Ulcerative Colitis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is expected to contribute to the body of real-world data of tofacitinib's safety and efficacy profile in ulcerative colitis. Conventional clinical outcomes will give a better understanding of response and remission rates in a representative, post-marketing population. Regular patient questionnaires and measurement of a biomarker of gut inflammation will provide detail on how patients experience induction treatment and contextualise the efficacy data.
Detailed description
This is a low-interventional study in which the intervention under study is home fecal calprotectin testing which falls outside of normal standard of care in ulcerative colitis. Tofacitinib is prescribed and administered as per the Swiss prescribing information. Accordingly, this study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as an interventional study. Under Swiss law, this study is considered and approved as a non-interventional study (Category A, Human Research Ordinance, Swiss Confederation).
Interventions
collection for measuring calprotectin levels
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female participants 18 years of age or older at screening visit * Participants with confirmed diagnosis of UC and who are prescribed tofacitinib (Xeljanz®) for moderately to severely active UC as per the Swiss label * Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, study interventions, and other study procedures * Capable of giving personally signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of clinical findings suggestive of Crohn's disease * Any previous exposure to tofacitinib including participation in the tofacitinib clinical program * Co-medication with any other advanced therapies for UC (biologics\*, azathioprine, mercaptopurine and methotrexate) or any other JAK inhibitor * Any identified contra-indications for use of tofacitinib as per the Swiss label * Not owning a handheld digital device compatible with the Sidekick Health App, not willing to have it installed on this device or not capable of using the App * Investigator site staff or Pfizer employees directly involved in the conduct of the study, site staff otherwise supervised by the investigator, and their respective family members.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 8 | Week 8 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the partial Mayo score (PMS) from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 16 | Week 16 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 16 | Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Remission at Week 16 | Week 16 | IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 8 | Week 8 | IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 16 | Week 16 | IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | Biochemical remission was defined as a fecal calprotectin (fCAL) concentration \<=250 micrograms per gram (mcg/g). fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 16 | Week 16 | Biochemical remission was defined as a fCAL concentration \<=250 mcg/g. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Measured by Mayo Score Stool Frequency Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The stool frequency patient reported outcome (PRO) was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Measured by Mayo Score Rectal Bleeding Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Urgency of Defecation Assessed Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Assessed Using Pain NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Sleep Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11 NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Daily Fatigue Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Weekly Fatigue Assessed Using FACIT-F at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - fatigue (FACIT-F) version (v)4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. |
| Median Change From Baseline in IBDQ Score (Total) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Median Change From Baseline in fCAL at Weeks 8 and 16 | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between stool frequency PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The mayo score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between urgency of defecation and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between abdominal pain and fCAL was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between quality of sleep and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between daily fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between weekly fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between IBDQ score and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation. |
| Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between stool frequency PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between urgency of defecation and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between abdominal pain and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between quality of sleep and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between daily fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between weekly fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and stool frequency PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and rectal bleeding PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and urgency of defecation was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and abdominal pain was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and quality of sleep was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and daily fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. |
| Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 8. |
| Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 16. |
| Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 8. |
| Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 16. |
| Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue | Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16 | Correlation between PMS and weekly fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. |
Countries
Switzerland
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who were prescribed tofacitinib in real world setting as routine clinical practice across Switzerland were enrolled in this study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| All Participants Participants with moderately to severely active UC who were prescribed tofacitinib by the treating physician in routine clinical practice as per the Swiss prescribing information, were included. | 18 |
| Total | 18 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Sponsor decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | All Participants | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41 Years | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 18 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 18 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 8
Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the partial Mayo score (PMS) from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 8 | 63 Percentage of participants |
Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between abdominal pain and fCAL was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | 0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score
Correlation between abdominal pain and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score | Baseline | -0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.9 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Abdominal Pain and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between daily fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score
Correlation between daily fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.8 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Baseline | 0 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Daily Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between IBDQ score and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | -0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between IBDQ Score and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain
Correlation between PMS and abdominal pain was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain | Baseline | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain | Week 8 | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Abdominal Pain | Week 16 | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue
