Skip to content

Impact of Pacing Output and Cycle Length on QRS Morphology

Impact of Pacing Output and Cycle Length on QRS Morphology in Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05061498
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
2021-12-01
Completion date
2022-11-01
Last updated
2021-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Ablation, PVC - Premature Ventricular Complex

Keywords

Catheter ablation of PVC, Pacemapping

Brief summary

Current recommendations for pacemapping are based on expert opinion and animals models. Present study sought to evaluate the influence of different parameters of pacemapping on QRS morphology. Pacemapping is performed with different cycle length (fixed burst vs. coupling interval) and stimulation output (maximum output vs. threshold) and resulting QRS complexes are compared to clinical PVC and the standard of care to determine the optimal parameter setting in pacemapping.

Detailed description

Pacemapping is a common technique to determine to origin of ventricular ectopy during catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC). During the pacemapping process an electrical pacing stimulus is applied via the ablation catheter and the resulting QRS complex is compared the clinical target PVC. The higher the consistency between the stimulated QRS complex and the clinical PVC, the nearer the catheter is located to the origin of ectopy. Current recommendations for the execution of pacemapping are based on expert opinion and animals models. The investigators sought to assess for the first time in a clinical real life setting the different parameters for pacemapping (i.e. Cycle length and stimulation output). Therefore during the pacemapping process in routine PVC ablation pacing is performed with different cycle length (fixed burst vs. coupling interval of PVC) and different electrical output (maximum output vs. stimulation threshold). The resulting QRS morphologies are on the one hand compared to the ablation target (clinical PVC) and on the other hand to the suggest standard of care (Coupling interval at pacing threshold) to determine the optimal setting of parameters in pacemapping.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAdditional Pacing maneuvers

In order to determine the optimal setting for pacemapping in all participants additional pacing maneuvers (output and cycle length) are performed

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Köln
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients undergoing PVC ablation

Exclusion criteria

* patients \<18 years * patients not able to consent * pregnancy * contraindication for PVC ablation * unavailability of vascular access * patients with complex congenital heart disease * expected hemodynamical instability during pacemapping

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Template Matching with clinical PVCImmediately during PVC ablation. No follow up intended.Different pacing settings are applied in order to determine the optimal Consistency between paced QRS complex and clinical PVC

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactJan-Hendrik van den Bruck, MD
jan-hendrik.van-den-bruck@uk-koeln.de+49 22147884895
Backup ContactJakob Lüker, MD
jakob.lueker@uk-koeln.de+49 221 478 82851

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026