Skip to content

Engaging Families to Improve the Care of Patients With Hypospadias

Engaging Families to Improve the Care of Patients With Hypospadias

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05056311
Enrollment
65
Registered
2021-09-24
Start date
2021-06-09
Completion date
2022-10-06
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypospadias

Keywords

hypospadias, shared decision making, decisional regret, decision aid

Brief summary

Reconstructive surgery is advocated for most children with hypospadias, a condition in which the pee hold is not in the correct place on the penis, to prevent potentially serious cosmetic and functional problems. Parents faced with a decision about hypospadias repair encounter an irreversible choice with potentially lifelong consequences. Recent studies have identified decisional conflict (DC) and decisional regret (DR) as a significant problem for parents. Several recent guidelines on complex urologic topics suggest that shared decision-making (SDM) is the optimal approach. A pilot test of a decision aid website by parents potentially facing this decision will be conducted to measure pre- and post-outcomes, in order to develop a fuller understanding of how urologists can effectively provide parents with optimal decision support. Parents will answer questions via phone up to four time points, twice before (T1 and T2) and twice after seeing a urologist for a hypospadias referral (T3 and T4). If the urologist diagnoses hypospadias but recommends no surgery, the final data collection point will be three months after the urology visit. If the urologist recommends repair surgery, the final data collection point will be six months after surgery.

Interventions

OTHERDecision Aid Website

The (private) decision aid website contains information in text, graphic, and video form about hypospadias and considerations for choosing surgery and no surgery.

Sponsors

Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
0 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* parents 18 years of age and older of sons with hypospadias, or a tentative hypospadias diagnosis, and/or referral to a urologist for hypospadias * patient newborn up to age 5 years * parent able to consent and do interview in English * parent access to a reliable internet and smart phone, tablet, or computer to view the website * child/patient scheduled to see a urologist, but must not have yet seen the urologist at the time of enrollment * parent aware that there is an issue with child's pee hole * parent planning to attend urology appointment

Exclusion criteria

* As target enrollment groups are filled, parents may be excluded in order to achieve a balanced sample, e.g. exclusion of mothers/female caregivers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Eligible Parents Screened (Feasibility)Baseline (T1)Recruitment is defined as the number of potential participants who are eligible divided by the total number screened multiplied by 100.
Percent of Eligible Parents Enrolled (Feasibility)Baseline (T1)The number of parents enrolled divided by the total number of parents who were eligible multiplied by 100.
Decision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)Acceptability of a decision aid refers to ratings regarding the comprehensibility of components of a decision aid, its length, clarity, amount of information, and balance in presentation of information about options. The tool has 4 questions with answers on a Likert scale ranging from 1-5 (length, amount of information, and balance) and 1-4 (clarity). A response of 3 is ideal for information, length, and balance and a response of 1 is ideal for clarity.
Percentage of Parents Retained in the Study (Feasibility)T1 to T4, a total of approximately 6 monthsNumber of parents who completed the study divided by the number of eligible parents enrolled who completed the study multiplied by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)This is a single question created by the investigator asking Do you intend for your son to have hypospadias surgery? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in response, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.
Hypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)This is a single question created by the investigator asking Do you intend for your son to have hypospadias surgery? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in response, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.
Awareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)This is a single question created by the investigator asking Is there a decision to make about whether your son should have surgery for his hypospadias? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in awareness of decision, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.
Mean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T1 and T2Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making, and effective decision making (in full version) such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. This study utilizes the full version, a Likert-type scale consisting of 16 questions and answer options of strongly agree to strongly disagree. Total scores range from 0-100, a higher score means more decisional conflict.
Mean Shared Decision Making Questionnaire ScoreInitial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)The Shared Decision Making Questionnaire measures the decisional process in medical encounters from both the patient and the physician perspectives. The questionnaire contains 9 questions with answers on a 6-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of shared decision making.
Mean Preparation for Decision Making ScorePre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)The Preparation for Decision Making scale (Prep-DM) scale assesses a patient's perception of how useful a decision aid or other decision support intervention is in preparing the respondent to communicate with their practitioner at a consultation focused on making a health decision. The scale contains 10 questions with answers on a Likert Scale Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Awareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)This is a single question created by the investigator asking Is there a decision to make about whether your son should have surgery for his hypospadias? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in awareness of decision, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.
Mean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T2 and T3Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making, and effective decision making (in full version) such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. This study utilizes the full version, a Likert-type scale consisting of 16 questions and answer options of strongly agree to strongly disagree. Total scores range from 0-100, a higher score means more decisional conflict. Time frame revised to address original entry error.
Mean Decision-Specific Knowledge ScoresBaseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)Decision-Specific Knowledge is a six-question tool with multiple choice question and answer options created by the investigator to measure pre/post knowledge of hypospadias and repair surgery. Total scores range from 0-100% with a higher score indicating more correct answers.
Mean Decisional Regret Scale Score3-month post-consultation (T4)The Decision Regret Scale measures distress or remorse after a decision. Brehaut's (2003) 5-item scale has scores ranging from 0-100, where 100 indicates maximal regret, and 0 indicates no regret.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid Website
All enrolled parents will view the decision aid website for as long and as frequently as they wish before the initial visit to the urologist. Decision Aid Website: The (private) decision aid website contains information in text, graphic, and video form about hypospadias and considerations for choosing surgery and no surgery.
64
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDropped from study due to no Hypospadias23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParent Utilization of Decision Aid Website
Age, Continuous29.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.37
Child's Age at Consent149 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 197
Child's Meatal Location (Confirmed hypospadias)
Distal Shaft
10 Participants
Child's Meatal Location (Confirmed hypospadias)
Glanular (includes megameatus)
15 Participants
Child's Meatal Location (Confirmed hypospadias)
Mid Shaft
3 Participants
Child's Meatal Location (Confirmed hypospadias)
Penoscrotal
2 Participants
Child's Meatal Location (Confirmed hypospadias)
Perineal
0 Participants
Education
College Degree
22 Participants
Education
Graduated High School
13 Participants
Education
Post-Graduate Degree
6 Participants
Education
Some College
19 Participants
Education
Some High School
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Health Insurance
Other insurance type/unknown
9 Participants
Health Insurance
Private (Anthem/Aetna/TBC)
19 Participants
Health Insurance
Public (Medicaid/Children's Special Services/TBC)
28 Participants
Health Insurance
Self-pay
8 Participants
Health Literacy
Always
2 Participants
Health Literacy
Never
39 Participants
Health Literacy
Often
2 Participants
Health Literacy
Rarely
13 Participants
Health Literacy
Sometimes
8 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced
3 Participants
Marital Status
Married
33 Participants
Marital Status
Other
1 Participants
Marital Status
Separated
1 Participants
Marital Status
Single
26 Participants
Marital Status
Widowed
0 Participants
Mean Income by Zip Code55900 dollars annually
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18000
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Decision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)

