Skip to content

CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 4

Comparison of Polymer-Free Cobalt-Chromium Thin Drug-Coated Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Prasugrel Monotherapy With Conventional 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05066789
Acronym
SMART-CHOICE4
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-10-04
Start date
2022-01-17
Completion date
2024-03-22
Last updated
2025-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Acute coronary syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, Drug eluting stent

Brief summary

This study is multi-center, open label, two-by-two factorial, randomized, noninferiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of polymer-free cobalt-chromium thin drug-coated stents (BioFreedom Ultra) with biodegradable polymer ultrathin sirolimus-eluting stents (Orsiro Mission) and prasugrel monotherapy after 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin plus prasugrel with 12-month DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Detailed description

Polymer is the key component of drug-eluting stents (DES) for facilitation of drug loading and control of drug release. However, durable polymer of the 1st generation DES has been considered to induce inflammation and to be associated with fatal complications such as very late stent thrombosis. To overcome this shortcoming, biodegradable polymer has been applied to the DES system. In several head-to-head comparison, ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents. As a result, Orsiro stent is considered one of the standard contemporary DESs. On the other hand, polymer-free drug-coated stents (DCS) have been developed as an alternative to durable and biodegradable polymer DES. The biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent is the representative polymer-free drug-coated stent and was superior to a bare-metal stent in patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, it failed to show noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months when compared with the ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent in an all-comers population, mainly due to increased target lesion revascularization (TLR). On top of possible insufficient or uncontrolled drug delivery at stented site due to absence of a drug carrier, thick strut (112 µm) and stainless steel alloy may explain a higher rate of TLR in the BioFreedom stent group compared with the Orsiro stent group. The BioFreedom Ultra stent is a novel cobalt-chromium thin stent (84 µm) with biolimus A9-coating. With advancement in stent alloy and strut thickness, treatment efficacy and safety of the BioFreedom Ultra stent would be comparable to the new version of Orsiro stent (Orsiro Mission) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES are currently recommended to use 12 months of DAPT, consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor. Although use of DAPT reduces ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, bleeding events increase in return. Hence, considering the aforementioned advancement of stent devices, shorter duration of DAPT and switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy would be possible. This has been demonstrated in several recent studies. However, although prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in lowering ischemic events, these studies mainly used ticagrelor as a solely used antiplatelet agent, and studies verifying the effect of prasugrel monotherapy after short duration of DAPT are limited to date. In addition, in these studies, DAPT was maintained for mostly at least 3 months in the ACS situation. With advancement of devices, duration of DAPT may be further reduced. In other words, prasugrel monotherapy after 1 month of DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel would be comparable to 12-month DAPT of aspirin plus prasugrel.

Interventions

DEVICEType of stent

1:1 randomization to biodegradable polymer DES (Orsiro Mission) and polymer-free DCS (Biofreedom)

DRUGDuration of DAPT

1:1 randomization to 1-month DAPT thereafter prasugrel monotherapy and 12-month DAPT (aspirin + prasugrel)

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

multi-center, open label, two-by-two factorial, randomized, noninferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject must be at least 19 years of age 2. Subject who is able to understand risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and sign informed consent voluntarily. 3. Patients presenting with ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction \[STEMI\], non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction \[NSTEMI\], or unstable angina) 4. Patients with at least one lesion with equal or greater than 50% diameter stenosis requiring treatment with drug-eluting stents (DES) in native coronary artery or graft

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients unable to provide consent 2. Patients with known intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, or major components of drug-eluting stents 3. Patients who have non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) 4. Patients who need chronic anti-coagulation therapy 5. Patients with active pathological bleeding 6. Pregnant or lactating women Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent Comparison Study: target-lesion failure (TLF)1 yeara composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: net adverse clinical events (NACE)1 yeara composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and clinically relevant bleeding

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: MACCE1 yeara composite of all-cause death, MI, and stroke
Stent Comparison Study: TLF3 yearsa composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Stent Comparison Study: target-vessel failure1 and 3 yearsa composite of cardiac death, target vessel-MI, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization by percutaneous or surgical methods
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death1 and 3 yearscardiac death
Stent Comparison Study: target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI)1 and 3 yearstarget-vessel MI
Stent Comparison Study: clinically indicated TLR1 and 3 yearsclinically indicated TLR
Stent Comparison Study: stent thrombosis1 and 3 yearsdefinite or probable by Academic Research Consortium \[ARC\] definition
Stent Comparison Study: clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR)1 and 3 yearsclinically indicated target-vessel revascularization (TVR)
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death or MI1 and 3 yearscardiac death or MI
Stent Comparison Study: cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis1 and 3 yearscardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
Stent Comparison Study: all-cause death1 and 3 yearsall-cause death
Stent Comparison Study: MI1 and 3 yearsMI
Stent Comparison Study: restricted mean survival time for the TLF1 and 3 yearsrestricted mean survival time for the TLF
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: clinically relevant bleeding1 yearbleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: all-cause death1 yearall-cause death
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: MI1 yearMI
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: stroke1 yearstroke
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death1 yearcardiac death
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: stent thrombosis1 yeardefinite or probable by ARC definition
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: all-cause death or MI1 yearall-cause death or MI
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death or MI1 yearcardiac death or MI
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis1 yearcardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding1 yearBARC type 3 or 5 bleeding
Antiplatelet Comparison Study: restricted mean survival time for the NACE1 yearrestricted mean survival time for the NACE
Stent Comparison Study: all-cause death or MI1 and 3 yearsall-cause death or MI
Stent Comparison Study: any revascularization1 and 3 yearsany revascularization

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026