Skip to content

Iron Supplementation in Upper Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose Versus Oral Ferrous Sulfate Replacement in Anaemia Due to Acute Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding (FIERCE): Protocol of a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05060731
Acronym
FIERCE
Enrollment
570
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2028-02-01
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, GastroIntestinal Bleeding

Keywords

non-variceal upper gastrointersinal bleeding, iron supplementation, intravenous iron

Brief summary

Anemia is a frequent complication of gastrointestinal bleeding, affecting 61% of the patients. Currently, anemia caused by gastrointestinal bleeding can be treated with iron supplementation. However, the dose and route of the administration are still a question. The FIERCE clinical trial aims to compare the effect of intravenous iron supplementation and oral iron replacement on mortality, unplanned emergency visits, and hospital readmissions in multimorbid patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding.

Detailed description

In gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common complication, affecting more than 60% of the patients. There are two pillars of the treatment of acute GIB. First, the bleeding point needs identification and endoscopic treatment. Second, the resulting hypovolemia and anemia require fluid resuscitation, transfusion, and replacement of the lost iron. There are two simple ways to manage IDA after acute GIB. Patients either have intravenous (IV) iron infusions one to six times as part of their hospital treatment or receive three months of oral iron supplementation. There is a gap in current guidelines on which approach clinicians should choose. Here the investigators plan a multicentric, two-arm, randomized controlled trial, to compare the efficacy of oral and intravenous iron supplementation in multimorbid patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Group A will receive one dose of 1000 mg of IV ferric carboxymaltose on the day of randomization, while iron supplementation for group B will be performed with one ferrous sulfate tablet every day (ca. 200-300 mg) for three months. The primary outcome will be the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, unplanned emergency visit, and unplanned hospital readmission within six months after enrollment. In the first phase, the investigators plan to recruit 15 patients on each arm to assess the proportion of the primary outcome in the two groups. In the second phase, a sample size calculation for the primary outcome will be performed based on the results of the first phase.

Interventions

Ca. 200-300 mg of ferrous sulfate will be administered orally every day for 3 months.

DRUGIntravenous iron supplementation

One dose of intravenous 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose will be administered on the day of randomization.

Sponsors

University of Pecs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The investigators plan to recruit 285 patients on each arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age ≥ 65 years; 2. endoscopically proven acute nonvariceal GIB source; 3. 48 hours after the endoscopic diagnosis and/or treatment; 4. hemodynamically stable; 5. the discharge of the patient is planned; 6. hemoglobin level \<10 g/dl on the day of randomisation; 7. 24 hours after the last transfusion and no need for further transfusion; 8. signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. known hypersensitivity to iron products (mild side effects excluded); 2. previous diagnosis of iron overload \[e.g., transferrin receptor saturation (TSAT) \>50%, ferritin\> 160 for women ng/ml, ferritin \>270 ng/ml for men) or disorders of iron utilisation; 3. pregnancy or breast feeding; 4. diagnosis of iron malabsorption (at discretion of the attending clinician; e.g., severe inflammatory bowel disease, active celiac disease); 5. chronic end stage diseases (chronic heart failure-New York Heart Association Classification class 4, chronic kidney disease (eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) with or without dialysis, liver cirrhosis with Child Pugh C score, chronic kidney disease with dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage 4, chronic inflammatory disease, malignancies, AIDS); 6. active malignancies; 7. liver cirrhosis with known varices at high risk of bleeding - endoscopic features of high risk of variceal bleeding or liver stiffness measured by transient elastography \>20 kiloPascal and platelet count \<150 × 10\^9 cells/L; 8. gastrointestinal tract malignancies with high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding; 9. high risk of poor compliance or no fixed abode; 10. myelo- or lymphoproliferative diseases; 11. anemia not attributable to iron deficiency (sideroblastic anaemia, aplastic anaemia, haemolytic anaemia, thalassaemia, B12 vitamin or folic acid deficiency or combination of these with IDA); 12. primary coagulation disorders (e.g. Glanzmann thrombasthenia, Von Willebrand disease, Haemophylia A, Haemophylia B); 13. the patient will be transferred to another institute after discharge (e.g. hospital, senior care center); 14. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status \>2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite outcome3 monthsThe composite endpoint includes all-cause mortality, unplanned emergency visit (general practitioner or emergency outpatient clinic), and unplanned hospital admission for any reason. The investigators will calculate the proportion of the outcome in each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned emergency visits1, and 3 monthsEmergency visit from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of unplanned emergency visits.
Unplanned hospital admission1, and 3 monthsHospital admission from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of unplanned admission.
Quality of life using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysChanges in quality of life measured with the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire compared to baseline.
Quality of life using the EuroQol five-dimensions - 5 levels questionnare1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysChanges in quality of life measured with the EuroQol five-dimensions - 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire compared to baseline.
Gait speed1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysChanges in gait speed compared to baseline. Gait speed will be evaluated on a 4-meter flat walking path.
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysChanges in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) compared to baseline.
Handgrip strength1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysChanges in handgrip strength compared to baseline.
Normalization of the haemoglobin level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysThe percentage of participants with Hb levels of ≥12 g/dL in women and ≥13 g/d, compared to baseline.
Change in Hb level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in Hb level.
Change in haematocrit1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in haematocrit.
Change in serum iron level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in serum iron level.
Change in serum transferrin level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in serum transferrin level.
All-cause mortality1, and 3 monthsDeath from any cause. The proportion of the outcome will be calculated in each arm and compared between the arms. The investigators will compare subgroups of patients based on the cause of mortality.
Change in soluble transferrin receptor concentration1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) concentration.
Change in ferritin level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in ferritin level.
Change in the number of reticulocytes1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in the number of reticulocytes.
Change in the number of erythrocytes1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in the number of erythrocytes.
Change in the total iron-binding capacity1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in the total iron-binding capacity (TIBC).
Change in erythropoietin level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in erythropoietin level.
Change in C-reactive protein level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in the C-reactive protein level.
Change in hepcidin level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in hepcidin level.
Change in phosphate level1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in phosphate level.
Discontinuation of the treatment due to adverse events1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysThe percentage of discontinuation in the two arms.
Cost-effectiveness1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): incremental costs divided by incremental effectiveness .
Change in transferrin saturation1, and 3 months +/- 7 daysAbsolute change from baseline to follow-up in transferrin saturation.

Countries

Hungary

Contacts

Primary ContactBálint Erőss, MD, PhD
eross.balint@pte.hu+3630/887-4028
Backup ContactPéter Hegyi, MD, PhD, DSc, MAE
p.hegyi@tm-centre.org+3670/375-1031

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026