Skip to content

What Makes People Better at Retrieving Difficult Words?

What Makes People Better at Retrieving Difficult Words?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05066750
Enrollment
170
Registered
2021-10-04
Start date
2021-08-23
Completion date
2022-11-01
Last updated
2024-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Aging

Keywords

mindful breathing, anxiety, word retrieval

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce words in response to definitions. Participants will watch a video, then see definitions and try to come up with a word that fits each one. Participants will also complete some surveys and other measures. Collected data will give researchers a better understanding of how individuals' personality and cognitive traits and setting in which word retrieval occurs relate to the ability to produce individual words.

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to produce words in response to definitions. Adult participants ages 18-30 and 65-80 will participate in videoconference calls during which a video is shown and definitions are presented. Participants will try to come up with a word that fits each definition, and then complete some surveys, including some about anxiety, mindfulness, attention, vocabulary, and demographics. Participation will take approximately 1.25 hours. Collected data will be de-identified, and the aggregate data will give researchers a better understanding of how individuals' personality and cognitive traits and setting in which word retrieval occurs relate to peoples' ability to produce individual words.

Interventions

Participants watch a 10 minute mindful breathing video

BEHAVIORALControl video

Participants watch a 10 minute control video

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants in each condition do not know what other participants are doing, nor that there is another condition.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to one of two behavioral intervention conditions before performing a word retrieval task

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* fluent speakers of English ages 18-30 or ages 65-80

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Word Retrieval PerformanceDuring the 1.25 hour experimental sessionPercent of trials with correct responses and percent of trials that are word retrieval failures will be measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants will try to provide words that best fit definitions, indicating when a word gets stuck on the tip of their tongue.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mindful Breathing Video
Participants watch a 10 minute mindful breathing video Mindful breathing: Participants watch a 10 minute mindful breathing video
85
Control Video
Participants watch a 10 minute control video Control video: Participants watch a 10 minute control video
85
Total170

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMindful Breathing VideoControl VideoTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
43 Participants42 Participants85 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants43 Participants85 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
74 Participants71 Participants145 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
85 participants85 participants170 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants62 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants23 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 850 / 85
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 850 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 850 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Word Retrieval Performance

Percent of trials with correct responses and percent of trials that are word retrieval failures will be measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants will try to provide words that best fit definitions, indicating when a word gets stuck on the tip of their tongue.

Time frame: During the 1.25 hour experimental session

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing VideoWord Retrieval PerformancePercent correct41 PercentStandard Deviation 19
Mindful Breathing VideoWord Retrieval PerformancePercent TOTs11 PercentStandard Deviation 7
Control VideoWord Retrieval PerformancePercent correct37 PercentStandard Deviation 18
Control VideoWord Retrieval PerformancePercent TOTs11 PercentStandard Deviation 7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026