Skip to content

Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair: Post-operative Syndesmotic Volumes.

Internal Brace Augmented Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair and Its Post-operative Effects on Syndesmotic Volumes: A Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05062265
Enrollment
23
Registered
2021-09-30
Start date
2022-01-31
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bimalleolar Fractures, Ligament Rupture, Syndesmotic Injuries, Trimalleolar Fractures

Brief summary

Over the course of a year from the start of the research study, twenty subjects will be randomized evenly into one of two groups after an informed consent is obtained: a traditional tight rope fixation group or a tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace group. Postoperative reduction was assessed by 3D volumetric ratios and measured by weight-bearing CT at 6-weeks and 3-months post-operation. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively, and at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 1-year post-operation and included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) . Differences in volumetric ratios and PROs were evaluated between groups and time periods.

Interventions

DEVICETight rope fixation

a traditional tight rope fixation is performed on one randomized set of subjects

DEVICETight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace

A tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace set of subjects to compare syndesmotic volume

Sponsors

Arthrex, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Vann Virginia Center for Orthopaedics dba Atlantic Orthopaedic Specialists
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients who fit the study injury list

Exclusion criteria

* smokers * prior surgery on ankle * bi-lateral surgery * recent participation in another study within the last 90days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio6-Weeks Post-opuse of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary Scores6 weeks post-operativeThe RAND-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
RAND-36 Summary Scores3 months post-operativeThe Short Form-36 (SF-36 or RAND-36) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)6 weeks post-operativeFAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Excluded (n = 2) \- Not meeting inclusion criteria: Intact AITFL (n = 2)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tight Rope Fixation
Tight rope fixation: a traditional tight rope fixation is performed on one randomized set of subjects
11
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal Brace
Tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace: A tight rope fixation with an anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) repair augmentation with an internal brace
9
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTight Rope FixationTight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceTotal
Age, Continuous50.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.3
52.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
FAOS- Daily Life19 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
FAOS- Pain20.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2
30.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
FAOS- QoL6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
FAOS- Sports/Rec7.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
6.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
FAOS- Symptoms26.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.9
40.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
Height (m)1.6 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.7 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
1.7 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Operative Side
Left
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Operative Side
Right
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
RAND-36 MHC46.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
51.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
48.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
RAND-36 PHC37.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
39.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
38.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Weight (kg)85.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
81.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
83.3 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 121 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio

use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle

Time frame: 6-Weeks Post-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tight Rope FixationSyndesmotic Volumetric Ratio1.2 Volumetric RatioStandard Deviation 0.2
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceSyndesmotic Volumetric Ratio1.1 Volumetric RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Primary

Syndesmotic Volumetric Ratio

use of weight-bearing CT scan to measure; In order to compare the 3D syndesmotic volume between groups, the volume ratio was calculated for each patient by dividing the syndesmotic volume of the operative ankle by the syndesmotic volume of the contralateral uninjured ankle

Time frame: 3 months post-operative volume

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tight Rope FixationSyndesmotic Volumetric Ratio1.2 Volumetric RatioStandard Deviation 0.3
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceSyndesmotic Volumetric Ratio1.1 Volumetric RatioStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary Scores

The RAND-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.

Time frame: 6 weeks post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope Fixation36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary ScoresPHC35.2 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary ScoresMHC45.3 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal Brace36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary ScoresPHC36.3 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal Brace36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (RAND-36) Summary ScoresMHC47.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 1 year post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms73.6 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec63.2 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life87.1 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL63.2 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain80.5 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL73.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain87 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms80.3 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life90.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec77.2 units on a scale
Secondary

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 6 weeks post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain53.1 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms56.4 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life60.5 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec17.3 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL29.5 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life72.6 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain71.6 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL38.3 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms69.6 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec42.8 units on a scale
Secondary

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain70.7 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms69.1 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life80 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec46.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL46.3 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec55.6 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain74.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL41.2 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life78 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms69.6 units on a scale
Secondary

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 6 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms62 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec45 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life75.1 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL46.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope FixationFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain70 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)QoL64 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Pain82.8 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Symptoms80.1 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Daily Life89.3 units on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceFoot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Sports/Rec72.8 units on a scale
Secondary

RAND-36 Summary Scores

The Short Form-36 (SF-36 or RAND-36) is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC50.7 score on a scale
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC52.2 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC44.5 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC52.8 score on a scale
Secondary

RAND-36 Summary Scores

The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.

Time frame: 6 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC48.5 score on a scale
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC51.3 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC51.9 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC55.8 score on a scale
Secondary

RAND-36 Summary Scores

The SF-36 is a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire consisting of 36 questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Scores are 00-100. Higher scores equate to better quality of life and inverse for lower scores. The Physical Health Component and Mental Health Component summary scores were calculated using the oblique method to reduce the risk of underrepresenting mental health scores.

Time frame: 1 year post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC49.7 score on a scale
Tight Rope FixationRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC53.3 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresPHC51 score on a scale
Tight Rope Fixation w/ AITFL Repair Augmentation With an Internal BraceRAND-36 Summary ScoresMHC54.9 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026