Skip to content

A Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole

A Randomized Double-blind, Double Dummy, Active Comparator-controlled Dose-finding Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis Due to Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Los Angeles Grade C or D, and Patients With at Least Partial Symptom Response But Endoscopically Still Unhealed After 8 Weeks History of Standard Treatment Healing Course With Proton-pump Inhibitor (PPI), to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole, and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05055128
Enrollment
248
Registered
2021-09-24
Start date
2021-08-11
Completion date
2022-09-01
Last updated
2023-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erosive Esophagitis

Keywords

Lansoprazole, Los Angeles Grade, Double-blind, Active comparator-controlled, Proton-pump inhibitor, Dose selection

Brief summary

This study will be conducted in patients with erosive esophagitis due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) Los Angeles (LA) grades C or D, and in patients with at least partial symptom response but still endoscopically unhealed (LA grades A or B) after 8 weeks history of standard treatment healing course with PPI, designed to support dose selection for Phase 3 and to investigate safety, tolerability, and healing rates after 4 weeks treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent 4 weeks treatment with Lansoprazole.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study with a parallel-group design including four arms with X842 and one arm with Lansoprazole. Randomization to one of the treatments with X842 twice daily (BID) 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, or Lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (QD) will be based on a 1:1:1:1:1 scheme. The duration of each patient's participation in the study, including screening, blind treatment period, and open-label treatment period will be approximately 60 days. The patients will be randomized for 4 weeks of double-blind treatment and will be provided with investigational medicinal product for 35 days. All patients will have an endoscopic evaluation after 4 weeks of treatment. Following the endoscopic evaluation, all patients will receive subsequent 4 weeks of open-label treatment with Lansoprazole. Repeated symptom evaluation to detect symptom patterns will be assessed during this period.

Interventions

DRUGX842

Patients will receive X842 tablets.

DRUGX842 Dummy

Patients will receive matching placebo tablets for X842.

DRUGLansoprazole

Patients will receive Lansoprazole capsule.

DRUGLansoprazole Dummy

Patients will receive matching placebo capsules for Lansoprazole.

Sponsors

Parexel
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Cinclus Pharma AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 kg/m\^2 at screening. 2. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with endoscopically confirmed esophagitis: * LA grade C or D ≤7 days before randomization (with or without historical PPI treatment) or * LA grade A or B ≤7 days before randomization and history of treatment with the standard healing course of PPI for minimum of 8 weeks prior to screening and ≤7 days of non-treatment during this period and at least partial symptom response during the minimum of 8 weeks of PPI treatment. 3. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol (including capsule swallowing, diary completion, etc.). 4. Capable of signing informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. History or presence of any clinically significant cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, or neurological disease or disorder. 2. Patients with so-called alarm features in symptomatology, like odynophagia, severe dysphagia, bleeding, weight loss, anemia, and blood in stool pointing to a possible malignant disease of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. 3. Present clinically significant psychiatric diagnosis. 4. History of malignancy of any organ system. 5. Presence of esophageal ulcer, stricture, Barrett´s esophagus or suspected esophagitis secondary to infection, inflammatory disease, ingestion of erosive chemicals or history of any surgical or medical condition which might significantly alter the Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) status or the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs. 6. Known severe atrophic gastritis. 7. Any planned major surgery within the duration of the study. 8. History of a positive result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to Hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBcAg), or antibody to Hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) or presence of these findings on screening. 9. History of long QTc syndrome (e.g. QTc ≥450 ms for males and ≥470 ms for females). 10. Cardiac arrhythmias or any clinically significant abnormalities in the resting 12-lead ECG at the time of screening, as judged by the Investigator. 11. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity. 12. Current or history of alcohol, drug abuse and/or use of anabolic steroids within 2 years prior to screening. 13. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 14. Patients who have previously participated (completed or withdrawn) in this study CX842A2201.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingWeek 4The healing of erosive esophagitis due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was assessed. It supported the dose selection X842,through the assessment of healing of erosive esophagitis due to GERD based on endoscopic assessment after 4 weeks of treatment. The dose that would lead to having 85% of the patients have esophageal mucosa healing after 4 weeks of treatment. Following the endoscopic evaluation, all patients received subsequent 4 weeks of open-label treatment with lansoprazole. Repeated symptom evaluation was assessed during this period to detect the symptom pattern. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation was assessed using the validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries (RESQ-eDiary).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)From Screening (Day -7 to Day 0) until Week 8The safety and tolerability of the four dose levels of X842 and Lansoprazole were evaluated, where Lansoprazole served as the active comparator. Here TEAE- Treatment-emergent adverse event, ADR- Adverse drug reaction, SAE- Serious adverse event, and AESI- Adverse events of special interest.
Percentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8Heartburn-free in a 24-hour day was a day where patient reported having no burning feeling or pain behind breast or in center of upper stomach for both morning and evening. Percentage of heartburn-free 24-hour days based on eDiary(Reflux Symptom Questionnaire electronic Diary: RESQ-eDiary) was evaluated. Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with four dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks Lansoprazole treatment in open-label. Modified RESQ-eDiary was validated self-reported questionnaire electronic symptom diary. mRESQ-eD has 3 domains \[i.e. Heartburn (min-max: 0-10), Other GERD signs/symptoms (min-max:0-15) and Regurgitations/Reflux (min-max: 0-8)\]. Endoscopy followed by lansoprazole administration and symptom evaluation using PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries assessed acid control achieved with X842 at 4 weeks.
Percentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8Heartburn with at most mild symptoms in a 24-hour day was defined as a day where the patient reported having either no symptoms, very mild symptoms, or mild burning feeling or pain behind the breast or in the center of the upper stomach (score between 0-2) for both morning and evening. Heartburn assessed the severity as per the following scores (0=Did not have, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Moderately severe, 5=Severe). Here higher scores represent the worst outcome, whereas lower scores represent the better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole, and symptom evaluation was conducted to detect patterns. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation involved the use of validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.
Investigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeeks 1 and 8Investigator assessed severity and frequency of patients' heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia in 7 days. Assessment included both severity grade (for severity, items were coded: none, mild, moderate, severe where none represented no complaints, severe represented incapacitating symptoms) and frequency (for frequency, a 7-graded Likert scale was used, ranging from none to all of time) of symptoms. Symptoms were scored as follows: none (no complaints), mild (aware of symptom, but easily tolerated), moderate (discomforting symptom, sufficient to cause interference with normal daily activities and/or sleep), severe (incapacitating symptom, with inability to perform normal daily activities and/or sleep). Following endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.Here, for frequency- All of the time and None of the time, and for symptoms- none and severe data has been presented.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1, and 8Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with 4 dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks of open-label treatment with Lansoprazole. Heartburn version of QOLRAD is a disease-specific instrument containing 25 questions addressing concerns associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Questions were rated on a seven-grade (1-7) Likert scale, where a score of 1 represented low quality of life, and as score increased, the patient's condition was considered better. Questions were categorized into 5 domains: emotional distress, sleep disturbance, vitality, food/drink problems, and physical/social functioning. The score in each domain was calculated as the mean of all items in that domain. The score ranges from 1 to 175, higher scores mean a better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD and patient diaries.

