Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Durability of Response and Safety of Nemolizumab for 24 Weeks in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study to Assess the Durability of Effect and Safety of Nemolizumab for 24 Weeks in Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05052983
Enrollment
34
Registered
2021-09-22
Start date
2022-01-24
Completion date
2023-09-11
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prurigo Nodularis

Keywords

Prurigo Nodularis, Nemolizumab, CD14152

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to assess the long-term durability of response over a 24-week period following withdrawal of nemolizumab in participants with prurigo nodularis (PN) who previously responded to treatment in the Long-term-Extension (LTE) study RD.06.SPR.202699 (NCT05052983). The secondary objective of this study is to assess the safety of nemolizumab compared to placebo over a 24-week period in participants with PN who previously responded to treatment in the LTE study.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Participants received either 1 (30 mg) or 2 (2\*30 mg) SC injection(s) of placebo every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (with last injection at Week 20). Participants received the same dosage (1 or 2 SC injections) as received in the lead-in LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699, as assigned by IRT.

DRUGNemolizumab

Participants received either 1 \[30 milligram (mg)\] or 2 (2\*30 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection(s) of nemolizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) for a period of 24 weeks (with last injection at Week 20). Participants received the same dosage (1 or 2 SC injections) as received in the lead-in LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699, as assigned by interactive response technology (IRT).

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants who achieved a clinical response at Week 52 of the LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699, defined as: 1. Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) AND 2. Greater than or equal to (\>=)4-point improvement in weekly average of PP NRS score from baseline of the lead-in study Note: Lead-in study baseline is defined as baseline Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP NRS) score in the Phase 3 studies RD.06.SPR.202685 or RD.06.SPR.203065 for participants who rolled over into the LTE from these studies. For participants who entered the LTE study from the Phase 2 study RD.03.SPR.115828, the baseline PP NRS score at entry into the LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 will be used 2. Participants with uninterrupted dosing of nemolizumab in the LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 for 3 months before the Week 52 visit 3. Participants willing and able to transfer into the study at the time of completion of the Week 52 visit in the LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 4. Female participants of childbearing potential (i.e., fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile) must agree to use an adequate and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection. Adequate and approved methods of contraception applicable for the participant and/or her partner are defined in the Protocol 5. Female participants of non-childbearing potential must meet one of the following criteria: 1. Absence of menstrual bleeding for 1 year prior to baseline without any other medical reason, confirmed with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range 2. Documented hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy at least 3 months before the study 6. Participants willing and able to comply with all of the time commitments and procedural requirements of the clinical study protocol, including periodic weekly recordings by the participant using an electronic handheld device provided for this study. 7. Understand and sign an informed consent form (ICF) before any investigational procedure(s) are performed

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants who, during their participation in a prior nemolizumab study, experienced an adverse event which in the opinion of the Investigator could indicate that continued treatment with nemolizumab may present an unreasonable risk for the participant 2. Body weight less than (\<) 30 kg (kilogram) 3. Receipt of prohibited medications, including rescue therapy, in the LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 within 6 months of the Week 52 visit 4. Pregnant women (positive pregnancy test result at baseline visit), breastfeeding women, or women planning a pregnancy during the clinical study 5. Any medical or psychological condition that may put the participant at significant risk according to the Investigator's judgment, if he/she participates in the clinical study, or may interfere with study assessments (e.g., poor venous access or needle-phobia) 6. Planning or expected to have a major surgical procedure during the clinical study 7. Participants unwilling to refrain from using prohibited medications during the clinical study 8. History of alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months of baseline 9. Participants with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection within 2 weeks before baseline 10. Any condition the Investigator deems incompatible with participant participation in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Baseline to Relapse Meeting At Least 1 of the Defined CriteriaBaseline up to Week 24Time from baseline to relapse, defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria. 1. Increase in (weekly average of the) PP NRS score \>=4 points from baseline 2. Increase in IGA score \>=2 points from baseline. Time to relapse was censored at the last assessment of IGA and PP NRS prior to treatment discontinuation or use of prohibited medication

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitBaseline up to Week 24IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of PN. The Investigator reviewed the participant's skin and give a score of 0 (Clear), 1 (Almost clear), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), or 4 (Severe). Treatment response/success was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitBaseline up to Week 24Pruritus NRS is a scale that is used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a 11-point scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Poland, South Korea, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 14 study sites in 7 countries from 24 January 2022 to 11 September 2023.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 34 participants from long-term extension (LTE) study RD.06.SPR.202699 (NCT05052983) were enrolled and treated in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nemolizumab
Participants received either 1(30mg) or 2(2\*30 mg) SC injection(s) of nemolizumab Q4W for a period of 24 weeks (with last injection at Week 20). Participants received the same dosage (1 or 2 SC injections) as received in the lead-in LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 (NCT05052983), as assigned by IRT.
18
Placebo
Participants received either 1 (30 mg) or 2 (2\*30 mg) SC injection(s) of placebo Q4W for a period of 24 weeks (with last injection at Week 20). Participants received the same dosage (1 or 2 SC injections) as received in the lead-in LTE study RD.06.SPR.202699 (NCT05052983), as assigned by IRT.
16
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy312

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNemolizumabTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.06
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.56
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.41
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants28 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 1810 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 180 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Time From Baseline to Relapse Meeting At Least 1 of the Defined Criteria

Time from baseline to relapse, defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria. 1. Increase in (weekly average of the) PP NRS score \>=4 points from baseline 2. Increase in IGA score \>=2 points from baseline. Time to relapse was censored at the last assessment of IGA and PP NRS prior to treatment discontinuation or use of prohibited medication

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NemolizumabTime From Baseline to Relapse Meeting At Least 1 of the Defined CriteriaNA Days
PlaceboTime From Baseline to Relapse Meeting At Least 1 of the Defined Criteria112.50 Days
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled Visit

IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of PN. The Investigator reviewed the participant's skin and give a score of 0 (Clear), 1 (Almost clear), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), or 4 (Severe). Treatment response/success was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. Observed Cases (OC) analysis is applied here, where analysis is using all the observed data at each time point, no imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 882.4 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1681.3 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 488.2 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 2086.7 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1288.2 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 2485.7 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 2460.0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 486.7 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 881.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1253.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1627.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 2057.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled Visit

Pruritus NRS is a scale that is used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a 11-point scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. Observed Cases (OC) analysis is applied here, where analysis is using all the observed data at each time point, no imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 40 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 80 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 120 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 166.7 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 200 Percentage of Participants
NemolizumabPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 240 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 2033.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 40 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1633.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 80 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 240 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Increase in Peak Pruritus (PP) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score of >= 4 Points From Baseline at Each Scheduled VisitAt Week 1216.7 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026