Skip to content

Pectus ESC Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Study

Pragmatic Study Comparing Outcomes of Multimodal Epidural and Erector Spinae Catheter Pain Protocols After Pectus Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05063695
Acronym
PectusESC
Enrollment
220
Registered
2021-10-01
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative, Pectus Excavatum

Brief summary

Investigators hypothesize that Erector spinae catheter pain management protocol would allow patients to have earlier and more effective rehabilitation with decreased length of hospital stay. The aims are to compare LOS between the two groups (epidural and ES groups). Secondary aims are to compare recovery outcomes (mobilization time), time required to do the blocks, pain scores and opioid use during hospitalization and on follow up after discharge until Pain clinic visit, side effects, family satisfaction and readmissions among the two groups. In addition, in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes in subjects who received ESP protocol will be studied.

Detailed description

Retrospective study - Electronic medical records of consecutive patients who underwent pectus surgery between January and December of 2019 (epidural protocol) and those who underwent same procedure between June 2020 to May 2021, will be evaluated. Covariates and outcomes described in sections below will be recorded from EMR. The data included records from flowsheets, pain team notes based on follow up questionnaires administered by phone after discharge until after ESP catheters were removed, as well as pain clinic notes.

Interventions

OTHERMultimodal Erector spinae catheter protocol

Patients either received multimodal epidural or ESP protocol

Sponsors

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age\>8 years * Diagnosis of pectus excavatum who underwent Nuss procedure * Pain regimen included either epidural catheter or ES catheters

Exclusion criteria

* Developmental delay * prior pectus repair * concomitant procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of stayUpto 10 days after surgeryDate of surgery to hospital discharge
MobilizationAfter surgery in-hospital, phone calls until POD6, pain clinic and surgery clinic postop visit (within 4 weeks after surgery)Meeting PT goals

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain measuresAfter surgery in-hospital, phone calls until POD6, pain clinic and surgery clinic postop visit (within 4 weeks after surgery)Pain scores postoperative and opioid/benzodiazepine use
Side effectsAfter surgery in-hospital, phone calls until POD6, pain clinic and surgery clinic postop visit (within 4 weeks after surgery)ED visit, readmission, numbness, infection, LA toxicity etc.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026