Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Islatravir in Combination With Lenacapavir in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV

A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Weekly Regimen of Islatravir in Combination With Lenacapavir in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05052996
Enrollment
142
Registered
2021-09-22
Start date
2021-10-05
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1 Infection

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral weekly islatravir (ISL) in combination with lenacapavir (LEN) in virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH) at Week 24.

Interventions

DRUGISL

Capsules administered orally without regard to food

DRUGLEN

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

DRUGB/F/TAF

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

DRUGISL/LEN FDC

Tablets administered orally without regard to food

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Received bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) for ≥ 24 weeks at screening. * Documented plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) \< 50 copies/mL (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is ≥ 50 copies/mL) for ≥ 24 weeks before and at screening. * Plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at screening. Key

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior virologic failure while receiving treatment for HIV-1. * Prior use of, or exposure to, islatravir (ISL) or lenacapavir (LEN). * Active, serious infections requiring parenteral therapy \< 30 days before randomization. * Active or occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection, defined as hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, or HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) positive as determined by the central laboratory. * Active hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, defined as detectable HCV RNA. * Any of the following laboratory values at screening: * Creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≤ 30 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula * CD4+ T-cells \< 200 cells/mm\^3 (Cohort 1); CD4+ T-cells \< 350 cells/mm\^3 (cohort 2). * Absolute lymphocyte count \< 900 cells/mm\^3 (cohort 2). * Individuals of childbearing potential (as defined in protocol) who have a positive serum pregnancy test at screening or positive urine and serum pregnancy tests at Day 1 prior to study drug administration. * Individuals who plan to continue breastfeeding during the study. * Documented historical or screening resistance reports showing nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or non-nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase, including M184V/I (Cohort 2). Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 24 window was between Day 148 and 189 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 12The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 12 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 12 window was between Day 71 and 105 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 48 window was between Day 316 and 378 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 12The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 12 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 12 window was between Day 71 and 105 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 24The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 24 window was between Day 148 and 189 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 48The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 48 window was between Day 316 and 378 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.
Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationUp to 5 yearsTEAEs were defined as 1 or both of any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug, or any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than the last exposure date after permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Percentages were rounded off.
Cohort 1: Plasma Concentrations for ISLAnytime postdose at Week 4
Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Islatravir (ISL)Anytime post dose on Day 1 and at either Week 12 or Week 18Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of ISLAnytime post dose on Day 1 and at either Week 12 or Week 18Tmax was defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of ISLAnytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18Ctau was defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of ISLAnytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18AUCtau was defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).
Plasma Concentrations for LENAnytime postdose at Week 4
Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of LENAnytime post dose on Day 1, Day 2 and at either Week 12 or 18Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of LENAnytime post dose on Day 1, Day 2 and at either Week 12 or Week 18Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of LENAnytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18Ctau was defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48Baseline and Week 48
Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of LENAnytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18AUCtau was defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORGilead Study Director

Gilead Sciences

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States. This is the primary results analysis including data up to Week 48 for the outcome measures. As Cohort 1 never reached Week 48, so, the data for some outcome measures for applicable timepoints up to Week 48 were reported for Cohort 2 only.

Pre-assignment details

322 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)
Participants received islatravir (ISL) 40 mg and lenacapavir (LEN) 600 mg orally on Days 1 and 2 and ISL 20 mg and LEN 300 mg orally weekly thereafter from Day 8. They were to take treatment up to at least Week 48, however, all participants were off study treatment prior to Week 12 in the study.
24
Cohort 1- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)
Participants received bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) 50/200/25 mg, orally, once daily. They were to take treatment up to Week 48, however, all participants were off study treatment prior to Week 12 in the study.
12
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)
Participants received ISL 2 mg and LEN 600 mg orally on Day 1 and 2 and ISL 2 mg and LEN 300 mg orally weekly thereafter from Day 8 for at least 48 weeks.
52
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)
Participants received bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) 50/200/25 mg once daily orally for at least 48 weeks. After 48 weeks, participants will switch from B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN and received ISL 2 mg and LEN 600 mg orally on Day 1 and Day 2, LEN 600 mg orally only on Day 2 and ISL 2 mg and LEN 300 mg orally weekly thereafter from Day 8 for at least 48 weeks.
52
Total140

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 1- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants12 Participants50 Participants46 Participants130 Participants
Age, Continuous42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants13 Participants17 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants8 Participants39 Participants35 Participants99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 Participants5 Participants21 Participants16 Participants55 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other or More Than One Race
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
10 Participants6 Participants25 Participants27 Participants68 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 Participants12 Participants52 Participants52 Participants140 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants10 Participants9 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants11 Participants42 Participants43 Participants118 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 120 / 530 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 247 / 1227 / 5229 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 123 / 520 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 24 window was between Day 148 and 189 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. As none of the participants reached Week 24 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm1.9 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Algorithm0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: The participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. As none of the participants reached Week 24 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24-4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 182.1
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24-57 cells/µLStandard Deviation 204.2
p-value: 0.347795% CI: [-37, 103]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

