Skip to content

Developing Text-based Support for Parents of Adolescents After an Emergency Department Visit

Developing Text-based Support for Parents of Suicidal Adolescents After Emergency Department Visits: A Multi-component Intervention Pilot

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05058664
Enrollment
240
Registered
2021-09-28
Start date
2021-11-08
Completion date
2022-09-26
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Suicide

Keywords

Emergency Department

Brief summary

The researchers seek to develop a text message intervention for caregivers of adolescents at elevated suicide risk following discharge from emergency department (ED) care.

Detailed description

Participants in the trial included 120 youth-parent dyads (120 youths and 120 parents). As the ultimate focus of the intervention is on improving youth outcomes, participant-related descriptives are provided for youth participants, except where noted specifically to be parent-related data.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALA-F texting component

Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.

BEHAVIORALP-F texting component

Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

There are 3 arms: control and 2 intervention arms. One of the intervention arms includes further twice daily (within-person) randomizations.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Parent eligibility: Inclusion Criteria: * Parent of eligible teen

Exclusion criteria

* Not owning a cell phone with text messaging capability. Teen eligibility: Inclusion Criteria: * Recent suicidal ideation (within last 2 weeks) and/or suicide attempt within the last month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Eligible Youth-Parent Dyads Who Agree to Participate in the Study,At the time of youth Emergency Department visitData represent participant dyads who were eligible and approached about study participation, and who agreed to take part in the study.
Participant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsUp to 12 weeksData was used to determine retention rate among the participant dyads. We report on follow up completion for both adolescent and caregiver members of the dyad.
Percentage of Participants Randomized to the Intervention Who Remained Active (Texting Arms Only)Up to 6 weeksResults represent parent participants who did not request stopping the intervention (i.e., did not request to stop receiving messages).
Participating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)Up to 6 weeksMeasured using the Modified Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), which was a 2-question survey. Each question had a range of 1-4. Adult participants were asked to rate both their overall satisfaction (1 meaning not satisfied to 4 meaning highly satisfied), and the likelihood that they would recommend their particular assigned intervention to a friend (1 meaning highly unlikely to 4 meaning highly likely).
Number of and Reasons for Active WithdrawalsUp to 12 weeksParent participant request to withdraw from the study. Study intention was to collect the number of and reasons for withdrawals, but the sole withdrawal did not provide a reason.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Unless indicated otherwise, the data shown below represent youth participants, as they were the object of the study. Of 125 youth participants consented, 5 were removed due to administrative issues. 4 participants were not randomized due to a platform glitch, and 1 consented participant turned out to be ineligible. These 5 were not included in the analysis, so 120 dyads are included in the trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control (Standard Care)
Standard Emergency Department services (usual care)
37
A-F Texting Component
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
42
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
41
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyNo follow-up data provided402
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl (Standard Care)A-F Texting ComponentA-F Texting Plus P-F Texting ComponentTotal
Age, Continuous
Age of adolescent members of dyads
15.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42
14.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43
14.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19
14.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36
Age, Continuous
Age of caregiver members of dyads
45.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15
43.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89
45.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15
44.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads
Not Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants36 Participants32 Participants96 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants4 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected)
Unknown or Not Reported
37 Participants42 Participants41 Participants120 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
More than one race
4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads
White
25 Participants34 Participants31 Participants90 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads
White
32 Participants38 Participants37 Participants107 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 dyads42 dyads41 dyads120 dyads
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of adolescent members of dyads
Female
23 Participants29 Participants27 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of adolescent members of dyads
Male
14 Participants13 Participants14 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of caregiver members of dyads
Female
31 Participants38 Participants37 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of caregiver members of dyads
Male
6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 420 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 212 / 261 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Number of and Reasons for Active Withdrawals

Parent participant request to withdraw from the study. Study intention was to collect the number of and reasons for withdrawals, but the sole withdrawal did not provide a reason.

Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants ConsentedNumber of and Reasons for Active Withdrawals0 Participants
A-F Texting ComponentNumber of and Reasons for Active Withdrawals0 Participants
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting ComponentNumber of and Reasons for Active Withdrawals1 Participants
Primary

Participant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up Assessments

Data was used to determine retention rate among the participant dyads. We report on follow up completion for both adolescent and caregiver members of the dyad.

Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Participants ConsentedParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Adolescent Responses29 Responses from dyad members
Participants ConsentedParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Parent responses33 Responses from dyad members
A-F Texting ComponentParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Adolescent Responses35 Responses from dyad members
A-F Texting ComponentParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Parent responses42 Responses from dyad members
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting ComponentParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Parent responses38 Responses from dyad members
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting ComponentParticipant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up AssessmentsCount of Adolescent Responses27 Responses from dyad members
Primary

Participating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)

Measured using the Modified Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), which was a 2-question survey. Each question had a range of 1-4. Adult participants were asked to rate both their overall satisfaction (1 meaning not satisfied to 4 meaning highly satisfied), and the likelihood that they would recommend their particular assigned intervention to a friend (1 meaning highly unlikely to 4 meaning highly likely).

Time frame: Up to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants ConsentedParticipating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)Overall satisfaction3.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Participants ConsentedParticipating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)Recommend to a friend3.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
A-F Texting ComponentParticipating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)Recommend to a friend3.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
A-F Texting ComponentParticipating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)Overall satisfaction3.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Primary

Percentage of Eligible Youth-Parent Dyads Who Agree to Participate in the Study,

Data represent participant dyads who were eligible and approached about study participation, and who agreed to take part in the study.

Time frame: At the time of youth Emergency Department visit

Population: The data shown here represent potential youth participants who were eligible, as indicators of the dyad because they were the focus of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Participants ConsentedPercentage of Eligible Youth-Parent Dyads Who Agree to Participate in the Study,125 Parent-youth dyads
Primary

Percentage of Participants Randomized to the Intervention Who Remained Active (Texting Arms Only)

Results represent parent participants who did not request stopping the intervention (i.e., did not request to stop receiving messages).

Time frame: Up to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants ConsentedPercentage of Participants Randomized to the Intervention Who Remained Active (Texting Arms Only)42 Participants
A-F Texting ComponentPercentage of Participants Randomized to the Intervention Who Remained Active (Texting Arms Only)39 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026