beneficial effects of NPWT have been suggested by case series. However, no randomized controlled trial are currently available to adequately assess its efficiency and the 2014 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) on NSTI did not provide recommendations regarding NPWT use for managing NSTI wounds. The study's hypothesis is that in patients managed for NSTIs, NPWT: 1) may accelerate skin grafting and complete wound healing; and 2) improve functional outcomes.

Detailed description

Hypothesis/Objective: To demonstrate in patients who underwent a surgical debridement of the lower limb for NSTI a superiority of a wound dressing strategy using NPWT (intervention) as compared with conventional wound dressing on local healing (complete) and the recovery of walking. Method: Open-label randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the primary end point. Randomization in two arms: experimental group (NPWT) versus control group (conventional dressing) until skin grafting (decided by the attending surgeon).

Interventions

The therapeutic intervention being tested is the use of a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device. Several medical devices are currently being used and are based on the same principle. They involve applying negative pressure, generally between -100 and -150 mmHg, to a wound using a dressing (mostly a polyurethane foam dressing with hydrophobic pores), which hermetically covers the wound's surface and is connected to a container for collecting the fluids drained off. These devices are widely available and used to treat post-operative wounds. Duration of treatment: the use of NPWT will be maintained until the recovery of the skin has been achieved by the skin graft. An average duration of 3 weeks' treatment is expected in the intervention group.

Conventional dressings will be performed from randomization to skin grafting and applied every day based on the methods normally used in the participating centres, and also until the recovery of the skin has been achieved by the skin graft. This generally involves local care provided on a daily basis, ensuring gentle mechanical and chemical debridement by covering the wound with alginate type or other dressings, according to the condition of the wound. The methods used to apply these conventional dressings will be recorded.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This committee comprises experts (a dermatologist, a plastic surgeon, and a nurse specialized in wound care) tasked with validating in a consistent manner, blinded to the randomization arm, the aspect of the primary endpoint relating to cutaneous healing, based on standard photographs taken on a weekly basis by the clinical research nurse. Photographs will be made available to members of the adjudication committee through an online platform (Dispose AP-HP) or a digital support.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Written informed consent * NSTI/NF of the lower limb clinically suspected and confirmed by surgery with a first debridement performed since 5 days or more * Infection considered controlled (i.e., no more surgical debridement is necessary) * Last debridement performed at least 72 hours before * Affiliation to a social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Limited life expectancy * NPWT already initiated for the current NSTI/NF episode * 1st surgical debridement performed less than 5 days or more than 15 days before * High risk of bleeding (blood vessels exposed) * Local neoplasia * Risk of organ or peripheral nerve injury * Impossibility to set up a NPWT dressing hermetically * Limb amputation * Patient unable to walk without help * Women who are pregnant or are breast-feeding, or are of childbearing age and do not use or do not plan to use acceptable birth control measures * Patients under legal protection * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time elapsed between randomization and the onset of a combined outcome measure including a complete healing of the diseased limb and the recovery of walking.between Day 0 and 3 monthsComplete healing of the diseased limb is defined by more than 90% of functional skin covering the wound and Recovery of walking is defined by the ability to walk at least 100 steps, corresponding to approximately 30 meters, without help

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Form - 36at Day 0, 3 months and 6 months
Pain assessmentbetween Day 0 and 3 monthsPain assessment at each wound care by the patient (visual analogic scale), the nurse (behavioral pain scale) and quantification of morphine consumption (in morphine base equivalent): measured by the investigator at each wound care
Quantification of the number of anesthesia procedures (general anesthesia, sedation)between Day 0 and 6 months
Time elapsed between randomization and skin graftingbetween Day 0 and 6 months
Number of local superinfection episodesbetween Day 0 and 3 months
Quantification of the walking capacityat 3 months and 6 monthsmeasured over one week with a pedometer by the research nurse, at 3 and 6 months
Activities of Daily Living scoreat Day 0, 3 months and 6 months
Quantification of the time needed for each wound care before randomization and skin graftingbetween Day 0 and 6 monthsthis measure will be recorded once a week for one wound care
Need for stopping the NPWTbetween Day 0 and 3 months
Number of surgeries performed between randomization and skin graftingbetween Day 0 and 6 monthsAll surgeries will be recorded, including their date and indication
Number of surgeries performed after skin graftingbetween Day 0 and 6 monthsAll surgeries will be recorded, including their date and indication, all surgeries will be recorded, including their date and indication
Mortality assessedat 3 months and 6 months
Duration of hospital staybetween Day 0 and 6 months

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactNicolas DE PROST, MD, PhD
nicolas.de-prost@aphp.fr1 49 81 23 89
Backup ContactDavid SCHMITZ
david.schmitz@aphp.fr1 49 81 36 32

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026