Skip to content

Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalazia

Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Recurrent Chalazia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05070611
Enrollment
35
Registered
2021-10-07
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2021-11-01
Last updated
2021-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chalazion

Keywords

Chalazion, IPL, Meibomian gland function

Brief summary

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intense pulse light and meibomian glands expression in cases of recurrent chalazion after surgery.

Detailed description

We hypothesized that IPL application on the skin adjacent to eyelids after chalazion surgery will result in better meibomian gland function and lower recurrence. To date, it has not been previously reported the outcomes of the use of this technology for the management of chalazions recurrence. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intense pulse light and meibomian glands expression in cases of recurrent chalazion after surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEIPL-MGX

One week after lesion incision, the E-Eye machine (E-SWIN company, France) IPL treatment was administered to the skin area below the lower eyelid.13 Before treatment, the eyes were protected with opaque goggles and ultrasound gel was applied on the patient's face from tragus to tragus including the nose to conduct the light.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients had chronic unilateral recurrent chalazia that failed to resolve after conservative treatment that included warm compresses and antibiotic and steroid ophthalmic ointments.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) any intraocular inflammation, ocular infection, allergy, ocular surgery, or ocular trauma in the past 6 months; (2) any eyelid diseases or structural abnormality; (3) any systematic diseases may lead to dry eye or MGD; (4) skin cancer or pigmented lesion in the treatment zone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence rate of chalaziaan average of 1 yearThe recurrence rate of the recurrent chalazia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NITBUTan average of 1 yearnon-invasive tear film breakup time
meibomian expressibility and qualityan average of 1 yearThe expressibility and quality score of the meibum
TMHan average of 1 yeartear meniscus height

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactjin x ming
18344980413@qq.com13989455778
Backup Contactzhu y rui
zhuyirui001@126.com15868805518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026