Skip to content

Post Facilitation Stretch Versus Active Isolated Stretching Along With Deep Friction Massage in Wallet Sciatica.

Effects of Post Facilitation Stretch Versus Active Isolated Stretching Along With Deep Friction Massage in Wallet Sciatica.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05058820
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-09-28
Start date
2021-09-03
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2021-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wallet Sciatica

Keywords

Active Isolated stretching, Deep friction massage, Post Facilitation stretching, Piriformis syndrome

Brief summary

To compare the effects of post facilitation stretch and active isolated stretch along with deep friction massage on pain pressure threshold of trigger points, disability, muscle length, and hip joint range of motion in wallet sciatica.

Detailed description

Literature shows the effectiveness of both techniques post facilitation stretch and active isolated stretch but didn't report any comparison. In this study, investigator diagnosed the patients with wallet sciatica who came with the complaint of low back pain. Both techniques were compared to determine the effectiveness in patients with wallet sciatica having trigger points.

Interventions

Hot pack 10 mins/ 1set/ (3 days/ week), TENS 10 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Post facilitation stretch 15 secs isometric hold/ 15 secs stretch/ 30 secs relax/ 5 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Deep friction massage 5 minutes/ (3 days/ week). A total of 6 weeks (18 sessions, 3 days/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

Hot pack 10 mins/ 1set/ (3 days/ week), TENS 10 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Active Isolated Stretching 2 secs hold/ 10 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Deep friction massage 5 minutes/ (3 days/ week). A total of 6 weeks (18 sessions, 3 days/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pain (Grade greater than 3) * Chronic pain (greater than 3 months) buttock pain. * Patients with piriformis tightness less than 40 degrees. * Patients with active trigger points of the piriformis.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with tumor * Patients with cognitive problems. * Recent or history of hip trauma or injury. * Recent abdominal surgery. * Any other orthopedic or neurological condition of hip and lumbar spine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain pressure threshold18 daysChanges from baseline, Pain pressure threshold was measured through Algometer.
Disability18 daysChanges from baseline, Disability was measured through lower extremity functional scale. It consists of 20 questions. Minimum score is 0 and Maximum 80. minimum score shows greater disability and maximum indicate decreased disability.
Piriformis Muscle Length18 daysChanges from baseline, Piriformis Muscle Length was measured through Goniometer by performing stretch test. Less than 40 degree internal rotation at hip indicates piriformis tightness.
Hip joint range of motion18 daysChanges from baseline, Hip joint range of motion was measured through Goniometer.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactMomena Shahzad, MSPT-OMPT
momena.shahzad@riphah.edu.pk+92-334-2848148
Backup ContactImran Amjad, Phd
Imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026