Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Spasticity, Motor function
Brief summary
Due to minimal volitional activation of the impaired arm, these individuals are less able to engage in activities of daily living (ADL's). Moreover, simultaneous use of the hand and arm are needed throughout ADL's. The effects of these two approaches (circuit class training and individual task-specific training) on upper extremity function and activities of daily living (ADL's) have not yet been clearly identified, and studies on its effects on chronic stroke patients are limited.
Detailed description
several research found that circuit training improved various functional parameters after stroke. And most of the circuit based tasks from the published studies were focused on the leg strength, walking speed, distance and balance etc. Previous literature found that circuit class training is effective in improving upper extremity function in chronic stroke patients disregarding the type of stroke and the results of that study are not generalized for chronic stroke patients with upper extremity deficit. Secondly, circuit class training and task-specific training are effective for improving upper limb function following a stroke but in the acute stage. In fact, there is no evidence in which comparison of these two approaches has been done in chronic stroke patients and thirdly, between these two approaches which approach is more effective towards improving upper limb function in chronic stage.
Interventions
OTHERCircuit Class Training
Station 1 will include tasks for warm-up specific for upper extremity, station 2 will include shoulder exercises, station 3 will include elbow exercises, station 4 will include wrist exercises and station 5 will include hand activities and functional training. Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.
OTHERIndividual Task specific training
Variables such as speed, or/and resistance will progressively increase in difficulty according to each patient's ability.
Sponsors
Riphah International University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Mini-Mental State Examination score more than 24 * Chronic stage (i.e. post-stroke duration of 6 months) * Single episode of stroke * MAS of 1 to 3 at upper extremity. * MRS of ≤ 3 at lower extremity. * MCA stroke * Scores 32 to 47 on Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FMA-UE)
Exclusion criteria
* Orthopedic conditions that affect the UE function. * Other neurological conditions, like PD, MS etc.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale | 8 weeks | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is the gold standard to assess motor function of post-stroke hemiparesis. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FMUE) Scale is a widely used and highly recommended stroke-specific, performance-based measure of impairment. It is designed to assess reflex activity, movement control and muscle strength in the upper extremity of people with post-stroke hemiplegia. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Ashworth Scale | 8 weeks | The modified Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone. The modified Ashworth scale is a muscle tone assessment scale used to assess the resistance experienced during passive range of motion, which does not require any instrumentation and is quick to perform |
| Stroke Specific-Quality of Life Urdu Version (SS-QOL) | 8 weeks | The SS-QOL scale is a health-related outcome measure that comprises 49 items in 12 areas of vision, mobility, thinking, social roles, self-care, language, personality, family roles, work/productivity, upper limb function, mood and energy. It covers a more extensive inclusion of capacities ordinarily influenced by stroke. |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed