Skip to content

Inspiratory Muscle Training and Behavioral Support to Alleviate Dyspnea and Promote Walking in Lung Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study

Tele-rehabilitation Following Curative Intent Therapy of Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05059132
Enrollment
31
Registered
2021-09-28
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasm

Keywords

Pilot study, Tele-rehabilitation, Remote rehabilitation, Exercise therapy, Aerobic exercise, Physical activity

Brief summary

This is a pilot randomized study to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of a novel tele-rehabilitation intervention for stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy. The specific aims and hypotheses are: Specific Aim 1: Conduct a pilot, phase IIb, parallel randomized (1:1) study to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of inspiratory muscle training and behavioral support to promote walking in tele-rehabilitation with stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy (N=40). Hypothesis 1a: ≥ 20% eligible patients will enroll; ≥75% of participants will achieve ≥75% adherence to the tele-rehabilitation program. Hypothesis 1b: ≥75% of participants will perceive tele-rehabilitation as acceptable (Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire ≥4). There will be 0 intervention adverse events. Specific Aim 2: Explore the effects of the tele-rehabilitation program (N=40). Hypothesis 2: At 12 weeks, participants in the tele-rehabilitation (experimental) arm, compared to education only (control) arm, will have a trend of greater improvements in outcomes, including: 1. accelerometry-measured physical activity (primary outcome); and 2. functional capacity, self-reported physical activity, control of dyspnea and anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life (secondary outcomes).

Interventions

The tele-rehabilitation intervention will include education, inspiratory muscle training, and behavioral support to promote walking.

The education only arm will receive information on the importance of general exercise following lung cancer treatment.

Sponsors

American Lung Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaiser Permanente
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a pilot, parallel randomized study of an exercise + behavioral support intervention to reduce dyspnea and improve walking behavior among lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy. Forty participants will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control arm, with assessments of feasibility, acceptability, safety, and patient-centered outcomes. The intervention period is 12 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* history of stage I-IIIA lung cancer; * completed curative intent therapy (i.e., lung cancer resection surgery, definitive radiation, or concurrent chemoradiation) within 1-6 months; * access to a mobile phone or personal computer with internet access; * willingness to wear activity trackers

Exclusion criteria

* dementia (or cognitive impairment identified by chart review) resulting in inability to follow directions or provide written informed consent; * acute myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, acute cerebrovascular event, or acute asthma exacerbation in past 2 months; * spontaneous pneumothorax in past 12 months; * Parkinson's disease; * multiple sclerosis; * amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; * additional movement/gait disorders that may be identified by chart review

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in change in accelerometry-measured physical activity between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12).Physical activity will be measured by the activPAL4 device (PAL Technologies, Ltd).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in change in self-reported physical activity between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Self-reported physical activity will be measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form
Difference in change in control of dyspnea between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Dyspnea control will be measured using the the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire.
Difference in change in functional capacity between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Functional capacity will be measured using the mobile six-minute walk test.
Difference in change in sleep quality between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Sleep quality will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Difference in change in quality of life between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Quality of life will be measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Difference in change in anxiety symptoms between baseline and week 12Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12)Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the General Anxiety Disorder-7

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026