Correlation between PMS and daily fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue | Baseline | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue | Week 8 | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Daily Fatigue | Week 16 | -0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between PMS and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | -0.8 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score
Correlation between PMS and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score | Baseline | -0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.8 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep
Correlation between PMS and quality of sleep was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep | Baseline | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep | Week 8 | -0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Quality of Sleep | Week 16 | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding
Correlation between PMS and rectal bleeding PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding | Baseline | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding | Week 8 | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Rectal Bleeding | Week 16 | 0.7 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency
Correlation between PMS and stool frequency PRO was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency | Baseline | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency | Week 8 | 0.8 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Stool Frequency | Week 16 | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation
Correlation between PMS and urgency of defecation was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation | Baseline | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation | Week 8 | 0.7 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Urgency of Defecation | Week 16 | 0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue
Correlation between PMS and weekly fatigue was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue | Baseline | -0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue | Week 8 | -0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between PMS and Weekly Fatigue | Week 16 | 0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between quality of sleep and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | 0 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | -0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score
Correlation between quality of sleep and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score | Baseline | 0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Quality of Sleep and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | 0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | -0.4 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score
Correlation between rectal bleeding PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score | Baseline | -0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Rectal Bleeding and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.6 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between stool frequency PRO and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The mayo score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | -0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score
Correlation between stool frequency PRO and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The stool frequency PRO was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score | Baseline | -0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Stool Frequency and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.7 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between urgency of defecation and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | -0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score
Correlation between urgency of defecation and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score | Baseline | -0.7 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | -0.9 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Urgency of Defecation and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | -0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration
Correlation between weekly fatigue and fCAL concentration was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Baseline | 0.2 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Week 8 | 0.5 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and fCAL Concentration | Week 16 | -0.9 Correlation Coefficient |
Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score
Correlation between weekly fatigue and IBDQ score was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the FACIT-F v4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Baseline | 0.3 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Week 8 | 0.7 Correlation Coefficient |
| All Participants | Correlations Between Weekly Fatigue and IBDQ Score | Week 16 | 0.1 Correlation Coefficient |
Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Assessed Using Pain NRS at Weeks 8 and 16
The abdominal pain was assessed with the pain NRS. Scoring was done on a 10-point horizontal NRS. Participant provided a score from 1 (none) to 10 (very severe). Higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Assessed Using Pain NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | -1 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Assessed Using Pain NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | -2 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Daily Fatigue Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16
The daily fatigue was assessed with the fatigue NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicated more severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Daily Fatigue Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | -1 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Daily Fatigue Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | -3 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in fCAL at Weeks 8 and 16
fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in fCAL at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | -44 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in fCAL at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | -24 micrograms per gram |
Median Change From Baseline in IBDQ Score (Total) at Weeks 8 and 16
The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in IBDQ Score (Total) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | 35 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in IBDQ Score (Total) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | 48 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Sleep Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16
The quality of sleep was assessed with a question from the sleep quality visual analogue scale survey. Scoring was done on a 11 NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (very bad) to 10 (great). Higher scores indicated better quality of sleep.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Sleep Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | 2 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Sleep Assessed Using NRS at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | 3 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Measured by Mayo Score Rectal Bleeding Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16
The rectal bleeding PRO was assessed with one question about most severe rectal bleeding on a given day. The Mayo Score rectal bleeding subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= no blood seen; 1= streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2= obvious blood with stool most of the time and 3= blood alone passes) where higher scores indicated more severe bleeding of the day.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Measured by Mayo Score Rectal Bleeding Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | 0 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Measured by Mayo Score Rectal Bleeding Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | 0 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Measured by Mayo Score Stool Frequency Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16