Countries

Bulgaria, Czechia, Georgia, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 36 centers which included 248 patients across 08 countries. The trial began on 11 Aug 2021 (first patient enrolled) and was completed on 01 Sep 2022 (Last patient completed).

Pre-assignment details

The pre-treatment assessments were performed during the screening period (Day -7 to Day 0) prior to the first dose preferably. All the study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
X842 25 mg BID
Patients received 2 tablets (X842 25 mg + X842 dummy) and 1 capsule (Lansoprazole dummy) in the morning, and 2 tablets (X842 25 mg + X842 dummy) in the evening during 4-week double-blind treatment. Thereafter, patients received 1 capsule of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 4 weeks.
51
X842 50 mg BID
Patients received 2 tablets (X842 50 mg + X842 dummy) and 1 capsule (Lansoprazole dummy) in the morning, and 2 tablets (X842 50 mg + X842 dummy) in the evening during 4-week double-blind treatment. Thereafter, patients received 1 capsule of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 4 weeks.
48
X842 75 mg BID
Patients received 2 tablets (X842 50 mg + X842 25 mg) and 1 capsule (Lansoprazole dummy) in the morning, and 2 tablets (X842 50 mg + X842 25 mg) in the evening during 4-week double-blind treatment. Thereafter, patients received 1 capsule of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 4 weeks.
52
X842 100 mg BID
Patients received 2 tablets (X842 50 mg×2) and 1 capsule (Lansoprazole dummy) in the morning, and 2 tablets (X842 50 mg×2) in the evening during 4-week double-blind treatment. Thereafter, patients received 1 capsule of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 4 weeks.
47
Lansoprazole
Patients received 2 tablets (X842 dummy×2) and 1 capsule (Lansoprazole 30 mg) in the morning, and 2 tablets (X842 dummy×2) in the evening during 4-week double-blind treatment. Thereafter, patients received 1 capsule of Lansoprazole 30 mg QD for 4 weeks.
50
Total248

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event00011
Overall StudyOther10000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation00010
Overall StudyRandomized By Mistake01000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject52242

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicX842 25 mg BIDX842 50 mg BIDX842 75 mg BIDX842 100 mg BIDLansoprazoleTotal
Age, Continuous48.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.99
45.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.11
48.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.05
54.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.26
49.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.41
49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.81
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants48 Participants50 Participants47 Participants48 Participants242 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
50 Participants48 Participants52 Participants47 Participants50 Participants247 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants19 Participants22 Participants17 Participants20 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants29 Participants30 Participants30 Participants30 Participants152 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 510 / 480 / 520 / 470 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 5110 / 4812 / 5211 / 4710 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 510 / 481 / 520 / 470 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing

The healing of erosive esophagitis due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was assessed. It supported the dose selection X842,through the assessment of healing of erosive esophagitis due to GERD based on endoscopic assessment after 4 weeks of treatment. The dose that would lead to having 85% of the patients have esophageal mucosa healing after 4 weeks of treatment. Following the endoscopic evaluation, all patients received subsequent 4 weeks of open-label treatment with lansoprazole. Repeated symptom evaluation was assessed during this period to detect the symptom pattern. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation was assessed using the validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries (RESQ-eDiary).

Time frame: Week 4

Population: The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. FAS erosive is a subset of FAS consisted of patients who had been classified as erosive (Grade A, B, C or D) as screening according to the central reading or imputed by local reading if missing.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing28 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing28 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing32 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing18 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa Healing20 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) Score

Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with 4 dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks of open-label treatment with Lansoprazole. Heartburn version of QOLRAD is a disease-specific instrument containing 25 questions addressing concerns associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Questions were rated on a seven-grade (1-7) Likert scale, where a score of 1 represented low quality of life, and as score increased, the patient's condition was considered better. Questions were categorized into 5 domains: emotional distress, sleep disturbance, vitality, food/drink problems, and physical/social functioning. The score in each domain was calculated as the mean of all items in that domain. The score ranges from 1 to 175, higher scores mean a better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD and patient diaries.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, and 8

Population: The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Food/Drink Problems Score1.84 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.229
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Vitality Score2.84 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.257
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Food/Drink Problems Score3.08 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.249
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1:Vitality Score1.55 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.237
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Sleep Disturbance Score2.78 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.266
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Emotional Distress Score2.76 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.265
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Emotional Distress Score1.69 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.247
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Sleep Disturbance Score1.60 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.25
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Physical/Social Functioning Score2.06 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.262
X842 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.26 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.247
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Emotional Distress Score2.51 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.275
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Emotional Distress Score1.55 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.251
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Food/Drink Problems Score1.62 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.232
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Food/Drink Problems Score2.97 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.259
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.32 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.252
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Physical/Social Functioning Score2.26 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.271
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Sleep Disturbance Score1.45 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.255
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Sleep Disturbance Score2.48 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.276
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1:Vitality Score1.51 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.24
X842 50 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Vitality Score2.79 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.268
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.57 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.249
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1:Vitality Score1.42 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.224
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Food/Drink Problems Score1.32 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.217
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Food/Drink Problems Score2.34 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.24
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Emotional Distress Score1.84 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.253
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.02 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.233
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Sleep Disturbance Score1.08 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.236
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Emotional Distress Score1.14 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.233
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Vitality Score2.25 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.247
X842 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Sleep Disturbance Score1.89 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.254
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Emotional Distress Score2.00 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.278
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Vitality Score2.21 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.272
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Emotional Distress Score1.54 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.255
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Food/Drink Problems Score1.65 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.238
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.60 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.274
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Sleep Disturbance Score1.91 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.279
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1:Vitality Score1.50 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.246
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Sleep Disturbance Score1.49 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.258
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Food/Drink Problems Score2.28 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.264
X842 100 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.19 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.255
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Food/Drink Problems Score2.56 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.256
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1:Vitality Score1.21 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.231
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Physical/Social Functioning Score0.97 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.241
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Physical/Social Functioning Score1.71 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.265
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Vitality Score2.19 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.264
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Sleep Disturbance Score1.54 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.244
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Emotional Distress Score1.34 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.241
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Sleep Disturbance Score2.37 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.27
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 1: Food/Drink Problems Score1.40 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.223
LansoprazoleChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreWeek 8: Emotional Distress Score2.19 Scores on scaleStandard Error 0.269
Secondary

Investigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and Severity

Investigator assessed severity and frequency of patients' heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia in 7 days. Assessment included both severity grade (for severity, items were coded: none, mild, moderate, severe where none represented no complaints, severe represented incapacitating symptoms) and frequency (for frequency, a 7-graded Likert scale was used, ranging from none to all of time) of symptoms. Symptoms were scored as follows: none (no complaints), mild (aware of symptom, but easily tolerated), moderate (discomforting symptom, sufficient to cause interference with normal daily activities and/or sleep), severe (incapacitating symptom, with inability to perform normal daily activities and/or sleep). Following endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.Here, for frequency- All of the time and None of the time, and for symptoms- none and severe data has been presented.

Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8

Population: The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time14 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time42 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time4 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time38 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time41 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None14 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None42 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- None1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe5 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- None38 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe3 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None41 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- None37 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe3 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None12 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None36 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time36 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time10 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- None0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time37 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time37 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe2 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time2 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time2 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None3 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None37 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time13 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time43 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- None44 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None41 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- None4 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe4 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time43 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time2 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time3 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time4 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None6 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None43 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe5 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time41 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None13 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe2 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time4 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time4 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time4 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None5 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time33 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time1 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time1 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time32 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe4 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None15 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe2 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None35 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- None5 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None33 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe2 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- None33 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time1 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time13 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time1 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time34 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time3 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None41 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe2 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time1 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Symptom- None12 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time39 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time40 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Dysphagia): Frequency- None of the time11 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- None of the time36 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- None of the time3 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time3 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Frequency- All of the time0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- Severe3 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None41 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Heartburn): Symptom- None1 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Dysphagia): Symptom- Severe0 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 1 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- None3 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Heartburn): Symptom- None38 Participants
LansoprazoleInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeek 8 (Regurgitation/Reflux): Symptom- Severe1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

The safety and tolerability of the four dose levels of X842 and Lansoprazole were evaluated, where Lansoprazole served as the active comparator. Here TEAE- Treatment-emergent adverse event, ADR- Adverse drug reaction, SAE- Serious adverse event, and AESI- Adverse events of special interest.

Time frame: From Screening (Day -7 to Day 0) until Week 8

Population: The safety analysis set consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE15 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE14 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any severe TEAE1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment related TEAE (ADR)4 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Serious TEAE1 Participants
X842 25 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent AESI0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any severe TEAE0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE10 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment related TEAE (ADR)2 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE10 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent AESI0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
X842 50 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Serious TEAE0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Serious TEAE1 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent AESI0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment related TEAE (ADR)0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE1 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any severe TEAE0 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE12 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE12 Participants
X842 75 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE11 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any severe TEAE0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment related TEAE (ADR)2 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent AESI0 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE11 Participants
X842 100 mg BIDNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Serious TEAE0 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment related TEAE (ADR)2 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment emergent AESI0 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any severe TEAE0 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any Serious TEAE0 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE10 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any SAE0 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE10 Participants
LansoprazoleNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour Days

Heartburn with at most mild symptoms in a 24-hour day was defined as a day where the patient reported having either no symptoms, very mild symptoms, or mild burning feeling or pain behind the breast or in the center of the upper stomach (score between 0-2) for both morning and evening. Heartburn assessed the severity as per the following scores (0=Did not have, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Moderately severe, 5=Severe). Here higher scores represent the worst outcome, whereas lower scores represent the better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole, and symptom evaluation was conducted to detect patterns. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation involved the use of validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.

Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8

Population: The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
X842 25 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 175.3 Percentage of daysStandard Error 3.78
X842 25 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 898.5 Percentage of daysStandard Error 4.34
X842 50 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 167.9 Percentage of daysStandard Error 3.85
X842 50 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 896.5 Percentage of daysStandard Error 4.27
X842 75 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 179.4 Percentage of daysStandard Error 3.62
X842 75 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 895.8 Percentage of daysStandard Error 4.08
X842 100 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 897.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 4.46
X842 100 mg BIDPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 169.7 Percentage of daysStandard Error 3.81
LansoprazolePercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 163.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 3.7
LansoprazolePercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeek 892.2 Percentage of daysStandard Error 4.26
Secondary

Percentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour Days

Heartburn-free in a 24-hour day was a day where patient reported having no burning feeling or pain behind breast or in center of upper stomach for both morning and evening. Percentage of heartburn-free 24-hour days based on eDiary(Reflux Symptom Questionnaire electronic Diary: RESQ-eDiary) was evaluated. Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with four dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks Lansoprazole treatment in open-label. Modified RESQ-eDiary was validated self-reported questionnaire electronic symptom diary. mRESQ-eD has 3 domains \[i.e. Heartburn (min-max: 0-10), Other GERD signs/symptoms (min-max:0-15) and Regurgitations/Reflux (min-max: 0-8)\]. Endoscopy followed by lansoprazole administration and symptom evaluation using PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries assessed acid control achieved with X842 at 4 weeks.

Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8

Population: The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
X842 25 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 127.0 Percentage of daysStandard Error 5.8
X842 25 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 882.4 Percentage of daysStandard Error 6.59
X842 50 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 125.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 5.91
X842 50 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 873.8 Percentage of daysStandard Error 6.51
X842 75 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 129.2 Percentage of daysStandard Error 5.56
X842 75 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 878.6 Percentage of daysStandard Error 6.19
X842 100 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 872.2 Percentage of daysStandard Error 6.78
X842 100 mg BIDPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 126.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 5.86
LansoprazolePercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 119.1 Percentage of daysStandard Error 5.68
LansoprazolePercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeek 859.2 Percentage of daysStandard Error 6.48

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026