Acceptability of a decision aid refers to ratings regarding the comprehensibility of components of a decision aid, its length, clarity, amount of information, and balance in presentation of information about options. The tool has 4 questions with answers on a Likert scale ranging from 1-5 (length, amount of information, and balance) and 1-4 (clarity). A response of 3 is ideal for information, length, and balance and a response of 1 is ideal for clarity.

Time frame: Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Information : Much less than wanted0 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Information : A little less than wanted4 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Information : About right38 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Information : A little more than wanted7 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Information : Much more than wanted5 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Length: Much too long1 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Length: A little too long2 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Length: About right45 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Length: A little too short5 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Length: Much too short1 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Clarity: Everything was clear16 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Clarity: Most things were clear34 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Clarity: Some things were clear3 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Clarity: Many things were unclear1 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Balance: Clearly slanted to surgery3 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Balance: Slightly slanted to surgery10 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Balance: Completely balanced38 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Balance: Slightly slanted to no surgery3 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteDecision Aid Acceptability by Categories of Information, Length, Clarity, and Balance (Acceptability)Balance: Clearly slanted to no surgery0 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Parents Retained in the Study (Feasibility)

Number of parents who completed the study divided by the number of eligible parents enrolled who completed the study multiplied by 100.

Time frame: T1 to T4, a total of approximately 6 months

Population: All available data are reported. Of the 64 parents who completed T1, 9 were lost to follow up and 1 withdrew. Of the 54 who completed T2, 1 parent was lost to follow up before the consultation. Of the 53 completing the consultation, 23 were found to not to have hypospadias. Of the 30 patients diagnosed with hypospadias, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to T3. Of the 29 parents who completed T3, 2 parents were lost to follow up prior to T4 resulting in a total of 27 parents who completed T4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsitePercentage of Parents Retained in the Study (Feasibility)42.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Eligible Parents Enrolled (Feasibility)

The number of parents enrolled divided by the total number of parents who were eligible multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline (T1)

Population: All available data are reported. Data reported for eligible parents.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsitePercent of Eligible Parents Enrolled (Feasibility)48.5 percentage of parents enrolled
Primary

Percent of Eligible Parents Screened (Feasibility)

Recruitment is defined as the number of potential participants who are eligible divided by the total number screened multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline (T1)

Population: All available data are reported. Data reported for parents who were screened for eligibility.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsitePercent of Eligible Parents Screened (Feasibility)90.5 percentage of parents recruited
Secondary

Awareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2

This is a single question created by the investigator asking Is there a decision to make about whether your son should have surgery for his hypospadias? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in awareness of decision, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.

