Skip to content

The Necessity of Preoperative Bowel Preparation

The Necessity of Preoperative Bowel Preparation for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05053542
Enrollment
273
Registered
2021-09-22
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2021-05-10
Last updated
2021-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative, Analgesia

Brief summary

Hemorrhoidectomy is an common treatment for high-grade hemorrhoids. The necessity of preoperative bowel preparation (PBP) in hemorrhoidectomy is inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the benefit and safety of PBP in hemorrhoidectomy.

Detailed description

Hemorrhoidectomy is an effective treatment for high-grade hemorrhoids and is recommended in patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids. Common hemorrhoidectomy approaches include stapled hemorrhoidopexy and conventional procedures, such as Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Conventional techniques produce a lower recurrence rate, whereas stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter recovery time. Common complications after hemorrhoidectomy include urinary retention, pain, and delayed hemorrhage. Surgical site infection is a rare complication after hemorrhoid excision. Traditional opinions held that preoperative bowel preparation (PBP) reduces fecal mass and bacterial count in the bowel lumen, minimizing the risk of infective and anastomotic complications. However, a study that evaluated intramucosal bacterial count demonstrated that PBP does not reduce the colon bacterial count. A randomized control trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of PBP before colorectal surgery suggested that the procedure can be omitted. However, another RCT with 79 participants revealed that bowel preparation before anorectal surgery can result in less pain during the first postoperative defecation. A meta-analysis with 36 studies concluded that PBP before elective colorectal surgery does not affect the postoperative complication rate. On the contrary, the necessity of PBP before anorectal surgeries remains unreported. The choice of whether PBP has to be performed is often the surgeon's preference. It may be challenging for physicians to determine the appropriate decision of PBP before hemorrhoidectomy to reduce postoperative complications while minimizing patient discomfort.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEnema

Patients in the PBP group underwent a cleansing enema procedure with a solution of monosodium phosphate and disodium phosphate (EVAC enema 118 mL/bot, Purzer Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd) before hemorrhoidectomy, whereas patients in the non-PBP group skipped the procedure.

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients underwent hemorrhoidectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had received emergent or other anorectal surgery, such as fistulectomy, were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative pain and4 weeksA numerical rating scale (NRS) was used for measuring daily postoperative pain, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain ever experienced.
Post-operative oral analgesic use.4 weeksThe daily dose of oral analgesics was recorded to represent patients' dependence on medicine for postoperative pain control.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026