Population: The participants in the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. As none of the participants reached Week 48 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48-12 cells/µLStandard Deviation 214.7
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48-29 cells/µLStandard Deviation 186.1
p-value: 0.884995% CI: [-76, 66]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The participants from the Safety Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Baseline721 cells/µLStandard Deviation 265
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Change at Week 12-50 cells/µLStandard Deviation 183
Cohort 1- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Change at Week 1218 cells/µLStandard Deviation 142.3
Cohort 1- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Baseline659 cells/µLStandard Deviation 304.8
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Baseline755 cells/µLStandard Deviation 223.6
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Change at Week 12-23 cells/µLStandard Deviation 185.6
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Baseline818 cells/µLStandard Deviation 271.3
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4)+ Cell Count at Week 12Change at Week 12-49 cells/µLStandard Deviation 180
p-value: 0.385995% CI: [-226, 91]ANOVA
p-value: 0.708595% CI: [-56, 82]ANCOVA
Secondary

Cohort 1: Plasma Concentrations for ISL

Time frame: Anytime postdose at Week 4

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis Set for Cohort 1 included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and have at least 1 nonmissing concentration value reported by the PK laboratory.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 1: Plasma Concentrations for ISL42.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 49.6
Secondary

Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Islatravir (ISL)

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.

Time frame: Anytime post dose on Day 1 and at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug, participated in the PK substudy, and had at least 1 nonmissing postdose concentration with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Islatravir (ISL)Day 119.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.55
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Islatravir (ISL)Week 12 or Week 1818.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.6
Secondary

Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of LEN

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.

Time frame: Anytime post dose on Day 1, Day 2 and at either Week 12 or 18

Population: The participants in Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of LENDay 146.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 29
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of LENDay 2183 ng/mLStandard Deviation 189
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of LENWeek 12 or Week 1897.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 73.2
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of ISL

AUCtau was defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).

Time frame: Anytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of ISL132 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 98.1
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of LEN

AUCtau was defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).

Time frame: Anytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: AUCtau of LEN10000 h*ng/mLStandard Deviation 7440
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of ISL

Ctau was defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.

Time frame: Anytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of ISL0.169 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.094
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of LEN

Ctau was defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.

Time frame: Anytime post dose at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Ctau of LEN36.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 22.5
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of ISL

Tmax was defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.

Time frame: Anytime post dose on Day 1 and at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of ISLDay 11.12 hoursStandard Deviation 1.03
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of ISLWeek 12 or Week 180.793 hoursStandard Deviation 0.423
Secondary

Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of LEN

Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.

Time frame: Anytime post dose on Day 1, Day 2 and at either Week 12 or Week 18

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Substudy Analysis Set for Cohort 2 with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of LENDay 26.61 hoursStandard Deviation 1.47
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of LENDay 111.4 hoursStandard Deviation 8.96
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Cohort 2: PK Parameter: Tmax of LENWeek 12 or Week 185.43 hoursStandard Deviation 1.63
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

TEAEs were defined as 1 or both of any AEs leading to premature discontinuation of study drug, or any AEs with an onset date on or after the study drug start date and no later than the last exposure date after permanent discontinuation of the study drug. Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 12 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 12 window was between Day 71 and 105 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. As none of the participants were on-treatment in Cohort 1 at Week 12 (required for the analysis of HIV RNA levels using US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm), this outcome measure for Cohort 1 could not be analyzed using US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm98.1 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm96.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-6.8, 11.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 12 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 12 window was between Day 71 and 105 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. As none of the participants were on-treatment in Cohort 1 at Week 12 (required for the analysis of HIV RNA levels using US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm), this outcome measure for Cohort 1 could not be analyzed using US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm1.9 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 24 window was between Day 148 and 189 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. As none of the participants reached Week 24 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm94.2 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm96.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-12.4, 8.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 48 window was between Day 316 and 378 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: The participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. As none of the participants reached Week 48 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm96.2 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm94.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-8.6, 12.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm

The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with the applicable study drug discontinuation status. Week 48 window was between Day 316 and 378 (inclusive). Percentages were rounded off.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: The participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. As none of the participants reached Week 48 timepoint in Cohort 1, data for Cohort 1 were not available for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm0 percentage of participants
Cohort2- Group 2 (B/F/TAF to ISL+LEN)Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 as Determined by the US FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations for LEN

Time frame: Anytime postdose at Week 4

Population: The participants in the Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set for Cohort 1 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1- Group 1 (ISL+LEN)Plasma Concentrations for LEN62.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 43.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026