Skip to content

Long-Term Follow-Up Study of AAV2hAQP1 for Radiation Induced Xerostomia

Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Participants Enrolled in the MGT016 Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of AAV2hAQP1 for Radiation-Induced Parotid Gland Hypofunction and Xerostomia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05060341
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
2020-11-12
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radiation-induced Xerostomia

Brief summary

This study is a long-term follow-up study for patients who have been administered AAV2hAQP1 in the Phase 1 Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Optimal Dose, Safety, and Activity in Subjects with Radiation Induced Parotid Gland Hypofunction and Xerostomia

Detailed description

This clinical trial is designed to assess the long-term safety and activity of intra-parotid administration of AAV2hAQP1 in subjects with radiation-induced parotid salivary hypofunction and xerostomia. After completion of their Month 12 Follow-Up visit in Study MGT016, subjects will be invited to enroll in this 4-year follow-up study during which they will be assessed for up to 60 months following study drug administration. This follow-up trial is a non-interventional study designed to collect data on longer-term safety and activity at 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months following study drug administration. Over the course of the study, subjects will undergo physical and oral examinations; vital sign measurements; weight measurements; AE assessments; concurrent medication assessments; sample blood collection for hematology and chemistry; urinalysis; ear, nose, and throat (ENT) screening for malignancy; imaging assessments (if indicated); salivary flow assessments; and questionnaire assessments.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

MeiraGTx, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 81 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Are willing and able to provide informed consent 2. Received AAV2hAQP1 administered via Stensen's duct to a single or both parotid glands in the prior open-label, Phase 1, dose-escalation study (Study MGT016) 3. Are willing and able to adhere to the protocol and long-term follow-up

Exclusion criteria

1\. Subjects unwilling or unable to meet with the requirements of the study will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
• Incidence of AEs, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and SAEs4 yearsSafety

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in saliva flow compared to baseline.4 yearsChanges in unstimulated and stimulated salivary output (mL/minute) of the treated parotid gland and/or whole saliva output as compared to baseline.
Changes in the McMaster Global Rate of Change relative to Baseline4 yearsThis first part of this questionnaire asks the patient to evaluate their Dry Mouth relative to before treatment as better, worse, or the same. If better or worse, the patient is asked to rate the magnitude of change, on a scale of 1-7, with a higher score being a better outcome. This first part of this questionnaire asks the patient to evaluate how limited they are in daily activities due to dry mouth, relative to before treatment as better, worse, or the same. If better or worse, the patient is asked to rate the magnitude of change, on a scale of 1-7, with a higher score being a better outcome.
Changes in the Xerostomia Questionnaire relative to Baseline4 yearsThe XQ is a series of 8 questions designed to assess the degree of xerostomia symptoms. Each question is a scale of 1-10, with high values indicating worse xerostomia.
Changes in the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck4 yearsThe MDASI-HN is a questionnaire consisting of 28 questions designed to assess the degree of xerostomia symptoms. Each question is a scale of 1-10, with high values indicating worse xerostomia.

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026