Time frame: Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T1Yes37 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T1No6 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T1Unsure21 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T2Yes34 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T2No0 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T1 and T2T2Unsure20 Participants
Secondary

Awareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3

This is a single question created by the investigator asking Is there a decision to make about whether your son should have surgery for his hypospadias? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in awareness of decision, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.

Time frame: Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. After completing the consultation, 23 were diagnosed without hypospadias and were discontinued. One parent was lost to follow up during T3.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T3No1 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T2Yes34 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T2No20 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T2Unsure0 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T3Yes20 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteAwareness of Decision by Category at T2 and T3T3Unsure8 Participants
Secondary

Hypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2

This is a single question created by the investigator asking Do you intend for your son to have hypospadias surgery? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in response, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.

Time frame: Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T1Yes31 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T1No2 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T1Unsure31 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T2Yes27 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T2No2 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T1 and T2T2Unsure25 Participants
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Hypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3

This is a single question created by the investigator asking Do you intend for your son to have hypospadias surgery? with yes/no/unsure answer options to measure a change in response, or not, after viewing the decision aid website.

Time frame: Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. After completing the consultation, 23 were diagnosed without hypospadias and were discontinued. One parent was lost to follow up during T3.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T2Yes27 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T2No25 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T2Unsure2 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T3Yes18 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T3No1 Participants
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteHypospadias Treatment Preference by Category at T2 and T3T3Unsure10 Participants
p-value: 0.6374McNemar
Secondary

Mean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T1 and T2

The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making, and effective decision making (in full version) such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. This study utilizes the full version, a Likert-type scale consisting of 16 questions and answer options of strongly agree to strongly disagree. Total scores range from 0-100, a higher score means more decisional conflict.

Time frame: Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. Data reported includes participants who completed the Decisional Conflict Scale for T1, T2, and T3. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. After completing the consultation, 23 were diagnosed without hypospadias and were discontinued.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T1 and T2T135.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T1 and T2T221.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.84
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T2 and T3

The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making, and effective decision making (in full version) such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. This study utilizes the full version, a Likert-type scale consisting of 16 questions and answer options of strongly agree to strongly disagree. Total scores range from 0-100, a higher score means more decisional conflict. Time frame revised to address original entry error.

Time frame: Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2), Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. Of the 53 who completed the consultation, 23 were found to not to have hypospadias and were discontinued. One parent was lost to follow up during T3, resulting in 29.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T2 and T3T38.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.61
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score at T2 and T3T221.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.84
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Decisional Regret Scale Score

The Decision Regret Scale measures distress or remorse after a decision. Brehaut's (2003) 5-item scale has scores ranging from 0-100, where 100 indicates maximal regret, and 0 indicates no regret.

Time frame: 3-month post-consultation (T4)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. After completing the consultation, 23 were diagnosed without hypospadias and were discontinued. One parent was lost to follow up during T3. Two parents were lost to follow up between T3 and T4 totaling 27.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decisional Regret Scale Score25.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.03
Secondary

Mean Decision-Specific Knowledge Scores

Decision-Specific Knowledge is a six-question tool with multiple choice question and answer options created by the investigator to measure pre/post knowledge of hypospadias and repair surgery. Total scores range from 0-100% with a higher score indicating more correct answers.

Time frame: Baseline (T1), Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. 64 participants completed the baseline decision-specific knowledge quiz but 10 did not complete the pre-clinic decision-specific knowledge quiz. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study. Scores are reported for 54 participants who completed the baseline and pre-clinic decision-specific knowledge quiz.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decision-Specific Knowledge ScoresT154.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.24
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Decision-Specific Knowledge ScoresT275.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.42
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Preparation for Decision Making Score

The Preparation for Decision Making scale (Prep-DM) scale assesses a patient's perception of how useful a decision aid or other decision support intervention is in preparing the respondent to communicate with their practitioner at a consultation focused on making a health decision. The scale contains 10 questions with answers on a Likert Scale Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.

Time frame: Pre-consultation, 1 week after baseline (T2)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Preparation for Decision Making Score82.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Secondary

Mean Shared Decision Making Questionnaire Score

The Shared Decision Making Questionnaire measures the decisional process in medical encounters from both the patient and the physician perspectives. The questionnaire contains 9 questions with answers on a 6-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of shared decision making.

Time frame: Initial post-consultation, within 48 hours of urology visit (T3)

Population: All available data are reported. Between T1 and T2, 9 parents were lost to follow up and 1 parent withdrew from the study for a total of 54. Of the 54, 1 parent was lost to follow up prior to provider consultation. After completing the consultation, 23 were diagnosed without hypospadias and were discontinued. One parent was lost to follow up before T3, resulting in 29 parents.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parent Utilization of Decision Aid WebsiteMean Shared Decision Making Questionnaire Score82.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026