Skip to content

Evaluation of Different Teaching- and Learningmethods

Evaluation of Different Teaching- and Learningmethods Concerning the Humeral Intraosseal Access in Inexperienced Providers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05066204
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-10-04
Start date
2021-05-17
Completion date
2022-03-29
Last updated
2022-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication of Infusion, Education, Medical

Brief summary

Due to the corona pandemia and the consecutive reduction of teaching students face to face the imparting of medical skills is limited. Video sequences may be an adequate alternative to educate selected practical skills. The investigators explored this aspect in spring 2021 concerning the humeral intraosseous access. This study was registered under ClinicalTrials: NCT04842357. Data is still under statistical analysis and not published yet. As a secondary endpoint we found participant having done self-study first and watched a teaching-video one week later performed better than participant in the vice versa sequence. This may have important curricular implications. So, we launch the present study to investigate, if the sequence: Self-Study, then Teaching-Video is more efficient than vice versa.

Detailed description

The investigators will recruit last year medical students and randomise them into two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A will watch a standardised video about the skill, then directly do self-study. Group B will do self-study and then directly watch a standardised video. Right after this, both groups will be video recorded during the performance of the skill: humeral intraosseous access on a simulator. The performance will be quantified by a scale by two investigators

Interventions

OTHERSequence of teaching-/learningmethod

see: arm/group descriptions

Sponsors

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Investigator are blinded/masked against the study arm of the particular assessed participant.

Intervention model description

Two unbound samples running through a different sequence of teching-/learningmethods

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* voluteer medical students in their last year of medical school (i.e. after 2nd state board in Germany) * writen informed consert

Exclusion criteria

* denial of participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sum of score1 Daysum of the score used to evaluate the particpants' performance by video records

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026