The stool frequency patient reported outcome (PRO) was assessed with one question about the number of stools on a given day. The Mayo Score stool frequency subscore was used for scoring. Scores ranged from 0 to 3 (0= normal number of stools; 1= 1-2 stools more than normal; 2= 3-4 stools more than normal and 3= 5 or more stools than normal) where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Measured by Mayo Score Stool Frequency Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | 0 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Measured by Mayo Score Stool Frequency Subscore at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | -1 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Urgency of Defecation Assessed Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 8 and 16
The urgency of defecation was assessed with the urgency NRS. Scoring was done on a 11-point NRS. Participant provided a score from 0 (no urgency) to 10 (worst possible urgency). Higher scores indicated more severe urgency.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Urgency of Defecation Assessed Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | -1 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Urgency of Defecation Assessed Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | -2 Score on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Weekly Fatigue Assessed Using FACIT-F at Weeks 8 and 16
The weekly fatigue was assessed with 13 questions from the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - fatigue (FACIT-F) version (v)4. Participants rated the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) for each 13 questions. Total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing lower fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Weekly Fatigue Assessed Using FACIT-F at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 8 | 12 Score on a scale |
| All Participants | Median Change From Baseline in Weekly Fatigue Assessed Using FACIT-F at Weeks 8 and 16 | Change at Week 16 | 13 Score on a scale |
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status
Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants with clinical remission at Week 16 | 612 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants with clinical remission at Week 16 | 586 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants with clinical remission at Week 16 | 1000 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants without clinical remission at Week 16 | 607 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants without clinical remission at Week 16 | 642 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants without clinical remission at Week 16 | 71 micrograms per gram |
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status
Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 16 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 16.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants with clinical response at Week 16 | 603 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants with clinical response at Week 16 | 586 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants with clinical response at Week 16 | 575 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants without clinical response at Week 16 | 706 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants without clinical response at Week 16 | 642 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 16 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants without clinical response at Week 16 | 331 micrograms per gram |
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status
Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. Partial mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical remission at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical remission at Week 8.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants with clinical remission at Week 8 | 590 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants with clinical remission at Week 8 | 466 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants with clinical remission at Week 8 | 788 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants without clinical remission at Week 8 | 622 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants without clinical remission at Week 8 | 586 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Remission Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants without clinical remission at Week 16 | 201 micrograms per gram |
Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status
Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity. In this outcome measure, fCAL concentration are reported at specified time points in those participants who had clinical response at Week 8 and in those participants who did not have clinical response at Week 8.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. All participants under Overall Number of Participants Analyzed contributed data to the table but may not have data evaluable for every row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants with clinical response at Week 8 | 501 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants with clinical response at Week 8 | 597 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants with clinical response at Week 8 | 331 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at baseline in participants without clinical response at Week 8 | 819 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 8 in participants without clinical response at Week 8 | 581 micrograms per gram |
| All Participants | Median fCAL Concentrations Over Time Stratified by Week 8 Clinical Response Status | fCAL concentrations at week 16 in participants without clinical response at Week 8 | 1000 micrograms per gram |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 16
Biochemical remission was defined as a fCAL concentration \<=250 mcg/g. fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 16 | 33 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 8
Biochemical remission was defined as a fecal calprotectin (fCAL) concentration \<=250 micrograms per gram (mcg/g). fCAL is a small anti-microbial protein detected in stool that constitutes approximately 60% of neutrophil cytoplasm. As migration of neutrophils into the intestinal mucosa is a hallmark of active intestinal inflammation, fCAL serves as a non-invasive biomarker for intestinal inflammation.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Biochemical Remission at Week 8 | 11 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 16
Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 16 | 40 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 8
Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 8 | 38 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 16
Clinical response was defined as a reduction in the PMS from baseline of \>=2 points or achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as PMS of \<= 2 with no subscore \>1. PMS consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician global assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (extreme severity). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 (normal) to 9 (extreme severity), where higher scores indicated more disease severity.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 16 | 73 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Remission at Week 16
IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Remission at Week 16 | 71 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 16
IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 16 | 100 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 8
IBDQ response was defined as an IBDQ score \>=16 points higher than IBDQ baseline score. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IBDQ Response at Week 8 | 69 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 8
IBDQ remission was defined as an IBDQ score \>= 170. The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire grouped into four dimensions: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, where range was as follows: bowel symptoms: 10 to 70; systemic symptoms: 5 to 35; emotional function: 12 to 84 and social function: 5 to 35. The total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224. For the total score and each domain, a higher score indicated better quality of life.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: FAS included all participants who were included in the study (i.e., performed baseline visit and received a study identification number). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission at Week 8 | 46 Percentage of participants |