Skip to content

Gripwise® Versus JAMAR®

Comparison of Gripstrength Assessment Between the Gripwise® and JAMAR® Dynamometers in Elderly Inpatients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05060874
Acronym
HANDGAGES
Enrollment
348
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
2021-11-18
Last updated
2021-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-Related Sarcopenia

Keywords

aged, inpatients, hand strength

Brief summary

It is recommended to screen ageing patients for sarcopenia, due to the increased risk of morbimortality if detected positive. According to the consensus of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, the diagnosis of sarcopenia is based, among other things, on grip strength measurement. Our study will compare the performance of the new GRIPWISE digital device with the mechanical dynamometer JAMAR, the gold standard currently used to assess the grip strength. We propose to evaluate it in an elderly hospitalized population where the prevalence of sarcopenia is likely to be high due to the high prevalence of various chronic illness, notably oncological and cardiological ones. This cross-sectional study will include 348 patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* men and women aged 65 or over * affiliated to a health insurance * Francophone.

Exclusion criteria

* \- refusal to participate * unable to communicate * unable to use both hands (dominant and non-dominant)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison between Jamar® and Gripwise® values for grip strength measurementday1Intra-class correlation between the best values obtained with each device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparison according to the patient's positionday1correlations of dynamometer measurements between patients assessed in the sitting or lying position
number of attempt to reach the maximum valueday1Comparison of the three measurements obtained for each patient with each device
factors influencing detected weaknessday1significant difference in the rate of women detected as weak with a handgrip \<16kg and men \<27kg, between the different reasons for hospitalisation, the number of days of hospitalisation, and between the different chronic cancerous and non-cancerous pathologies (Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index), the age groups 65-79 years and ≥80 years
satisfaction using the devicesday1rate of patients finding one of both device easier to use

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026